Skip to content

Build1 publisher3 min readPublished

OpenProposal turns the media-buying RFP into a catalog a buyer agent can rank

IAB Tech Lab's AAMP 3.0 adds a schema for publishers to describe ad products and answer briefs, then hands approved proposals to the AdCOM, OpenDirect and Deals API standards it already publishes. Comment closes October 22nd.

The Engineer · Build desk

Illustration accompanying OpenProposal turns the media-buying RFP into a catalog a buyer agent can rank

What happened

  • IAB Tech Lab CEO Anthony Katsur released AAMP 3.0 on September 22nd, whose central addition, OpenProposal, is a machine-readable format for describing ad products and responding to requests for proposals.
  • IAB Tech Lab describes a seven-stage workflow: sellers publish products, buyers discover packages, agents compare options, opportunities are qualified against the media plan, terms are negotiated, orders are executed, performance is reported.
  • The specification is in public comment through October 22nd while IAB Tech Lab incorporates it into reference software for buyer and seller agents.
  • AAMP itself is an open-source collection of protocols, schemas and reference implementations, with separate buyer-agent and seller-agent builds developers can download from its repository hub.

Compiled by The EngineerSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Nothing downstream works until sellers have structured product data, so the first bill for agentic buying lands on publishers while the comparison benefit lands on buyers.
  • decision Each seller faces a different decision depending on its stack: map product data into a schema if it already books through OpenDirect, or build a machine-readable catalog out of media kits if it does not.
  • exposure Once agents can commit spend, the authorization list is what stands between a publisher and an order placed by a counterparty it never vetted.
  • precedent Folding OpenProposal into the reference agents during the comment period means early adopters integrate against working code, and a late schema change would break running implementations.

A seller publishes a catalog of standard packages and holds other products back for custom proposals [5]. A buyer agent submits the campaign brief, then ranks what comes back against declared audience, timing, format and pricing requirements [6]. That ranking is only as good as the declarations. Fields nobody populated cannot be compared.

The parts of AAMP 3.0 worth reading closely are the unglamorous ones. Pricing, packages, orders and buy details are constrained by deterministic rules [9]. Authentication and authorization decide which agents can transact [10]. Idempotency lets an agent retry an order request that went unanswered without accidentally placing the order twice [11]. A person who emails an RFP twice gets an apologetic reply; an agent retrying an order over a protocol with no idempotency gets two orders.

What it costs to adopt depends on what you already run. An approved proposal is designed to flow into IAB Tech Lab's existing AdCOM, OpenDirect and Deals API standards for booking, execution and reporting [7]. The reference buyer software is built to browse seller catalogs, negotiate prices, aggregate inventory across publishers and book programmatic-direct deals through OpenDirect [14]. A seller whose booking path is already OpenDirect is mapping product data into a new schema and standing up an endpoint. A seller whose RFP process runs on briefs, media kits, spreadsheets, emails and meetings [8] has to build the catalog first.

Katsur has worked inside those systems. He took over IAB Tech Lab in 2021, after engineering, product and management roles at DoubleClick, a CEO stint at Maxifier, senior positions at MediaMath and Rubicon Project, leading Sonobi and an executive role at Nexstar Media Group. His IAB Tech Lab biography spans more than 27 years in advertising technology [19]. According to runtimewire, AAMP 3.0 follows that history: it asks publishers, agencies and ad-tech platforms to make existing systems legible to agents [23].

"OpenProposal fills a major gap between a buyer's brief and a buy commitment," Katsur said in the announcement [15]. PMG executive Mike Treon said in the announcement that AAMP 3.0 lets a publisher's reasoning about why an audience, format or sponsorship suits a campaign travel with the proposal in a form planning models can read [16].

runtimewire's own assessment is that OpenProposal's value depends on adoption while overlapping agentic advertising standards compete for buyers and publishers [18]. The article does not name one of those competitors [22], so the competitive question cannot be settled from this record. The handoff into AdCOM, OpenDirect and Deals API [7] makes the first integration a schema mapping for sellers already on those standards. And the thirty days between the September 22nd release and the October 22nd close of comment is the window in which the schema can still change [20].

What to watch

  • Whether IAB Tech Lab publishes what changed in the OpenProposal schema after comment closes on October 22nd.
  • Whether a named seller platform ships an OpenProposal catalog against the reference seller agent.
  • Whether the reference buyer agent's OpenDirect booking path gets exercised by a live programmatic-direct deal.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories