Leadership1 publisher2 min readPublished
New York's worker-protection chief uses 14,000 Amazon van citations to push for direct hiring
New York's worker-protection chief, Samuel Levine, backed a report counting over 14,000 citations on Amazon delivery vehicles in five years. He wants a council bill that would make Amazon employ those drivers directly, cutting out the contractors who now pay the fines.
The Board Room · Leadership desk
What happened
- The count comes from The Alliance for a Greater New York, an advocacy group, which built its report on data the city collected.
- Amazon-affiliated vehicles also drew roughly 13,000 idling incidents over the same five years, logged through a system where residents report idling and the city reviews each complaint.
- Many of the drivers are independent contractors for Amazon Delivery Service Partners, yet they wear Amazon-branded clothes and must pass an Amazon background check.
- An Amazon spokesperson said the delivery partners are responsible for drivers obeying traffic laws and must cover the costs when drivers incur violations.
- Amazon opposes the Delivery Protection Act, according to testimony the company submitted in April.
Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- cost Should the Delivery Protection Act pass, Amazon would carry employment costs in New York that its delivery partners now hold, including the traffic violations those partners currently absorb.
- exposure Branded uniforms and Amazon-run background checks are how the report ties contracted drivers to Amazon, and any platform that dresses and vets contractors the same way in New York is open to the same argument.
- precedent A worker-protection commissioner citing traffic records in support of an employment-status bill gives the city a second way to go after delivery platforms, through street safety as well as pay.
Levine's remedy for a traffic record is an employment law. He said the findings point to a threat that Amazon's delivery model brings to the city's streets [13], and he urged the City Council to pass the Delivery Protection Act [15]. "The data is clear: an economy that rewards exploitation and shields powerful corporations from responsibility causes real harm to our communities," Levine said in a statement [14].
The report's complaint is about where responsibility lands after something goes wrong. "But when workers complain about dangerous conditions, Amazon points them to their DSP," it reads. "And if an Amazon van is responsible for a traffic crash, the victim may sue Amazon for damages, but Amazon could argue that only the DSP is to blame." [6] The crash point is written in the conditional, as an argument Amazon could make [6].
Blocking emergency vehicles, obstructing fire hydrants and speeding in school zones are all on the citation list, and the violations were spread across all five boroughs [2] [11]. Divided across the 637 license plates involved [11], the total comes to about 22 citations per plate over five years [1], or roughly four a year [2]. That rate needs a comparison with other commercial fleets on the same streets before it says much about Amazon. A hydrant citation and a school-zone speeding citation are also different kinds of risk, and Business Insider's account of the report does not break the 14,000 down by type [1].
Amazon's reply, in its board-deck version, is about driving. A spokesperson said the company works with DSPs "to promote safe delivery practices, from hands-on driver training to in-vehicle safety technology" [7], and it has trained roughly 110,000 drivers through its Last Mile Training Academy [8]. It is also investing in cargo ebikes and on-foot delivery [10]. Those answers cover how the vans are driven. The bill asks a different question: who employs the driver.
The most recent result of New York's crackdown on delivery services under Mayor Zohran Mamdani was a pay case. The city settled with DoorDash for $131.5 million over its pay practices last week [3] [4]. Business Insider's headline says Amazon vans "may be" the city's latest target [17]. I think the move from pay to safety is real in the city's argument. So far it consists of an advocacy group's report, one official's endorsement and a bill still before the council [1] [3] [15].
What to watch
- A City Council hearing or vote on the Delivery Protection Act, and whether Amazon's April opposition holds through any amendments.
- An enforcement action by the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection against Amazon or its delivery partners over the citation record.
- A New York crash lawsuit in which Amazon argues that only the delivery partner is liable.