Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

A single protein wires RAB5 trafficking to ROP7 signaling in Arabidopsis pollen

A team at Japan's National Institute for Basic Biology reports that REAP1/SWAP70 brings the plant-specific GTPase ROP7 onto RAB5 endosomes, and that weakening both GTPases together disturbs pollen at the one-cell stage.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying A single protein wires RAB5 trafficking to ROP7 signaling in Arabidopsis pollen

What happened

  • A team led by Emi Ito and Takashi Ueda at Japan's National Institute for Basic Biology reports a RAB5-REAP1-ROP7 pathway in Arabidopsis that matters for normal pollen development.
  • The protein sits on endosomes, and that position depends on its interactions with RAB5 and with specific membrane lipids.
  • Overexpressing RAB5 drew ROP7 onto endosomes, and in cells lacking REAP1 the same overexpression did not recruit it.
  • Reducing RAB5 and ROP7 function at the same time disturbed the transition from unicellular to bicellular pollen and left more grains unable to mature.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • capability A REAP1-null background plus an endosome localisation readout gives plant labs a concrete way to test which other trafficking and ROP pairs are connected, one pair at a time.
  • constraint The pollen defect appeared only when two GTPases were weakened together, so screens that knock out one gene at a time are poorly matched to finding pathways of this shape.
  • decision Plant experiments that perturb endosomal trafficking now have a ROP signalling side effect to control for, because ROP7's position depends on the state of RAB5.
  • precedent With one worked plant example, crosstalk between small GTPase families stops being an open question about animals only. Plant signalling papers are now expected to test it.

Overexpressing a trafficking GTPase changes a great deal of traffic at once. The informative half of the recruitment experiment is therefore the half that produced nothing: with REAP1 absent, raising RAB5 did not put ROP7 onto endosomes [8]. That comparison is what takes a correlation between two GTPases and pins it to a named protein in between.

The direction of the wiring is worth stating plainly. RAB5 regulates membrane trafficking, ROP7 belongs to the plant-specific family associated with cell morphogenesis [4], and endosomes are the compartments where trafficking routes converge [16]. Here RAB5 sets where ROP7 sits [8].

REAP1 works with both branches of the RAB5 family, the plant-only ARA6 and the canonical RAB5 proteins conserved across eukaryotes [5].

The reproductive result is a genetic interaction between two GTPases, and the perturbation was to RAB5 and ROP7 [9]. The announcement did not report the fraction of grains affected or the number of plants scored [14]. Read alongside the cell biology, the bridge is the most economical explanation for the pollen defect, and I would want a pollen count from plants lacking REAP1 before calling it the cause.

Emi Ito, the paper's first author and co-corresponding author [11], put the general argument this way: "The fact that different organisms have evolved crosstalk between small GTPases raises the possibility that connecting these molecular switches is a particularly efficient way to coordinate different cellular processes," she said [10].

One species cannot test that. The experiments are in Arabidopsis thaliana [2], ROPs exist only in plants [12], and crosstalk between GTPase families was documented in animal cells while the plant case stayed open [1]. Telling a plant invention apart from an old arrangement that was kept and rebuilt requires bridge proteins identified in lineages beyond Arabidopsis.

The paper establishes something narrower and solid: in one plant, at one step of pollen development, two GTPase families that were studied separately are connected by a protein that binds both [4][9]. The work is published in Nature Plants as "REAP1/AtSWAP70 integrates RAB5 and ROP signaling during sexual reproduction" [3].

What to watch

  • Whether the same endosome recruitment assay bridges other ROPs and other RAB5 members, or whether REAP1 is specific to the pair tested.
  • Whether ROP7 is GTP-loaded once it reaches the endosome, which would make the compartment a signalling site.
  • Whether the bridge operates in vegetative cells, where ROPs are associated with cell morphogenesis.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories