Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
A 21% Year and $11 Million: The Women CEO ETF's Problem Is Not Performance
Hypatia's WCEO beat the S&P 500 by more than seven points this year and now has a three-year record. It still trails its own small-cap benchmark, and it still cannot get on the platforms.
The Investor · Invest desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened
- The Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) was up 21% year to date as of market close Friday, compared with under 14% for the S&P 500.
- The fund recently reached two milestones: it cleared $10 million in assets and now has a three-year track record.
- The actively managed fund represents about $11 million.
- The fund's methodology is to invest in big public companies led by women, and it is actively managed.
- WCEO appears to be the only US ETF with a focus on women-led companies.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
The Hypatia Women CEO ETF closed Friday up 21% year to date against under 14% for the S&P 500, a lead of more than seven percentage points [1][1]. It has also cleared $10 million in assets and a three-year track record, and managing partner Patricia Lizarraga says independent advisors are now taking an interest in what she describes as the only financial product in the world targeting the performance of female CEOs [2][6].
The fund is actively managed and buys large public companies run by women [4], and it appears to be the only US ETF with that focus [5]. Hypatia's stated thesis is a selection effect rather than a values screen: because it is harder for women to reach the top, the ones who get there have been filtered for resilience, and boards have a fiduciary duty to pick the best candidate [7].
Test that against the right benchmark. WCEO's benchmark is not the S&P 500 but the S&P SmallCap 600, which returned 23% this year, leaving the fund about two points behind its own yardstick [8][2]. The holdings explain why the two comparisons diverge. Top positions include several oil and gas companies and International Seaways, with significant allocations to Franklin Resources, Voya Financial and other asset managers and insurers [9]. Lizarraga calls that diversification away from the Magnificent 7 and credits it for the performance [10]. It is also a plausible description of a small-cap, energy-and-financials book in a year when that mix worked. Software exposure hurt the fund in the second quarter, she said, because women-led tech companies more often sit on the software side than the hardware side, and she says that has since reversed [11].
The flows question gets an unkind answer from the peer group. State Street's SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF holds $337 million and returned 22% this year, essentially matching WCEO with roughly 30 times the assets [12][3]. The Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF has $59 million and returned 10% [13]. The Impax Global Women's Leadership Fund, a mutual fund, has $659 million and is up 15% [14]. Across those four products, WCEO holds about 1% of the assets while sitting near the top of the returns [4]. Returns are not what is allocating the money here.
Distribution is the binding constraint, and Lizarraga says so: the fund is not even available through Ellevest, a platform built for women investors [15]. Her plan is that three years of numbers gets more advisors and RIAs to run the due diligence [16].
Watch the asset line rather than the performance line. An $11 million fund [3] converts advisor interest into flows only through platform additions, and none have been announced. Watch what happens the first year small caps and energy lag, because a management-quality effect [7] should survive an unfavourable factor tilt and a size-and-sector accident will not. And watch whether SHE's $337 million [12] keeps growing while the purer version of the thesis stays under $15 million.