Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

Modelled odour receptors lead INRAE to the lily moth's sex pheromone

INRAE-led researchers modelled two lily moth odour receptors with AI and used them to find the species' previously unknown sex pheromone. The route could speed pheromone work on little-studied pests, though confirming the hit still took live moths.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying Modelled odour receptors lead INRAE to the lily moth's sex pheromone

What happened

  • INRAE scientists, working with Universite Cote d'Azur and Nanjing Agricultural University, used an AI-based method to identify the lily moth's sex pheromone and the receptors that detect it.
  • After picking two candidate receptors, the team predicted their 3D structures with AI and used molecular docking to find volatile molecules likely to bind them.
  • Chemical and electrophysiological tests confirmed that females secrete (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate and that males detect it.
  • Behavioral tests showed the compound attracts male lily moths and elicits their sexual behavior.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • capability The lily moth work shows a pheromone candidate can be shortlisted from genes and receptor models before anyone works out when the females signal.
  • constraint Confirmation still needed secreting females and responding males, so pests that cannot be collected or reared in numbers stay hard to work on.
  • constraint The receptor shortlist leaned on comparisons with related species, so pests from lineages with few characterised relatives give the method less to start from.

Running the search backwards is the clever part. The conventional route starts with the insect that emits the signal. It needs live insects, knowledge of exactly when they produce pheromone, and chemical analysis of many compounds to judge which ones attract [4]. The INRAE team started with the receiver, identifying its olfactory receptors from the moth's genes [5]. That moves the first round of screening onto a computer, where molecular docking predicts how two molecules might bind [7].

A docking score is a prediction [7], and the team gave it several chances to fail. The receptors had to respond to the predicted molecules at the bench [8]. The compound then had to turn up in females and be detected by males in electrophysiological recordings [9]. Finally it had to draw males and set off sexual behavior [10]. Four kinds of experiment stand behind one computational call [1]. A molecule that the receptors bind but the moths do not actually use would have failed the secretion or behavior tests.

The denominator is small: one species, two candidate receptors [6], one compound. The paper's title claims the "major" female sex pheromone component [2], wording that leaves room for minor ones. The summary does not report how many molecules were docked, where the correct one ranked, or how long the work took against a conventional search.

INRAE calls the study a proof of concept and says the approach could considerably speed up the characterisation of unknown sex pheromones, particularly in current, emerging and invasive crop pests [13]. I think that is right in direction. How big the gain is depends on how often docking puts the true compound near the top of its list. Estimating that rate will take many species.

Pheromone control works in two ways. Large quantities can be released into the air to disrupt mating, or traps can estimate or control population density [11]. A positive behavioral test is the first requirement for either use. Field performance is a separate result.

The lily moth is absent from mainland France [12]. It occurs in Asia and Oceania, and its caterpillars feed on lilies [3]. INRAE says the result opens up pheromone-based control of the moth [14]. The places where it is a significant pest are private gardens, public parks and botanical gardens, where rules on pest-control products are particularly strict [12].

What to watch

  • A second species run through the receptor-first pipeline, ideally an invasive crop pest with few well-studied relatives, with the docking hit rate reported.
  • Field trials of (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate in traps or mating disruption against lily moths in parks or botanical gardens.
  • Release of the full docking results: how many volatile molecules were screened and where the confirmed pheromone ranked.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories