Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Nodus's former chief executive forfeits $16.9 million of a $24.9 million fraud plea
Tomas Niembro Concha drew 112 months in a Florida federal court after pleading guilty to a wire-fraud conspiracy and a sanctions count. The bank he ran has been gone since 2023, and the forfeiture order is $16.9 million.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- Tomas Niembro Concha, chief executive of Nodus International Bank until it collapsed in 2023, was sentenced Monday to 112 months in federal prison plus three years of supervised release.
- He pleaded guilty in March to two counts: conspiring to fraudulently obtain at least $24.9 million from Nodus Bank, and conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
- The court also ordered him to forfeit more than $16.9 million, the amount identified as proceeds he received from the wire-fraud conspiracy.
- Three other executives were charged; Emilio Santandreu, whose Miami microfinance business took $11 million from Niembro and others, got 34 months, later cut to 22.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint The charter died in 2023, so no corporate fine or consent order was available in this case; every dollar the government recovers has to be found in an individual's holdings.
- cost The distance between the 48 months his lawyers called sufficient and the 112 imposed is 64 months.
- precedent With the criminal division framing bank officers as gatekeepers, executives at institutions serving sanctioned jurisdictions should expect a sanctions count charged alongside fraud, where the fraud proceeds set the forfeiture.
- exposure The chief executive drew roughly five times the co-defendant's final term.
Niembro admitted to a conspiracy to obtain at least $24.9 million from Nodus Bank. The forfeiture order covers $16.9 million of it, described in the sentencing as the proceeds he received from that conspiracy [3][2]. That is about 68 cents of every dollar in the plea figure, and roughly $8 million sits between the two numbers [2][1].
The conduct ran from August 2017 through at least October 2023, about 74 months. So the conspiracy took out something near $337,000 a month. Meanwhile, according to the government's sentencing memo, other board members, executives and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico were kept unaware [3][5][14]. Nodus International Bank was founded in 2009 and primarily catered to Venezuelan customers [12]. The memo says Niembro used the money to "fund his lavish lifestyle" and to invest in companies including a Venezuelan supermarket chain [13].
The sanctions leg is the smaller money. Between 2021 and 2023 Niembro conspired to transact with a person designated by the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control [15]. The two of them had Nodus Bank foreclose on the man's Southampton, New York home, for which they obtained OFAC authorization. Then they reached a private agreement to sell the property back to him for $4 million through a front company. The Justice Department says OFAC never licensed that sale [16][17].
"The defendant abused his position with Nodus Bank to commit fraud for his own enrichment and to willfully evade sanctions on a designated individual," A. Tysen Duva, assistant attorney general of the Justice Department's criminal division, said in a press release [6]. Niembro's lawyers had asked for 48 to 60 months [7]. "Mr. Niembro's offenses were serious, and he accepted responsibility for them promptly and without reservation. On this record, a sentence of 48 months is sufficient," they argued in their sentencing memo [8].
His lawyers also wrote that the presentence report recommended he be surrendered to Immigration and Customs Enforcement "for removal proceedings" at the end of his prison term. They wrote that his lawful status in the United States ended on March 16, 2025, and that he has surrendered his Venezuelan and Spanish passports [10][9]. The government's sentencing memo does not mention ICE [11]. He is 64, so a full term served from sentencing would put him at about 73 on release [5][8].
In my view prosecutors will keep pairing these counts. The self-enrichment is what produced a forfeiture figure at all, and the recovery here is measured by fraud proceeds [2][16]. The counter-thesis is that Duva's gatekeeper language is the operative part, and that the next case needs only access to the payment system, no proceeds. An IEEPA charge against a bank officer with nothing to forfeit would settle which reading is right. Attorneys for Niembro did not immediately respond to American Banker's request for comment [20].
What to watch
- Whether the December restitution hearing produces an order beyond the forfeiture, and whether assets are found to satisfy it.
- An IEEPA charge against a bank officer with no fraud proceeds to forfeit would test Duva's gatekeeper framing.
- Whether a removal order actually follows the prison term, since only the defence describes that recommendation.