Product1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
A UK consultancy says its invoicing software went up more than sixteenfold after Bending Spoons took over. The pricing model changed a year ago; customers on annual terms are only finding out now.
The Product Desk · Product desk

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Richard Haldenby, who runs the UK consultancy Salentis, told the BBC that his monthly Harvest bill went from $130 to $2,110 after the time-tracking and invoicing app moved to a new pricing model [1]. That is a 1,523% increase on the same workflow, or an extra $23,760 a year if annualised [1][2], and it is the cleanest available illustration of a line item that was too small to govern becoming large enough to require a decision.
The mechanism matters more than the number. Until the change, Harvest charged a flat monthly fee per user, and customers could add or remove seats as staffing moved, paying only for people who needed access [5]. The replacement is usage-based: charges can now key off the number of active projects, clients and tasks, plus the revenue a business invoices through the platform [6]. Every one of those is a variable a growing services firm cannot hold flat, which is the point.
Harvest was acquired by the Italian company Bending Spoons in 2025 and changed its pricing the following year, according to the BBC [3]. The reporting also says many customers who pay annually are only discovering the increase now, as renewals come due [4]. That lag is the operational lesson: an annual contract does not protect you from a repricing, it just defers the moment you learn about it, and it removes the monthly signal that would have shown the change while there was still time to plan a migration.
Salentis runs up to 15 staff in the UK at any one time, with sister companies in the US and Australia, and has used Harvest for at least 15 years [8]. Haldenby said accepting the increase would double his IT spend for the year and was unaffordable [7]. He was then offered a discount taking next year to $1,309, payable up front [9]. That is still roughly ten times the old rate, and about $15,708 of cash committed in advance [4]. He said it would only delay the inevitable and that he is planning to migrate to a similar but less good service [10]. Others report the same shape of change: the BBC cites a US customer whose annual charge went from $2,800 to $23,000, an 8.2-fold rise [2][3], and describes increases of as much as 1500%, with one person calling it "daylight robbery" [18].
Two pricing specialists told the BBC what they thought was happening. Mark Peacock of PriceMaker said Harvest had "completely failed at the transparency test" and that there is no way for a customer to work out the cost until the bill arrives at the end of the month [11]; he said many users report a tenfold increase [12]. Damian Foks of Valueships called it a clear shift from growth to monetisation, likely a result of new ownership [13]. Bending Spoons has acquired more than 50 major tech firms since 2013, including Evernote, Vimeo and WeTransfer [14], raised Evernote subscription prices sharply after its 2022 acquisition alongside layoffs in the US and Chile [15], and tightened free tiers at WeTransfer and Vimeo while moving legacy users onto more expensive plans [16].
The BBC has approached Harvest for comment [17]. Watch whether the discount offered to Haldenby becomes a general retention tier, and check your own stack for tools whose owner changed hands in the last two years and whose renewal is priced on a metric that grows with your revenue.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
The BBC reported that the app hiked bills by as much as 1500%, with one person calling it "daylight robbery".
Richard Haldenby, head of UK consultancy firm Salentis, told the BBC his monthly Harvest bill had risen from $130 to $2,110.
One person in the US reported that their annual Harvest charge went from $2,800 to $23,000.
Harvest was acquired by the Italian tech company Bending Spoons in 2025, and changed its pricing structure the following year.
Many businesses who pay annually are only now finding out about the increase, as their payment is coming up for renewal.
Until the change, businesses paid a flat monthly fee for each user, and could add or remove users as their staffing needs changed, meaning they only paid for the people who needed access.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
One outlet, one documented customer case plus attributed expert commentary
All material comes from a single BBC report. It carries one named customer with specific before/after figures, two named pricing consultants, and a described change in billing metric - but the second customer case is an anonymous online post, no rate card or vendor documentation is shown, and Harvest and Bending Spoons provided no response, so the mechanism and breadth of the increase are attested rather than documented.
Pricing change live and billing, customer response only anecdotal
The usage-based model is demonstrably in force - it is generating invoices and renewal quotes, and one long-tenured customer has been offered a retention discount. What is not measurable from this material is scale: no count of affected accounts, no churn or retention figures, and only one stated (not completed) migration.
Headline multiple is the worst documented case
The 1,500% framing rests on the single named customer's 16.2x jump, while the analyst in the same piece cites about ten-fold for many users and the other reported case is about 8.2x. The underlying facts - a real repricing, real bills, real renewal surprises - are solid, so the overstatement is modest and mostly a matter of the extreme case standing in for the distribution, compounded by the missing vendor account.
Visible interests on most sides, disclosed by role
The named customer is mid-negotiation and publicly rejecting a renewal, which strengthens his position; both critics are principals of pricing consultancies whose visibility benefits from commentary on a high-profile repricing; the acquirer has a direct monetization interest consistent with its stated track record; and consumer-outrage coverage is naturally amplified by the publisher. Roles are disclosed in the text, so the incentives are legible rather than hidden.
Core facts firm, breadth and motive unresolved
High confidence that Harvest moved to usage-based pricing after the Bending Spoons acquisition and that some customers face very large increases surfacing at annual renewal. Lower confidence in how widely the increases fall, the typical multiple, and the stated strategic rationale, given one publisher, one named case and no vendor response.
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 20, 2026