Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

Tanzanian fertilizer shops turn over at twice the rate of other small firms in low-income countries

Fertilizer quality only becomes visible in the plant months after purchase, so farmers lean on the seller's reputation as a stand-in. Illinois researchers put annual dealer entry at 33% and exit at 17% in Tanzania's Morogoro region.

The Scientist · Science desk

Photograph accompanying Tanzanian fertilizer shops turn over at twice the rate of other small firms in low-income countries
Photo: newswise.com

What happened

  • In a study in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois researchers put annual entry among agro-dealers in Tanzania at 33% and annual exit at 17%.
  • Independent testing across multiple studies and laboratories has found the fertilizer sold in the region to be consistently of good quality, according to co-author Hope Michelson.
  • Survey answers describe entrants who are educated and trained in the agricultural sector and who open their shops intending to trade for the long run.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Reputation is the one quality signal available at the moment of purchase, and an exit rate that clears roughly two fifths of a cohort within three years caps how many seasons of evidence any single counter can build up.
  • contradiction The laboratory record and the farmer record point in opposite directions, so a programme that spends on improving fertilizer quality is spending on something the tests say is already fine.
  • decision A ministry or donor choosing where input-adoption money goes now has shop survival on the same list as farmer training, and the two require different instruments.

A 17% annual exit rate limits how long any one shop is around to be judged. Hold that rate steady and assume nobody re-enters, and 0.83 cubed leaves 57 of every 100 dealers trading after three years, so about 43 have gone [15]. How much that matters depends on how slowly the product reports back. "Agricultural inputs are experience goods: you don't know if a product is of good quality until after purchase and use," said Hope Michelson, a professor of agricultural and consumer economics at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and a co-author. "For fertilizer, you might not know for several months because the plant's agronomic response to the application only becomes observable over time" [4].

Both figures are reported as annual rates. Taken against the same stock of shops, entry at 33% exceeds exit at 17% by 16 points a year [2][14]. So a farmer walking into a market meets a growing number of counters, a large share of them new. Combined entry and exit of 50 points against a benchmark the researchers describe as less than half that puts typical churn among nonagricultural micro and small enterprises in low-income countries below 25 points [3][16].

The belief the turnover is supposed to explain is well documented and, on the laboratory evidence, wrong. Smallholders in Tanzania commonly hold that the fertilizer for sale locally is of poor quality and short of important nutrients [6], while independent testing across multiple studies and laboratories has found the fertilizer sold in the region consistently good, according to Michelson [5]. Earlier work had put low adoption down to thin information and distrust in local product quality [13].

Alix Naugler, the corresponding author, said the team "set out to document these rates of agro-dealer turnover and to benchmark them against what we observe in other developing countries among micro and small enterprises" [8]. Naugler did the fieldwork with local collaborators including Christopher Magomba of Sokoine University of Agriculture, and the team also ran phone surveys with dealers already in its database from earlier studies [10][12].

The survey answers rule out the tidiest explanation for churn this high: fallback businesses run by people waiting for a better option [17]. Naugler said the dealers in the sample "are educated and trained in the agricultural sector, and they enter with the intent to operate for the long run" [7].

The design cannot settle direction. The published summary of the paper does not give the size of the estimated relationship between turnover and farmer beliefs [1]. Distrust can shorten a shop's life through weak sales as easily as a short-lived shop can leave distrust unresolved, and repeated rounds of surveys in the same markets do not separate the two. Michelson's team has been sampling and testing fertilizer in Morogoro for a decade, returning to the same markets each time [9][11].

What to watch

  • Whether the full paper reports the size and sign of the estimated turnover-belief relationship, and with what identification.
  • Whether the 33% entry and 17% exit rates hold in Tanzanian regions outside Morogoro, or in a second country.
  • Whether any trial tests the causal direction by stabilising dealer businesses and then measuring farmer beliefs about quality.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories