Published · 4d agoInvest3 min read
Kalshi asks the CFTC to put crypto's perpetual futures on US stocks and copper
Two filings dated August 18 would import the structure behind an estimated 93% of crypto derivatives volume into equities and metals. Neither is approved, and the book is still small.
Context for builders, not their beat.See today for builders

What happened
- On August 18, Kalshi, a federally regulated exchange, submitted two proposals to the CFTC for approval of perpetual futures contracts based on a major US stock index and on copper.
- Researchers from Cornell University estimate that perpetual futures comprise 93% of all crypto derivatives trading.
- Perpetual futures have no expiry date, allowing traders to hold long or short leveraged positions indefinitely without rolling contracts, with funding payments made periodically to keep the perpetual price aligned with the underlying market.
- Economist Robert Shiller proposed a structure for perpetual futures trading in 1993.
- Shiller wrote in 1993: "A perpetual futures contract is proposed that would cash settle every day..."
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
On August 18, Kalshi filed two proposals with the CFTC to list perpetual futures on a major US stock index and on copper [1]. If the agency clears them, the contract type that Cornell University researchers estimate accounts for 93% of all crypto derivatives trading [2] stops being a crypto artefact and becomes a listed product in regulated traditional markets.
The mechanics are the point. A perpetual has no expiry, so a leveraged position can be held indefinitely without rolling, and periodic funding payments keep the contract price tethered to the underlying [3]. That design is not a crypto invention: the economist Robert Shiller proposed a perpetual futures structure in 1993, writing that "a perpetual futures contract is proposed that would cash settle every day" [4][5]. Crypto is simply where it found volume [6].
The specifics of the filings are more interesting than the headline. The US500 contract would track the MerQube US Large Cap Index, the 500 largest US-listed companies weighted by float-adjusted market cap [7]. COPPERPERP would reference the current price of copper in dollars per pound using the Pyth Network's XCU/USD feed [8]. So a CFTC-regulated metals contract would settle off a crypto-native oracle feed, which is the sort of detail that consumes review time. Both filings sit under Regulation 40.3, meaning Kalshi cannot launch until the CFTC affirmatively approves [9].
There is a precedent path here. On May 29 the CFTC greenlit Kalshi's BTCPERP and said other perpetual contracts would be reviewed under Regulation 40.3 [10]. Bitcoin perps launched in early June and were followed by Ether, XRP and others [11]; Cryptopolitan reports Kalshi now offers perpetuals across 13 cryptocurrencies [12]. The equity and copper filings landed 81 days after that first approval [13], which is a fast escalation from one crypto contract to an asset class where retail leverage carries a different political weight.
Size argues for restraint. Cryptopolitan reports Kalshi's daily open interest hit an all-time high of $17.98 million [14]. That is a rounding error next to the venues Kalshi would be competing with, and it means the filings are a bet on structure rather than a defence of an existing franchise. Coinbase Institutional, in its 2026 Crypto Market Outlook, argued that "equity perps could become the preferred choice for a new generation of retail traders," citing constant accessibility and efficient use of capital, and claiming perps are becoming components of lending, collateral and hedging systems rather than just leverage wrappers [15][16][17]. That is a sell-side thesis, not a finding.
What to watch: whether the CFTC treats a 40.3 filing on equities the way it treated one on Bitcoin, and how it handles a settlement price sourced from Pyth. Watch also the litigation overhang. Cryptopolitan notes CME's legal challenge could affect Kalshi's expansion [18]. And watch open interest, because if a regulated equity perp exists and the book stays in the tens of millions, the migration thesis is answered by indifference rather than by regulators.
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
On August 18, Kalshi, a federally regulated exchange, submitted two proposals to the CFTC for approval of perpetual futures contracts based on a major US stock index and on copper.
ReportedView cited source - [2]
Researchers from Cornell University estimate that perpetual futures comprise 93% of all crypto derivatives trading.
- [3]
Perpetual futures have no expiry date, allowing traders to hold long or short leveraged positions indefinitely without rolling contracts, with funding payments made periodically to keep the perpetual price aligned with the underlying market.
ReportedView cited source - [4]
Economist Robert Shiller proposed a structure for perpetual futures trading in 1993.
ReportedView cited source - [5]
Shiller wrote in 1993: "A perpetual futures contract is proposed that would cash settle every day..."
Sources & coverage · 2 publishers
The reporting this story was synthesized from, earliest first. Every link goes to the original.
- cryptopolitan.comAshish Kumar4d agoKalshi seeks approval to bring crypto-style perps to stocks and copper
- decrypt.coJason Nelson4d agoKalshi Pushes Beyond Prediction Markets With Copper Perpetual Futures
Additional citations
- Cornell University researchers, cited by Cryptopolitan
- Robert J. Shiller, 1993
- Cryptopolitan
- Coinbase Institutional, 2026 Crypto Market Outlook



