Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

Gold led all assets in 13 of 54 years since 1972, while growing 4.85% a year in real terms

Of Dollars And Data ran nine asset classes through BullionVault's 1972-2025 returns. Gold had the most winning single years of the nine, while a dollar in the S&P 500 grew to $35.90 in real terms against gold's $12.89.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying Gold led all assets in 13 of 54 years since 1972, while growing 4.85% a year in real terms

What happened

  • Gold posted the highest return of the nine asset classes in 13 of the 54 years from 1972 to 2025, roughly one year in four, more single-year wins than anything else in the study.
  • A dollar put into the S&P 500 in 1972 was worth $35.90 in real terms by the end of 2025, the best overall result of the nine classes examined.
  • The next three on total growth per dollar invested were gold at $12.89, REITs at $12.26 and international stocks at $11.27, all in real terms.
  • Commodities turned the 1972 dollar into 42 cents in real terms while running a 14% annual standard deviation, the only negative real return in the set.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Hit rate and weight are separate questions: the asset that led a quarter of all years ended with about 36 cents on the index's dollar.
  • decision Anyone justifying a gold sleeve from this record funds it out of the compounder, and roughly 2 percentage points a year of real return is the price of that choice.
  • exposure An investor whose spending lands inside high-inflation stretches is exposed to the mean-median gap, since the commodities edge in those years shows in the average and disappears in the median.
  • contradiction The same 54 years make gold both the most-winning and the joint most-losing asset, so the record supports the case for holding it and the case against it depending on which count is cited.

Compounded out, the S&P 500's 54-year record works out to 6.86% a year after inflation, and gold's to 4.85% [1][2]. Two percentage points a year, held for 54 years, is the whole 2.8-to-1 spread in ending wealth [9][3]. Gold led in 13 of those years [1].

Gold also tied commodities for last place most often, at 11 years each [6]. Counting both ends, it was either the best or the worst asset in 24 of the 54 years, about 44% [4]. Its annual standard deviation was 24.7%, the highest of the nine [7]. Gold gained 106% in 1979 and lost 37.6% in 1981 [7]; the two moves in sequence leave 28.5% [5].

In years when CPI ran above 4%, commodities' average annual return was about 2.9 percentage points higher than in low-inflation years, while the median was basically identical [9]. When an average moves and the median does not, a small number of years produced the difference. The S&P 500 went the other way, 11 points lower on the average and 17 points lower on the median in high-inflation years [10]. International stocks, REITs, corporate bonds and 10-year Treasuries were all roughly 8 points lower or worse [11]. Gold had the largest average gap of the nine at 5.6 points [12], and Of Dollars And Data wrote that "Gold is a complicated edge case." [13]

In my view these 54 years argue for owning the compounder and paying the high-inflation years as they arrive. Gold led the table more often than anything else in the nine series, and it paid 2 points a year of real return to do it [9][2]. The counter-thesis sits in the same table. An investor whose spending falls inside the high-inflation stretches lives on what those years pay, and commodities and gold were the two assets whose returns improved when CPI ran above 4% [9][12]. The full-period numbers cut against both: commodities' 14% standard deviation bought minus 1.59% a year in real terms across the period [5][6], and Of Dollars And Data wrote of commodities, "this is an asset class I make sure to avoid" [14].

Cash sat at the other end. Three-month T-bills turned the 1972 dollar into $1.14 real by 2025, which is 0.24% a year [8][7]. The published text breaks off during the discussion of gold's median return in high inflation, before it reaches the optimal portfolio the analysis set out to identify [15].

What to watch

  • Whether the completed analysis publishes optimal portfolio weights, and whether gold appears in them at all given its 4.85% real annualised return.
  • Gold's median return during high-inflation years, and whether it moves with the 5.6-point average gap.
  • A terminal value for U.S. homes, the ninth asset class in the comparison, which would show whether housing beat gold's $12.89.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories