Leadership1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
A Pixel 10 Pro wired into a Formula E GEN4's telemetry bus ran a local agent and fed the driver advice in about a second. The architecture is the story, not the hillclimb time.
The Board Room · Leadership desk

Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made
Google Cloud mounted a Pixel 10 Pro inside a Formula E GEN4 car at the 2026 Goodwood Festival of Speed, connected it to the car's CAN bus, and ran an agent on the handset that spoke to driver Dan Ticktum through his earpiece [1][5][10]. The racing is the packaging; the substance is an inference topology that very few enterprise AI plans currently fund.
According to Forbes, which interviewed both companies at the event, the split worked like this: Google's Gemma model ran on the phone and analysed vehicle telemetry locally, while agent-to-agent communication could reach Gemini outside the car for context such as timing feeds or broadcast data [8][9]. John Abel, a managing director in Google Cloud's Office of the CTO, described it as "running a little micro agent on the actual phone," calibrated for the questions the driver cares about: where he is losing time, how his traction is, how the balance is from left to right [6][7]. Abel said the system could, "within a matter of a second, give him immediate feedback in his earpiece" [10]. Formula E CTO Dan Cherowbrier said the aim was to get the insights closer to the driver [11].
The physical conditions are what make the choice non-optional. The GEN4 produces up to 600kW, roughly 815hp, with permanent all-wheel drive and 0-100 kph in about 1.8 seconds [2], an average of roughly 1.6 g [2]. The car goes up the hill at more than 150 mph [4], which is about 67 metres per second [1]; a one-second advisory loop is spent while the car covers 67 metres of narrow tarmac. Forbes notes the hill is hot and dusty and that connectivity there cannot be assumed [12]. Round-tripping to a data centre, which is how most generative AI is delivered today [16], is not a design option in that envelope.
For operators, the interesting cost is organisational. A workload split between a small model on an endpoint and a large one in a region is two build pipelines, two update cadences, two security boundaries, and a routing decision about which side handles which task that somebody has to own and audit. Abel's own non-racing example was manufacturing: cameras and models embedded in production equipment that spot a displacement or fault and alert an operator immediately [13]. That is capital in endpoints and integration work at the machine, not incremental spend on tokens, and it lands on plant and field engineering teams rather than the central platform group.
Two caveats belong on the record. The reported latency is "a matter of a second" [10] with no published measurement, model size or accuracy figure, and nothing in the account claims the agent made the car faster; Ticktum's 42.46-second run is described as one of the quickest ever recorded on the hillclimb [14] without attribution to the phone. Google Cloud and Formula E have also been working together on race strategy and broadcast insights already [15], so the promotional incentive is not hidden.
What to watch: whether the on-device and cloud agent split shows up as a shipped product with a documented routing policy rather than a festival demonstration; whether it appears in competitive race weekends, where the rules on driver aids bite differently; and whether the industrial version Abel described arrives with an answer for who patches a fleet of inference endpoints bolted to moving machinery.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
At the 2026 Goodwood Festival of Speed, Formula E driver Dan Ticktum drove the new GEN4 race car up the hillclimb while Google Cloud technology analysed what was happening around him.
The GEN4 is Formula E's most powerful car yet, capable of up to 600kW (around 815hp), with permanent all-wheel drive and 0-100 kph acceleration in roughly 1.8 seconds.
The racing car travels up the narrow Goodwood hill at more than 150 miles per hour.
A Google Pixel 10 Pro was mounted in the car running AI locally, and was connected to the car's CAN bus, giving it access to telemetry from sensors distributed throughout the vehicle.
Abel said: "We're actually running a little micro agent on the actual phone. That agent's been calibrated for the things that Dan would like to know, like, 'Where am I losing time? How's my traction? How's the balance from left to right?'"
John Abel is a Managing Director in Google Cloud's Office of the CTO.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
First-hand but single-source and unmeasured
The account is direct - a reporter on site, named executives from both Google Cloud and Formula E quoted, a specific device, a specific bus, named models, and a verifiable event result of 42.46 seconds. That supports the existence and rough shape of the system. It does not support its performance: the only latency figure is an unquantified spokesperson phrase, no model, compute, thermal or accuracy detail is given, no comparison against a cloud round trip is run, and there is exactly one publisher with no independent corroboration.
One showcase run inside an existing partnership
Adoption is observable but minimal: a single car, a single hillclimb run at a festival, inside a pre-existing Google Cloud/Formula E relationship that had already produced race strategy and broadcast work. There is no race-weekend rollout, no second team, no enterprise customer, no product availability statement, and no indication the setup persists beyond the demonstration.
Framing runs ahead of the demonstration
The material is genuinely interesting as an architecture sketch, and the article is candid that it is an experiment. But it escalates from one showcase run to 'the next phase of AI', sweeping in robots, warehouses, energy infrastructure and healthcare devices, while the single quantitative performance assertion - feedback within about a second - is unverified. At more than 150 mph a one-second loop elapses over roughly 67 metres of track, which is a material caveat the framing does not weigh. Positive gap, moderate rather than extreme.
Sponsor-side access and promotional framing
Both technical narrators are interested parties: a Google Cloud Office of the CTO managing director promoting Google's own Gemma and Gemini stack, and Formula E's CTO promoting the series as a technology laboratory, with the series' Chief Marketing Officer supplying the superlative about the car. The story arises from granted on-site access at a promotional festival within an existing commercial collaboration, and no independent engineer, rival vendor or dissenting voice is present. The article does not disclose the nature of that commercial relationship.
Confident on shape, weak on performance
I am reasonably confident the described system existed and was configured as reported: the detail is specific, on-the-record and internally consistent, and the event result is publicly checkable. I have low confidence in any claim about how well it worked, whether it influenced the run, or whether the pattern is production-ready, because the cluster holds one publisher, one access-based account, no measurements and no independent verification.
security
Google's reference agent approved a $10,000 refund on a $149 order, on purpose1 distinct publisher
product
Google gives US students a $200 AI plan free, plus a renewal date and 5TB of switching cost3 distinct publishers
invest
H100 rentals are back to $2.35 an hour, and your AI cost model is stale1 distinct publisher
build
Under 30% citation overlap between engines makes pooled AI visibility scores unbuyable1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 18, 2026