Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
ServiceTitan guides third-quarter revenue below the quarter that just beat the Street
ServiceTitan beat on revenue and EPS and nudged its full-year guide up by $4m. The stock fell 30% the next session, because the back half of fiscal 2027 is planned at roughly 15% growth against 25% a year ago.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- ServiceTitan reported fiscal second-quarter revenue of $292.8m on September 8, up 21% and ahead of both its own 18% guide and consensus, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.40 against the $0.36 expected.
- The stock closed down $24.46, or 30%, the following session, erasing more than $2bn of market capitalisation.
- Gross transaction volume growth fell from 23% in the first quarter to 17%, which management attributed to lead and job volume softening across the industry in May and June, concentrated in HVAC.
- Seven firms cut price targets within 24 hours, by 20% to 30%, and almost all of them kept their Buy ratings.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint ServiceTitan's revenue is a fixed slice of what its contractors bill, so its growth ceiling is set outside the company: three basis points a year of take-rate expansion cannot cover six points of volume deceleration.
- decision Management put resources behind Max and deferred new trades, so the mid-teens half reflects where the engineering budget went as well as where HVAC demand went, and undoing it means restarting an expansion already shelved.
- exposure Because operating margin is guided lower alongside growth, holders cannot be offered profit in exchange for the slower half.
- contradiction The same firms that cut numbers by 20% to 30% kept their Buy ratings, leaving an average target near $101 on a stock around $57, so the sell side has repriced the multiple while still modelling a near-double.
ServiceTitan takes about a penny of every dollar its contractors invoice. Revenue was 1.09% of the $26.8bn of gross transaction volume that ran through the platform in the quarter, up from 1.06% a year earlier [10]. Multiply the 17% volume growth by that 2.8% widening of the take rate and you get 20.3%, close to the 21% revenue growth reported [1]. Three basis points a year of take rate does not cover six points of volume deceleration [2]. SaaStr counts four straight quarters of deceleration, and says management confirmed on the call that the back half is planned at mid-teens growth after 22.7% in the first half [9][8].
Some of the back half is self-inflicted, on purpose. ServiceTitan does not bill the first quarter of a contract for Max, its agentic operating system, so the better Max sells now the more revenue it suppresses now, according to SaaStr's account of the quarter [12]. The company also deferred expansion into new trades to concentrate resources on Max [13]. So the guide contains a spending decision as well as soft demand: this half goes to proving one product to the existing contractor base, and not to opening adjacent trades.
The annual number went up while the equity went down. The raise was $4m, about 0.35% of the $1.1415bn midpoint [19][4]. ServiceTitan set fiscal 2027 guidance at $1.11bn to $1.12bn in March and has raised it twice since, a 2.4% increase at the midpoint, while the stock lost more than half its value [19][5].
A $24.46 fall at 30% puts the close near $57.07, against about $81.53 before the print [6]. More than $2bn of value gone on a 30% move implies roughly $6.7bn of market capitalisation before and $4.7bn after [7]. Against the $1.1415bn guide midpoint, that is a move from about 5.8 times current-year revenue to about 4.1, with $479.5m of cash on the balance sheet [8][16].
Six of the seven price-target cuts came with figures attached: TD Cowen to $100 from $125, Wells Fargo to $105, Piper Sandler and KeyBanc to $110, BMO to $90 from $103, Canaccord to $90 from $105 [20]. Those six average $100.83, which is 77% above the implied post-print close and 86% above the $54.16 low the stock hit on Friday [9][6].
In my view the guide is mostly end market and only partly Max. Revenue is a fixed cut of invoices, so soft HVAC demand reaches the income statement in the quarter it happens, and margin is guided down alongside it: $29m to $30m of non-GAAP operating income on $286m, about 10.3%, against 15.2% and $44.4m in the quarter just reported, which also produced $50.5m of free cash flow, up 47% [17][14][15]. The counter-thesis is timing. The unbilled first quarter defers revenue instead of losing it, so contracts signed this half bill from the next one and the fiscal 2028 comparisons start against a suppressed base [12]. Third-quarter volume settles it: GTV growth back near 20% with revenue above the $287m top end would date the problem to the billing calendar, and GTV growth below 17% would put it on the contractors [7][11].
What to watch
- Whether the first Max cohorts begin billing in Q4, and how much of the waived quarter shows up as revenue.
- Whether ServiceTitan restarts the deferred expansion into new trades, and what that timing says about Max adoption.
- Whether the firms that kept Buy ratings around $101 hold those targets if Q3 lands inside the guide.