Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Nostalgia is showing up in earnings, but only for the brands that did the repair work
Gap's namesake brand grew sales 10% in the first quarter and Abercrombie posted record net sales. The cycle is shared; the results are not.
The Investor · Invest desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction
What happened
- Gen Z's interest in brands that styled teens of an earlier era is revitalizing once-beleaguered shopping mall retailers; examples include ultra-low-rise jeans from PacSun and bubble skirts from Abercrombie & Fitch.
- Brands making trending items have a hard time surviving the trend cycle, especially after online-first fast-fashion retailers permanently shifted shopping habits; some have adapted and made comebacks, but others haven't made it out of the bargain bin.
- Sales at Gap's namesake brand jumped 10% in the first quarter.
- The Gap first-quarter increase came almost two years after the parent company swung from a net loss in 2022 to a profit in fiscal 2024.
- Abercrombie & Fitch posted record net sales in the three months through early May, its 14th straight quarter of growth, after shrugging off its infamous past.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
Sales at Gap's namesake brand rose 10% in the first quarter, almost two years after the parent company swung from a net loss in 2022 to a profit in fiscal 2024 [3][4]. That is the clearest sign yet that Gen Z's appetite for the brands that dressed millennial teenagers has moved from merchandising deck to income statement [1].
The comparables are real, and they are not all the same kind of number. Abercrombie & Fitch posted record net sales in the three months through early May, its 14th consecutive quarter of growth, which is three and a half years of compounding [5][6]. Privately held PacSun says revenue has climbed to nearly $1 billion [7]. True Religion expects to take in $1 billion annually within five years on its horseshoe-stitched jeans [8]. One of those is an audited comparable, one is a self-reported top line, and one is a forecast. Treat them accordingly.
The demand backdrop helps. Kelly Pedersen, PwC's retail lead, told The Daily Upside that consumers have been shifting budget share toward apparel, and that the category is in the best position he can remember [9][10]. PwC data has families planning to spend an average of $278 on back-to-school clothing this year, the largest single line in the back-to-school budget and more than double what they intend to spend on supplies, which puts supplies under roughly $139 [11][12]. Pedersen attributes part of the shift to GLP-1 drugs, arguing that people eating less are buying more clothes and want to be seen out in them, with a halo effect on children whose parents are on the medications [13]. That is a single-sourced causal claim and worth holding loosely.
What separates the winners from the brands still in the bargain bin is unglamorous [2]. Pedersen's list is pricing, a social media strategy rather than merely a following, and authenticity [14]. Gap dressed the K-pop group Katseye in its basics and, more recently, the actor Inde Navarrette [15]. Abercrombie worked with Josh Heuston [16]. PacSun had a single TikTok post move more than 11,000 pairs of jeans [17]. Abercrombie also had to do remedial work before any of that landed, expanding its size range and putting shirts on its store greeters to put distance between itself and its exclusionary reputation [18].
The part operators should sit with is the funnel. Mall traffic is up, Pedersen says, and conversion is down: young shoppers are treating the mall as a third place for discovery and hanging out rather than transacting [19][20]. Foot traffic is an input, not a revenue line, and the brands converting it are the ones with the pricing and the content engine already built.
Watch whether conversion follows traffic into the back-to-school and holiday quarters, or whether the traffic recovery stays social. Watch whether Abercrombie's streak extends past 14 quarters and whether Gap's namesake growth holds when it is lapping a strong comparable rather than a loss. And watch True Religion against its own $1 billion forecast, which is currently the only number here with no results behind it [8].