Science1 publisher3 min readPublished
The chain beats the old single-atom record by more than a hundredfold and survives an acid bath, but the current runs through its carbon sheath rather than through the copper, and the synthesis needs a diamond anvil cell.
The Scientist · Science desk

science
What you expect from your own old age shows up a decade later in who you still see1 publisher
science
NASA's two Sun papers ask paleoclimate to carry an astrophysical term2 publishers
science
Researchers trace a third of Central Valley groundwater loss to 122 named producers1 publisher
science
The sharp crystal seed was never there: 8,000 nuclei imaged atom by atom, all gradients1 publisher
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
The ratio worth doing by hand is 4,000 over 28. That comes to roughly 143 times, or just past two orders of magnitude [14], which places the "two to three orders of magnitude" in the phys.org account at the low end of its own range [3]. It is still a large jump in a field where nearly every earlier chain stalled below 10 atoms, because the ligands needed to stabilise a longer chain stopped dissolving in the solution growing it [9]. The result was published in Science [4].
The design matters more than the record. Copper phthalocyanine molecules are flat rings with one copper atom apiece, and in the crystal they stack like a column of coins [10]. Compressing that crystal drives the coppers together while the outer rings of neighbouring molecules fuse into a diamond-like carbon tube, which pins the copper into a straight line [11]. Container and contents come out of the same molecule in the same step, and that is why the product survives handling: hours in a strongly acidic bath under harsh ultrasonic vibration, and stability in air [7]. Single-atom chains tend to be fragile, but this one comes wrapped in its own armour, which is why it holds up under that kind of treatment.
Then the measurement that complicates the interconnect story. The copper atoms do not carry the current. Metal-to-metal bonding along the chain is too weak, and conduction instead runs through the overlapping carbon and nitrogen atoms of the ring framework wrapped around the core [5]. Magnetically the copper still behaves like a chain, with antiferromagnetic coupling between neighbours and moments alternating in direction [8]. As a wire, though, the metal core works as scaffolding for the carbon-nitrogen conductor wrapped around it.
On the electrical side the reported number is a ratio: current flows more than 10 times faster along real samples than across them, and a model of a defect-free chain gives 1,000 times [6]. Anisotropy of that kind tells you the structure is genuinely one-dimensional in its transport. The thing it does not tell you is resistivity, how much current the wire tolerates before it fails, or what happens at the contacts, none of which appear in this account [16]. Those are the quantities a wiring decision turns on, and the gap between 10x measured and 1,000x modelled is a defect-density problem, not a rounding error.
So the framing of shrinking chip interconnects sits awkwardly on this work. Silicon scaling limits are the motivation phys.org offers, and one-dimensional single-metal-atom chains are the thinnest metal wires anyone can imagine [13][15], but the demonstration here is a synthesis result: solid-state, solvent-free, and dependent on more than 21 gigapascals, about 200,000 atmospheres, inside a diamond anvil cell [1]. Phys.org names that pressure requirement as the bottleneck for industrial production [12]. Chain length is no longer capped by solubility; that much is established. Whether anything on this route can be wired to anything else is not.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Researchers compressed crystals of copper phthalocyanine (CuPc), the compound used to make phthalo blue pigment, at more than 21 gigapascals (roughly 200,000 times normal atmospheric pressure) inside a diamond anvil cell, converting them into copper atomic chains stretching for micrometers, each encased in a carbon sheath.
The researchers eliminated liquids and used a high-pressure solid-state reaction, starting from copper phthalocyanine whose flat ring-like molecules, each containing a single copper atom, naturally stack one above another like a column of coins.
Under pressure the copper atoms were pushed close together while the outer carbon rings of adjacent pigment molecules fused into a tough, diamond-like carbon tube around the copper core, locking the copper atoms into a straight, stable line.
Each nanowire has three concentric layers: a core that is a single-atom chain of copper, a conductive ring-like frame of carbon and nitrogen atoms, and an outer protective sp3-carbon sheath.
More than 4,000 copper atoms were strung into a single chain, described as two to three orders of magnitude longer than any single-atom chain made before; the previous record was 28 atoms.
Publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · September 6, 2026
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Peer-reviewed paper, one secondary retelling
The underlying work carries a journal, a lead author and a DOI, which puts a floor under it. The ceiling comes from what reaches us: a single science-news summary, and an electrical case that consists entirely of an along-versus-across ratio with one of the two values coming from a model rather than a sample.
Nothing outside the anvil cell
The only dated event is the paper appearing. No fabrication run, pilot, licensee or device is described, and the reporting itself says the pressure requirement stands between the method and industrial production. There is no adoption here to score.
Molecular-wire frame runs ahead of what conducted
The opening invokes silicon's physical limits and wires that could shrink past conventional dimensions; the reporting's own findings say the copper is not the conducting path and the material exists only under a diamond anvil. Add the order-of-magnitude phrasing, which is stretched at its upper end by its own arithmetic, and the presentation sits somewhat above what was demonstrated. The gap is moderate rather than wide because the caveat is printed, not buried elsewhere.
No vendor in the frame; the ask belongs to the publisher
Nobody in this story is selling a product. What pressure exists is editorial and academic: the piece appends a reader donation appeal alongside its author, editor and fact-checker credits, and the forward-looking optimism is attributed to the researchers whose paper is being covered. Against that, the outlet printed the scale-up problem in its own words.
Good provenance, thin corroboration
Confidence in the physics is reasonable because the source names its paper and its numbers are internally consistent apart from the order-of-magnitude wording. Confidence in the significance is lower: one outlet, one paper, and an electrical picture built from a ratio and a simulation.