Product1 distinct publisher3 min readPublished
The Canadian supplier now has $87 million in a Bengaluru network that booked about $10.5 million of revenue last year. Roughly four in five of its swaps still come from its own former parent, Yulu.
The Product Desk · Product desk

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
A rider working dinner orders in Hyderabad runs the same arithmetic every evening. A swap takes under two minutes, while a 20 or 30 minute fast charge means sitting out the part of the day when orders pay best, and a charger serving several vehicles at once needs more space and power than a swap cabinet does [9]. Yuma managing director Muthu Subramanian told TechCrunch that with Indian gig workers' high daily runtime an EV "makes absolute sense in terms of cost of ownership," and that "uptime is important" [24].
That is an argument about duty cycle rather than about vehicles, and it is roughly why the same architecture has gone nowhere in most other markets [18].
Two divisions show what building ahead of that duty cycle costs. Yuma closed the year to March 2026 with about 1 billion rupees, near $10.5 million [7], spread across more than 400 stations and about 100,000 deployed packs [5][6]. Revenue over batteries puts each pack at roughly $105 for the year [21]. The new $35 million is meant to fund the bulk of a doubling of that fleet within 12 to 18 months [14], which is about $350 per additional battery before one new cabinet is paid for [22]. Subramanian's own phrasing is that "it's a capital-intensive business, and the unit economics will play out at scale" [11]. Yuma is not profitable, though some older stations are EBITDA-positive and management is guiding to break-even at that line within two quarters [8].
The utilization holding up those older stations comes overwhelmingly from one buyer. Non-Yulu customers were 15 to 20 percent of last quarter's swaps [12], leaving 80 to 85 percent with the company Yuma spun out of in early 2023 [23][4]. Magna paid for both ends: $25 million into Yulu and $52 million into the swapping joint venture in 2022, its only two investments in India [3], and $87 million into Yuma once this round closes [19]. Yulu raised $93 million this month to grow its two-wheeler fleet [16], so the anchor tenant is getting bigger, and it is still an anchor tenant sharing an investor with its supplier.
The pitch teams give for swapping is that it removes range anxiety for consumers, but what riders actually do is buy back working hours, and the subscription only clears when the daily kilometres are high. Subramanian estimates 10 to 15 percent of gig-worker vehicles in India are electric today [10], so the growth comes from petrol riders converting rather than from retail EV demand.
For anyone financing an asset before its users exist, the forcing question is this: does one buyer's committed duty cycle fill the asset from the day it lands, and can that buyer be replaced without stranding it. Yuma is strong on the first and thin on the second, and the hedge is real but early: more than five fleets and integrations with more than 10 vehicle platforms, including Kinetic Green, Motovolt, BGauss and Quantum Energy [13]. Which makes the diversification target, about 25 percent non-Yulu swaps in two years [12], the number to hold management to. The cumulative swap count measures how hard one customer rides.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Magna International is investing another $35 million in Yuma Energy, a Bengaluru-based battery-swapping network for electric two- and three-wheelers.
Magna took a 51% stake when the Yuma joint venture was formed; the new investment increases that stake and dilutes Yulu's 49% holding, and managing director Muthu Subramanian declined to disclose the new ownership split.
In 2022 Magna committed a combined $77 million to Yulu and Yuma, with $25 million going to Yulu and $52 million to the battery-swapping joint venture; the two are Magna's only investments in India.
Yuma spun out of Indian mobility startup Yulu in early 2023.
Yuma has completed more than 60 million swaps to date and has about 100,000 batteries deployed across its network.
Yuma operates more than 400 stations with over 2,500 charging units.
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 31, 2026
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
One interview carrying every number
The 60 million swaps, the 100,000 packs, the ₹1 billion of revenue, the two-quarter break-even target — all of it comes from Yuma's managing director on the day his company announced a cheque, and TechCrunch obtained outside confirmation of exactly one detail: that Yulu and Yuma are Magna's only Indian investments. No filings, no audit, no second party, and the post-dilution ownership split is asked for and refused.
Real network, narrow demand base
The deployment side is the sturdiest part of this reporting: 400-plus stations and 2,500 cabinets across 18 cities, packs integrated with more than ten vehicle platforms, 60 million swaps banked. What holds the number down is who swaps. On Yuma's own quarterly figure, roughly four in five swaps still come from Yulu — the parent it spun out of, a 49%-and-shrinking shareholder, and a company that just raised $93 million of its own. Scale is genuine; independent demand is thin.
Framing restrained, arithmetic left to the reader
TechCrunch does not oversell this: unprofitability, capital intensity and the Yulu dependence are all in the copy. The gap that survives is arithmetic the piece declines to perform. $87 million of Magna money now sits behind about $10.5 million of revenue — roughly $105 per deployed pack — and doubling the fleet on $35 million works out near $350 per additional battery before a station or cabinet is paid for. Nothing stated is inflated; the scale of the bet relative to the business is simply left unstated.
Everyone quoted benefits from the picture
The single voice here is the executive whose company just took the money, describing a business whose "unit economics will play out at scale" — the standard phrasing for economics that do not yet. Magna's position points the same way: it is buying more of the venture, diluting its partner, and declining to say by how much. And Yuma's dominant customer, Yulu, is both a shareholder and a company that closed $93 million weeks earlier, which makes it the party least served by any doubt about the network it depends on.
Direction solid, precision missing
That money moved, that the network physically exists, and that one customer dominates it are unlikely to be wrong — the details are too specific and too unflattering to be invented. What cannot be pinned down is any figure to the decimal: unaudited numbers from one conversation, a withheld cap table, and forward commitments (break-even in two quarters, a doubled fleet, 25% non-Yulu volume) that no outside party has yet tested.