Security1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
DecryptAds cross-references ads.txt, app-ads.txt and sellers.json into one searchable view. In ESPN's files it counts 143 ad partners and 19 registered data broker domains.
The Watch · Security desk

Compiled by The WatchSomething wrong?How this is made
A free service called DecryptAds has launched, scraping and correlating the adtech disclosure files that websites and apps publish, and turning them into something you can query [1][2]. That matters for defenders because those files are permission lists the publisher wrote, so for the first time an outside party can hand any organisation a list of the data brokers and ad networks its own properties have authorised to collect from its users [2][1].
The underlying data has always been semi-public but hard to parse, and much of it stayed inside large advertising platforms [3]. The files in scope are ads.txt, which names the adtech companies and data brokers permitted to run ads or harvest data from a site; app-ads.txt, which does the same for mobile and smart TV apps; and buyers.json/sellers.json, which name the entities buying, selling or reselling inventory [2].
Zach Edwards, chief research officer at DecryptAds and a threat researcher at Infoblox, said he and two other founders built it because the data is only useful when cross-referenced [4][5]. "It's an adtech tool but we're trying to approach adtech from a security perspective," Edwards said, describing the intended users as privacy and security teams that have been "dramatically underserved" [6]. The stated use cases are tracing malicious ads back to their source, identifying ad networks in adversarial nations, and spotting AI-generated slop sites and apps [7]. The service's own explanation of why single-file review fails is the most useful part of the pitch: "Supply-chain integrity issues rarely live in a single file," it says, pointing to broken cross-references between ads.txt, app-ads.txt and sellers.json, cloned declaration sets on unrelated domains, seller removals that only make sense across exchanges, and supply paths in bid logs that never appear in any publisher's authorised-seller list [8].
The concrete example is worth reading as an audit template. According to DecryptAds, a search for espn.com returns 143 ad partners and 19 registered data broker domains declared in its ads.txt and app-ads.txt files [9]. Almost half of those brokers, so roughly nine, disclose collecting geolocation from visitors who are not blocking ads, and three disclose device fingerprints and sensitive personal information [10][2]. That broker detail exists at all because California, Oregon, Texas and Vermont recently passed laws requiring data brokers to register if they buy or sell data on residents of those states [11].
DecryptAds also flags partners based in geo-risk areas including China and Russia, plus countries with strong financial and political ties to them such as Cyprus and the UAE [12]. It says espn.com works with four entities based in Russia, China or the UAE [13], among them Between Digital, which lists a New York address but which DecryptAds flags as Russian on the basis that its publisher offers are processed through Alfa Bank, Russia's largest private commercial bank and a US sanctions target since 2022 [14][15]. KrebsOnSecurity reported that Between Digital and its founder did not respond to requests for comment before publication [16]. Searches for armytimes.com, airforcetimes.com, defensenews.com, navytimes.com, marinecorpstimes.com and federaltimes.com show all six permit Between Digital to serve ads and track users, along with two UAE entities and one in Panama [17].
Worth watching: whether Between Digital replies [16]; and whether security teams treat their own ads.txt as an asset inventory item rather than a marketing artefact, since it is a file their organisation signs and publishes [1].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
One of those entities is the adtech firm Between Digital, which lists a New York address; the DecryptAds dossier flags it as a Russian firm, showing its publisher offers are processed through Alfa Bank.
A powerful and free new service called DecryptAds (decryptads.com) has newly launched and scrapes and correlates adtech data to make it simple to learn about entities that track users.
DecryptAds says it constantly scrapes the files websites and apps make publicly available to disclose companies permitted to run ads or collect user data: ads.txt (adtech companies and data brokers that may run ads or harvest data from the site), app-ads.txt (entities that can harvest data from or display ads on mobile and smart TV apps), and buyers.json/sellers.json (entities buying, selling or reselling ad inventory).
The adtech information is already semi-public but is not easily parsed, and traditionally much of it has remained walled away in the hands of large advertising platforms.
Zach Edwards is chief research officer for DecryptAds and a threat researcher at the security company Infoblox.
Edwards said he and two other founders decided the service was needed because the adtech data in these files is generally only useful when cross-referenced to build a more complete picture of the advertising ecosystem for each website or app.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
One reputable outlet, reproducible file basis, vendor-supplied findings
The structural claims rest on artefacts anyone can inspect: ads.txt, app-ads.txt and sellers.json are publisher-published files, and the state broker-registration laws are named. The reporting includes a first-party interview with a named co-founder and direct quotes from the product. But every entity-level finding — partner counts, broker collection categories, geo-risk labels, the Russian attribution of Between Digital — is reproduced from a single new vendor's product by a single publisher, with no methodology disclosed, no second outlet, and no reply from the flagged company.
Public launch evidenced; no usage of the tool itself reported
What is documented is a launch: a free public service exists and returns detailed profiles for queried domains. Nothing in the supplied source measures uptake of DecryptAds — no user, query, customer or integration figures, and no publisher reported acting on its findings. The large numbers present (about 55,000 Between Digital partner sites; Opera's 27 registered brokers) describe the adtech ecosystem the tool observes, not adoption of the tool.
Mildly overstated: 'powerful and free' framing outruns verification and uptake
The mechanism and the file-level findings are modestly stated and checkable, which keeps the gap small. Overstatement comes from framing a day-one product as a settled capability while its most alarming outputs — geo-risk jurisdiction labels and a Russian attribution inferred from a payment rail — are unverified vendor inferences, the flagged firm never responded, and there is no evidence anyone is yet using the service.
Founder is the sole quoted expert on his own newly launched product
The narrative's authority comes from Zach Edwards, who is simultaneously DecryptAds' chief research officer, one of three founders, and a threat researcher at Infoblox; the product's own site copy supplies the framing of the problem it solves, and its dossiers supply the findings. That alignment gives the source a clear interest in demonstrating that existing supply-chain policing is inadequate. No counter-interest is represented: neither the flagged intermediary nor the named publishers speak in the piece.
Mechanism solid, entity findings provisional
Confidence is high that the files, the cross-referencing service and the state registration laws are as described, and that the quoted numbers are what DecryptAds returned on the reporting date. It is materially lower on whether specific labels — geo-risk jurisdiction, 'Russian firm', broker collection categories — are accurate, given one publisher, one vendor, no disclosed methodology and no response from the named company.
leadership
Disney swaps raises for discounted stock and a full health-plan re-enrollment1 distinct publisher
invest
The Lakers deal now turns on trust law, not basketball1 distinct publisher
security
Ukraine's asset agency was attacked on the tender calendar, not the network map2 distinct publishers
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 14, 2026