Product1 publisher3 min readPublished
VodafoneThree asks planners for two more metres on every rooftop 5G site
Two UK operators told Connected Britain that planning height limits have held back 5G, with Ookla putting UK 5G availability at 45.2 percent of the population against Denmark's 83.9 percent. Neither operator sized the effect.
The Product Desk · Product desk
What happened
- VodafoneThree and Virgin Media O2 told the Connected Britain event that UK planning restrictions have hindered the rollout of newer technologies including 5G.
- An Ookla report cited at the event put UK 5G availability at 45.2 percent of the population, near the bottom of 30 countries recorded, with Denmark top at 83.9 percent.
- Ofcom's Andy Sutton said the regulator is looking at whether a change in legislation can help operators bridge the gap between affordable pricing and investment returns.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint A UK feature that needs 5G Standalone is limited by antenna decisions taken site by site, and the population that can use it is smaller than the handset install base, because no 5G SA coverage figure was given at all.
- contradiction Operators offered planning limits and thin consumer pricing in the same session, and neither was tied to the 45.2 percent figure, so a reader cannot tell which change would move coverage.
- decision Roadmaps that treat 5G as the baseline now need a specified 4G path for the 54.8 percent of the UK population outside availability, and that path defines what the feature actually delivers.
- precedent If the fix runs through legislation, relief for 5G+ build plans arrives on a government timetable that no operator controls.
More than half the UK population, on Ookla's count, sits outside 5G availability: 45.2 percent have it [2], which leaves 54.8 percent who do not [1]. Those are the people a 4G fallback serves. A UK feature plan should start there.
The rule the operators named at Connected Britain is a height ceiling on rooftop upgrades [1]. "If you put additional antennas because of the additional technology, we need to increase that by a few meters. We're saying allow us to increase it to eight meters," said Andrea Donà, chief network officer at VodafoneThree [4][6]. Six metres to eight is a third more height [3]. For ground-based masts he asked for 25 or 30 metres in place of the current 20 [5]. That is 25 to 50 percent taller [4].
Virgin Media O2 said the same thing in different words. "I do think that the planning regime has been a significant structural barrier to the fast deployment of 5G networks, in particular, needing higher, wider masts," said Wendy Shearer, the operator's head of public affairs [7][8].
What the reporting does not carry is the size of the effect. Nobody put a share of the 38.7-point gap between the UK and Denmark [2] on the height cap, and Denmark's own planning rules are not described [15]. The 45.2 percent measures 5G availability, not 5G Standalone availability, and the operators discussed 5G SA rollout without giving a coverage percentage for it [16]. A feature that needs network slicing or a guaranteed uplink depends on that second number.
The same session offered a second explanation with nothing to do with planners. VodafoneThree says its average revenue per user is below 20 pounds a month [9], which is under 240 pounds a year per subscriber to fund the upgrade [5]. "We are running to stand still, and we are in a highly, highly competitive market where consumer pricing has been very stable and low," said Shearer [10]. George Robinson, VodafoneThree's head of government affairs, said US ARPU is significantly higher, which he said makes it easier to draw a return on 5G investment [11].
Ofcom framed the problem as a balance between prices and investment. "So there's a very fine line to draw between affordability and that low investment approach, and that's exactly what we're working on at the moment," said Andy Sutton, the regulator's director of technology and mobile [12].
For a team shipping into the UK, two lines per feature settle most of this. First, what the feature does when the handset falls back to 4G, written as a behaviour and not as a degradation note. Second, where the coverage percentage in the plan came from, and whether it counts 5G or 5G SA [16]. If it came from a rollout deck, the ship date depends on how tall someone is allowed to build a rooftop mount [4].
What to watch
- Whether Ofcom's look at legislation turns into a specific proposal to raise the permitted rooftop height from six metres to eight.
- Whether any UK operator publishes 5G Standalone population coverage separately from headline 5G availability.
- Whether VodafoneThree's sub-20-pounds ARPU moves in either direction as the merged network invests in 5G+.