Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

A drying-tolerant bacterium's byproduct gives forgotten laundry its wet-rag smell

A phys.org explainer traces the wet-rag odor to a compound made by Moraxella osloensis on damp cloth, and puts the remedy in drying time, wash temperature and fiber choice. None of the studies it cites reports an effect size.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying A drying-tolerant bacterium's byproduct gives forgotten laundry its wet-rag smell

What happened

  • A Japanese study in 2012 traced the wet-rag laundry smell to a compound produced by Moraxella osloensis, the bacterium a phys.org explainer names as the one most responsible for the odor.
  • The same study found the species tolerates drying and ultraviolet exposure unusually well, so it can survive a wash cycle and then multiply in a load left sitting wet in the drum.
  • A 2025 study found persistent microbial biofilms inside household washing machines, concentrated around door seals and in the detergent drawers of front-loading models, that detergent alone struggles to remove.
  • The explainer's prevention advice is to move a finished load to the dryer or the line within roughly 30 to 60 minutes and to dry it fully and fast with good airflow.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost Cold cycles save energy on the meter, and some of that saving goes back into machine upkeep, because the explainer says cool water lets odor bacteria persist in the drum as well as in the clothes.
  • exposure Anyone treating the smell with more detergent is dosing the clothes while the door seal keeps reseeding them.
  • decision Choosing moisture-wicking synthetics commits the owner to a stricter drying routine, because the explainer reports that permafunk in those garments survives repeated washing.

Polyester's problem is that it repels water and absorbs oil [10]. Sebum and the oily fraction of sweat lodge in the fiber, and those are the compounds odor bacteria feed on [10]. Cotton binds water instead, which leaves fewer sites inside the fabric for oily residue to sit [9]. A recent Canadian study modeled how odor compounds migrate from sweat into fibers and found polyester retains substantially more of them than cotton or viscose [11]. That was a migration model, not a wear trial with a sniff panel, and the explainer does not name the compound behind the wet-rag smell or say how much more polyester holds [21].

Slow drying adds a second organism. Fungi move in when a load stays wet or dries badly in a room without airflow, and mold and mildew emit their own volatiles, geosmin among them [7]. A human nose picks up geosmin at a few hundred parts per trillion [8], and 300 parts per trillion is 0.0003 parts per million [20]. The musty smell and the wet-rag smell are different molecules from different organisms, and both start with the same delay in getting the load dry [7].

The 2025 biofilm result changes where an owner should look. Detergent alone struggles with the films that build up around door seals and in the detergent drawers of front-loaders, and each cycle can put some of that population back onto clean laundry [4][5]. The countermeasure in the explainer is a hot maintenance cycle, periodic wiping of seals and drawers, and boosters carrying oxygen bleach and enzymes to break the film down [16].

The most controlled evidence cited comes from hospital laundries, where the best reduction in bacterial loads came from combining heat with thorough drying [18]. What that work measured was bacterial load; perceived odor is a separate measurement. A care label can also rule the heat out. Some textiles do not survive 60C, and detergent enzymes each have their own optimum temperature [19].

In my view the timing instruction is the one intervention here that holds whatever the fabric or the machine, since it starves both organisms of the warm, wet, sebum-rich conditions they need: out of the drum within roughly 30 to 60 minutes, then dried fully and fast with airflow [15][6]. For a load that already smells, the explainer prescribes rewashing at the hottest temperature the label allows, with an optional pre-soak in concentrated household vinegar as an antimicrobial [14].

What to watch

  • A wear trial putting worn polyester and cotton garments in front of a sniff panel would test the Canadian migration model against a measured retention difference.
  • Whether the 2025 biofilm work is followed by comparisons of front-loader seals against top-loading machines, and by counts showing where in the machine the film sits.
  • Any measurement of how odor risk changes across the 30 to 60 minute window would turn the explainer's timing advice into a threshold.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories