Invest1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
Pasteur bundles a bridge signature-counting fix, a retired-key cleanup, and a pre-executed-block change that took testnet throughput from 1,237 to 2,324 TPS.
The Investor · Invest desk

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
BNB Chain has set 02:30 UTC on August 25, 2026 as the activation time for the Pasteur hard fork on BNB Smart Chain mainnet, and told every node operator to be running client v1.7.7 before then or risk falling off the network [1][2]. The date and the client requirement were published in a blog post on August 14, which leaves operators roughly 11 days of notice [3][4].
Pasteur sits under meta proposal BEP-673 and pulls three other proposals into a single coordinated activation: BEP-682, BEP-695, and BEP-675 [4]. The first two are security work on the bridge and on the staking and governance contracts; BEP-675 is a throughput change that, by BNB Chain's own account, does not technically require a hard fork to function [5]. Bundling it anyway means the performance feature and the security fixes now share one deadline.
The bridge fix is the one worth reading closely. When assets move onto BSC, the chain does not take the origin chain's word for it; it runs a precompile at address 0x67 that counts validator signatures against a known validator set, and the transfer clears only once a supermajority has signed [6]. There was no check that each validator appeared only once, so a crafted validator set could list the same signer repeatedly, count that signer's voting power on each appearance, and clear the threshold with fewer genuine signatures than the rule demands [7]. BEP-682 strips duplicates before the count [8].
BEP-695 addresses a related gap in assumptions. Rotating a consensus key was supposed to retire its authority, and did not: the old key kept validator-admin privileges, rotation could be used to dodge a pending eviction, and blacklisted addresses could still cast signature-based governance votes. All three are now closed [9].
The throughput change is a scheduling argument, not a capacity one. Today a BSC block is executed twice, once by the builder to confirm validity and again by the validator before it signs [10]. That second pass consumes part of the 450 millisecond window, and whatever the validator spends there is time builders lose to pack the next block [11]. BEP-675 lets a builder hand over an already executed block; the validator checks it against consensus rules, signs, broadcasts, and completes full verification afterwards [12].
On testnet, validator time in the execution layer fell from 125 milliseconds to 15 milliseconds, an 88% cut that returns about 24% of the block interval to block building [13][2][1]. Throughput rose from 1,237 to 2,324 TPS, an increase of about 88%, with the 100 million gas limit and the 450 millisecond interval left untouched [14][d5b]. Average block gas used went from 46.35 million to 84.15 million, meaning utilisation moved from roughly 46% of the limit to roughly 84% [15][3]. In other words, the binding constraint was the clock, not the gas ceiling. Finality lag held steady [15].
BNB Chain flagged that these are controlled-workload numbers that still have to hold under mainnet traffic, particularly when several builders compete for the same slot [16]. That caveat matters more than the headline figure. For context, the Fermi fork shipped in January 2026 and cut block times to 0.45 seconds, and the chain has spent the months since holding that pace rather than pushing it lower [17].
Watch three things after the 25th: whether real mainnet block gas used lands anywhere near the 84.15 million testnet figure [15], whether finality lag stays flat once multiple builders contend for slots [16], and whether validators actually complete post-signature verification without incident, since signing now precedes full checking [12].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
BNB Chain will activate the Pasteur hard fork on BSC mainnet at 02:30 UTC on August 25, 2026.
BNB Chain stated that every node operator has to be running client v1.7.7 before the activation time or risk falling off the network.
BNB Chain confirmed the activation date and client requirement in a blog post published on August 14.
BEP-675 allows a builder to hand over a block it has already executed; the validator checks it against consensus rules, signs, broadcasts, and then finishes full verification afterwards.
Testnet throughput rose from 1,237 to 2,324 transactions per second, with the 100 million gas limit and the 450-millisecond block interval left untouched.
The Pasteur hard fork is placed under meta proposal BEP-673 and brings BEP-682, BEP-695 and BEP-675 into one coordinated activation.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Specific and dated, but single-source and vendor-supplied
Every load-bearing fact — activation timestamp, mandatory client version, BEP contents, and the performance numbers — traces to one publisher relaying BNB Chain's own blog and documentation. The specificity is high (02:30 UTC August 25, v1.7.7, precompile 0x67, 125 ms to 15 ms, 1,237 to 2,324 TPS, 46.35M to 84.15M gas) and the source reproduces the protocol's caveat, but there is no independent audit, researcher attribution, or third-party measurement in the cluster.
Testnet done, mainnet activation still ahead
Adoption evidence is real but forward-looking: the fork ran on the Chapel testnet from July 21, 2026, and mainnet activation is scheduled for August 25, 2026 with a mandatory client. Nothing in the source reports how many operators, validators, or builders have actually moved to v1.7.7, and no mainnet traffic has run under BEP-675, so realised adoption remains unmeasured.
Mildly overstated: testnet headline carries the story
The ~88% throughput gain is the framing device in the headline bullets and dek even though it comes from a single controlled testnet run with no mainnet validation and no multi-builder contention test. The overstatement is modest rather than severe because the article reproduces BNB Chain's own caveat, keeps the gas-limit and block-interval parameters explicit, and centres the concrete, verifiable operator deadline rather than speculative outcomes.
Protocol-sourced performance numbers, promotional publisher context
The performance and security claims originate with BNB Chain, which benefits from presenting BSC as fast and hardened, and the only benchmark is one the protocol ran and disclosed itself. On the publisher side the page carries a newsletter solicitation and an investment disclaimer typical of crypto trade media. Offsetting factors: the operator deadline and client version are verifiable commitments the protocol cannot spin, and the caveat about mainnet contention is included.
Moderate: dates firm, performance and security severity unverified
Confidence is anchored by a single publisher whose factual spine (date, client version, BEP composition) is precise and easily falsifiable at activation, which supports the operational claims. It is capped by the absence of corroboration, the lack of any independent security review or exploitation record for BEP-682 and BEP-695, and performance figures that hold only under a controlled workload.
invest
Jane Street's $990M in Bitcoin ETFs looks like inventory, not conviction1 distinct publisher
invest
Washington licenses private hacking, and hands the contractor the liability1 distinct publisher
invest
RWA collateral in DeFi nears $4B, and 88% of tokenized assets still do nothing1 distinct publisher
invest
Strategy sold $333.7M of stock to pay its preferred holders, not to buy bitcoin1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 14, 2026