Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

String theorists propose that a record KM3NeT neutrino came from a black hole hidden in a fifth dimension

Dieter Lüst and co-authors argue KM3NeT's record neutrino, about 35 times more energetic than any before, came from a black hole exploding in a fifth dimension. The idea explains the missing photons but rests on one detection and an unproven extra dimension.

The Scientist · Science desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying String theorists propose that a record KM3NeT neutrino came from a black hole hidden in a fifth dimension
Photo: wisc.edu

What happened

  • The particle reached Earth in February 2023 and was recorded by KM3NeT, a neutrino telescope still under construction off the coast of Sicily.
  • Other instruments should have detected photons from the same event and did not, a gap Lüst said the new scenario would "completely resolve."
  • An earlier proposal from MIT's Alexandra Klipfel and David Kaiser put a dying primordial black hole within 2,000 astronomical units of the solar system.
  • The Physical Review D paper, published September 28, has the black hole first forming from cosmic strings, light-years-long cracks in spacetime.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint With only one event, the blazar, nearby-black-hole and fifth-dimension accounts can be compared only on how much each explains, and none of them can yet fail a second measurement.
  • capability Asteroid-mass primordial black holes would be evaporating in the present epoch, so a neutrino telescope can in principle catch one dying today and test whether they exist.
  • precedent A peer-reviewed paper now cites one astrophysical neutrino as support for a string-theory extra dimension, making similar claims likely for each further anomalous KM3NeT event.

Every explanation of this particle rests on a single event [1]. Some theorists have put it down to a blazar, a type of highly active galaxy [3]. Others have reached for a primordial black hole. Such an object would have formed in the universe's first moments. It would lose mass through Hawking radiation and end in a burst of radiation and neutrinos [4].

The timing works on paper. Dan Hooper, a cosmologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and others have suggested that processes such as inflation could have left regions dense enough to collapse into black holes of many masses [14]. The smallest would have evaporated long ago. Those with roughly the mass of an asteroid would be evaporating now [14]. Klipfel and Kaiser's earlier proposal, a black hole expiring near the solar system, depends on that population [15]. Other ideas have failed to fully explain the event, and the concept "still looks really beautifully consistent," Kaiser said [16]. Scientific American's account does not estimate how often a primordial black hole should die that close to the Sun, and it does not link these objects to dark matter.

The new paper keeps the exploding black hole and moves it into a fifth dimension [5]. The move is aimed at the missing photons [6]. Lüst, of the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich, describes the extra dimension as "an extra circle" about one micron wide. In his description it is curled up at every point of ordinary space and may arise as a side effect of dark energy [8]. "The only force which can penetrate the fifth dimension is gravity," Lüst said [9]. In his account, a black hole inside it would let only neutrinos escape into our universe [7]. Cumrun Vafa, a Harvard string theorist, said that "when the size of the black holes are smaller than a micron, they can sit inside other points in the extra dimension" [11].

In my view the absence of photons checks that the model is consistent but does little to test it, because the fifth dimension was introduced to keep everything except neutrinos out of our universe [7]. Whether that dimension exists is still disputed. Vafa argues it is "not only plausible; it is derived, in some sense, with minimal assumptions from string theory ideas," a case he made in a preprint posted in 2022 and published in 2023 [10]. Hooper is not persuaded. "We don't know that there is a fifth dimension," he said [12]. Lüst, Vafa and their colleagues, he said, "seem to be making some very strong statements that I wouldn't be able to defend" [13].

What to watch

  • A second KM3NeT neutrino near this energy, and whether other instruments record light alongside it, since the fifth-dimension version requires that they do not.
  • Any reanalysis by KM3NeT of the February 2023 event's energy or direction, since every model in play is fitted to that one reconstruction.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories