Product1 publisher2 min readPublished
iOS 27's Clean Up beat Photoshop on two of three object removals in a six-photo test
9to5Mac ran iOS 27's Clean Up against Photoshop 27.10.0 on the same six photos, and Apple's one-tap tool produced the better result in two of the three object removals. Photoshop won the hard one, and it is also where the reviewer went to fix Apple's miss.
The Product Desk · Product desk

What happened
- 9to5Mac shot six photos on an iPhone 17 Pro Max and edited them two ways, once in Photos on an iPhone 18 Pro Max running iOS 27.0 and once in Adobe Photoshop 27.10.0 on a MacBook Pro.
- Three of the six images tested object removal and three tested image extension, all supplied by a friend of the reviewer named Jurg from his travels in Switzerland and Europe.
- Apple's Clean Up gave the more believable removal of a red chair from in front of a yellow door, while Photoshop misaligned the door's rivets, dropped one and left more visual artifacts.
- Asked to take a red plate of bread off a red table, Clean Up reconstructed a reflection of the mug and jars with the spoon handle in the right place, and left only the crumbs behind.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- decision For a library of chairs against painted doors and plates on tabletops, the removal work now finishes on the phone, and a Photoshop seat becomes a cost you justify on the handful of hard frames.
- constraint Photos caps how far Extend will push an edge and Photoshop does not, so a job needing a wide expand cannot be completed on the device at any quality level.
- contradiction The review's own remedy for Clean Up's one visible chair error was to clone the rivet back in Photoshop.
The two tools missed in opposite directions, and the direction is more useful than the score. Photoshop was run with the prompt box left blank, and both times it came second there was shadow left over [3]. Under the chair the shadow stayed and, in the reviewer's words, "looks more like an oil stain" [8]. Under the removed breakfast plate the napkin "looks dirty or wet" [10]. Clean Up replaced the chair's shadow with a texture that matched the surrounding scene and held the existing lighting [6].
Clean Up's loss came on the one photo with people standing in front of plants. Removing the man on the right "left behind a garbled mess with plenty of obvious artifacts", 9to5Mac wrote, with the leaves too chunky, similar trouble where the woman with white hair stood behind white flowers, and a ghost of the dog's head against the stone wall [11]. Photoshop removed both people without difficulty [12].
Both tools were left at default settings. Clean Up stayed on Auto for all three removals, and Fast and High Quality were not used [2]. In Photoshop the objects were picked with the Object Selection or Lasso tool and Generative Fill ran with no text at all [3]. The person running the test has used Photoshop's generative features since 2023 and calls them hit or miss, though faster than masking, cloning and painting things out by hand [14]. A prompt describing the wall behind the chair is the obvious second attempt.
Score the three removal images and Clean Up takes two, Photoshop one [15]. What the seat buys is visible in the repairs. The single error 9to5Mac flagged on the chair was a rivet removed instead of rebuilt, which the review says most people would not notice and "would be an easy fix to clone back in with Photoshop" [13]. The crumbs Clean Up left on the table can be cleared by running Clean Up again over that area [9][19].
The sort worth running on your own last twenty edits has two axes. One is the background: regular geometry and flat texture, a painted door or a tabletop, against organic and irregular, foliage or hair. The other is the object being removed: free-standing, or overlapping a subject you need to keep. Every quadrant except organic-and-overlapping is the kind of job Clean Up handled here [6][9]. In this test that quadrant came up once in three, and that one went to Photoshop [17].
What to watch
- Whether Clean Up's High Quality setting, unused in this test, fixes the foliage and occluded-subject failure that sent the third photo to Photoshop.
- A rerun of the same three removals with a written Firefly prompt instead of a blank box, which is the variable the test held at default.
- The extension half of the comparison, where Photos' expansion cap sets the ceiling both tools were sized to.