Published Product3 min read
At $299 twice over, entry-level AR glasses stop competing on the panel
Viture's Pro 2 lands at the same price as the X by Xreal a01+ with much the same spec sheet. What separates them now is a $130 dock, an iPhone dongle, and whether the companion app works.
Not a builder's beat, but builders have a standing stake in it.See today for builders

What happened
- Viture released the $299 Viture Pro 2 AR display glasses hot on the heels of the X by Xreal (XBX) a01+, at the same price point and with a similar feature set.
- The Viture Pro 2 has an MSRP of $299, compared with $449 for the first-generation Viture Pro; the Pro 2 is also described as sharper, brighter and lighter than that first Pro pair.
- The Pro 2 is $150 cheaper than the first-generation Viture Pro, a reduction of about 33 percent.
- The Viture Pro 2 display is 1080p with a 120Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 1,600 nits, the same peak brightness as the X by Xreal a01+; the panel is a micro OLED.
- The RayNeo Air 4 Pro maxes out at 1,200 nits.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
Viture has released the Pro 2 display glasses at $299, arriving just after the X by Xreal a01+ at the same price with what Gizmodo's reviewer describes as a similar feature set [1]. When two vendors independently land on the same number with overlapping specs, the interesting part of the product stops being the display and starts being everything bolted onto it.
The convergence is close to literal. The Pro 2 runs a 1080p micro OLED at 120Hz with a peak brightness of 1,600 nits, which is the same peak the a01+ hits [4]. RayNeo's Air 4 Pro tops out at 1,200 nits [5], about a third dimmer at peak than either $299 pair [6]. Gizmodo's reviewer judged the Pro 2 sharper in practice than both the a01+ and the Air 4 Pro [7], with Viture attributing that to the micro OLED panel and a processing stack it calls UltraClarity 3.0, meant to reduce blurry corners and color fringing [8]. The same reviewer also said watching movies on the Pro 2 felt about the same as on the comparably priced Xreal and RayNeo glasses, if slightly sharper, with no edge blurring or distracting artifacts [9]. Those two statements are the whole story of a commodity tier: a measurable edge that a buyer will struggle to notice.
The price history explains how fast the floor fell. The first Viture Pro carried a $449 MSRP [2], so the Pro 2 is $150 and roughly a third cheaper one generation later [3]. Two differentiators survive the cut. The Pro 2 drops HDR10, which the reviewer found made the dynamic color range perhaps slightly less robust without feeling like a real absence [10]. And its virtual screen is listed at 146 inches against 201 inches for the Air 4 Pro, a gap the reviewer says does translate even though virtual size figures are mostly marketing [11].
The real cost sits in the accessory column. Console play requires Viture's $130 mobile dock to get HDMI into the glasses, which is how the reviewer drove a PlayStation 5 [12]; a handheld gaming PC with DisplayPort over USB-C needs nothing, but the Switch and PlayStation do not output video over USB-C and therefore do [13]. That puts a console setup at $429 [14], which adds about 43 percent to the price of the glasses [16] and lands just $20 under the previous generation's MSRP [15]. The reviewer notes every pair in the category deals with the same caveat [17], which is precisely why dock pricing is now a competitive variable rather than a footnote.
Software is the other one. The companion app is described as buggy at times [18], and using every feature on an iPhone requires an expensive dongle [19]. Against that, the Pro 2 is light and comfortable and includes diopter adjustment for people who need vision correction [20], and the reviewer ran Star Wars: Jedi Survivor at 120Hz and Gears of War: Reloaded without complaint [21].
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Viture released the $299 Viture Pro 2 AR display glasses hot on the heels of the X by Xreal (XBX) a01+, at the same price point and with a similar feature set.
- [2]
The Viture Pro 2 has an MSRP of $299, compared with $449 for the first-generation Viture Pro; the Pro 2 is also described as sharper, brighter and lighter than that first Pro pair.
ReportedView cited source - [4]
The Viture Pro 2 display is 1080p with a 120Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 1,600 nits, the same peak brightness as the X by Xreal a01+; the panel is a micro OLED.
ReportedView cited source - [7]
Gizmodo's reviewer said the Pro 2 feel sharper than budget competitors including the a01+ from X by Xreal and the RayNeo Air 4 Pro.
ReportedSource: Gizmodo reviewer's own experience; he notes he has not tested the first-generation Viture ProView cited source - [8]
According to Viture, the Pro 2 are sharper than the previous generation because of factors including the micro OLED display and what Viture calls UltraClarity 3.0, which is meant to reduce blurry corners and visual artifacts such as color fringing.
Sources & coverage · 1 publisher
The reporting this story was synthesized from, earliest first. Every link goes to the original.
- gizmodo.comJames PeroAug 13Viture Pro 2 Review: A Dark Horse in the Entry-Level AR Glasses Race
Additional citations
- Gizmodo review by its reviewer
- Gizmodo reviewer's own experience; he notes he has not tested the first-generation Viture Pro
- Viture, as reported by Gizmodo
- Gizmodo reviewer



