Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

Booth counts 80 firms behind the SEC petition that reopened the ETF share class

David Booth told The Daily Upside that neither mutual funds nor ETFs are inherently superior, and the work that made his $1.1 trillion firm a top active ETF manager was a regulatory petition plus a run of fund conversions.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Booth counts 80 firms behind the SEC petition that reopened the ETF share class
Photo: wealthmanagement.com

What happened

  • Booth said Dimensional petitioned the SEC for permission to offer ETF share classes, told the industry it was doing so, and that something like 80 firms lined up behind it before regulators opened the route last year.
  • By Booth's account Vanguard obtained permission to run ETF share classes about 30 years ago, and until the recent relief the SEC had not let other managers follow it into the structure.
  • Dimensional now manages $1.1 trillion, up from a business run out of a spare room of Booth's Brooklyn brownstone, with Booth still setting direction under co-CEOs Dave Butler and Gerard O'Reilly.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision An advisor sitting in a legacy mutual fund class of a Dimensional strategy now has a second door into the same portfolio, and on Booth's own ranking of the advantages the choice turns first on tax treatment.
  • constraint With roughly 80 managers cleared for the same structure, tax efficiency stops separating one fund company from another, and competition falls back on fees and the research inside the fund.
  • precedent Reaching top active ETF manager through conversions and launches sets the expectation for every firm with a large legacy fund line-up that the packaging is the thing to change first.
  • exposure Booth's caution on leverage is advice to buyers, not a brake on issuance: the products keep being filed, and the losses he describes land on the retail holders who buy them.

Dimensional has also been at the forefront of converting mutual funds into ETFs, Booth said, and he called that innovation related to the share class petition [10]. Those are changes to how a fund is packaged. The research inside is what a group of University of Chicago academics started the firm on [1], and what Booth and Rex Sinquefield have argued beats Wall Street intuition since the early 1980s [2]. His own summary of the result: "Between conversions and launches, we're now a top active ETF manager" [9].

The interview's editor's note dates the expiry of Vanguard's patent on the ETF share class to 2023 [8]. The patent and the SEC relief are separate gates, and on Booth's count the structure was one firm's for roughly three decades before the second one opened [19].

In my view Dimensional is competing on packaging while telling clients that packaging is not where returns come from. Booth says both halves out loud. "Neither is inherently superior, mutual funds or ETFs, but it's undeniable that ETFs have some big advantages, starting with the tax efficiency, and the proliferation of active products has just been huge in recent years," he said [6]. He expects the growth on the ETF side to continue [18].

The interview does not break out how much of the $1.1 trillion sits in ETFs [20]. That number would decide whether conversions are moving existing clients into a cheaper tax treatment or pulling in new money, and until someone publishes it the case for the wrapper as the competitive front rests on where a research house has been spending its regulatory effort. If most of the roughly 80 petitioners file for the class and never gather assets in it, the relief was an option and manager selection goes back to fees and research [7].

Booth was cooler on the other kind of product innovation. The Daily Upside asked him about the pace of filings for products built to be traded intraday and themes akin to gambling [14]. "In my 57 years in this business, if there's one common theme to all the bankruptcies and catastrophes that've come up, it's leverage of some form," he said [12]. He added that there is nothing wrong with leverage in itself as long as it is reasonable and managed carefully, and that he hopes investors getting into these products understand that [13]. Some of them, he said, enjoy the gambling aspect, and for those a small exposure to products they understand is probably fine [15].

The firm also paid for a film. Errol Morris made a documentary about Dimensional's founding, published last year with the firm's funding, and it has more than 32 million views on YouTube [16]. "It's gratifying, because our goal with the movie was also about helping more people better understand the financial markets, asset managers and how investing actually works," Booth said [17].

What to watch

  • Whether the roughly 80 firms that backed Dimensional's petition actually launch ETF share classes and gather assets in them.
  • Any Dimensional disclosure of ETF assets against its $1.1 trillion total, which would show whether conversions moved existing clients.
  • The filing pace for leveraged and intraday-traded ETF products in the quarters after Booth's caution.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories