Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

Video surveys off Scilly recorded more than 90 seabed species at ten sites outside MPAs

A Plymouth-led team says the sediment mosaics it filmed are not fully described by the EUNIS habitat classes that guide UK marine management, on ground left free of bottom-towed gear for more than ten years.

The Scientist · Science desk

Photograph accompanying Video surveys off Scilly recorded more than 90 seabed species at ten sites outside MPAs
Photo: hellorayo.co.uk

What happened

  • A University of Plymouth-led team, working with local fishers and conservation managers, ran towed and baited video surveys at ten locations outside existing marine protected areas around the Isles of Scilly.
  • The surveys turned up a mosaic of sediment habitats that included sandy bedforms as well as boulders and cobbles lying over sand, at depths of up to 90 metres.
  • Those habitats supported more than 90 species of seabed animals, including corals, sponges, worms, sharks, rays and starfish.
  • Further analysis showed the diversity of sediment habitats is not fully captured by the habitat classifications within the European Nature Information System.
  • The team concludes that UK sediment habitat classifications may rest on shifted baselines, describing seabed as it looks after decades of human activity instead of at its best.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Sensitivity follows the assigned class, and the animals in frame do not change it, so a class that under-describes a patch of seabed limits the protection a manager can argue for at that spot.
  • cost The ecological baselines the authors want come from repeat survey work they themselves call costly and time-consuming, and that spending falls on regulators and monitoring programmes.
  • decision Anyone setting condition targets for UK sediment habitats now has a candidate reference point: seabed rested from trawling and dredging for more than ten years. Adopting it raises the bar.
  • precedent If the shifted-baseline reading is accepted for Scilly, any UK sediment class described from already-worked ground is open to the same challenge.

UK marine management works in EUNIS classes. A patch of seabed is assigned to one, and the description and sensitivity attached to that class inform decisions about what human activities are permitted there [7]. The Plymouth-led team's finding is that the ground it filmed does not fit cleanly: the mosaic of sandy bedforms and of boulders and cobbles over sand is not fully captured by the marine EUNIS classifications [2][5]. Upright animals such as sponges can shelter other species and increase the sensitivity of a habitat, and the same sediments can act as nursery and feeding areas for species of commercial and conservation importance [4].

Ten locations were surveyed, all outside existing marine protected areas, using towed and baited video at depths reaching 90 metres [1][2]. More than 90 seabed animal species were recorded across those ten sites, which works out to at least nine per site [3][15]. The published account reports a species list, not densities.

The shifted-baselines argument rests on the history of the ground. "Many of the sediment habitats around the Isles of Scilly have not been trawled or dredged for over a decade. So, it provides a really good example of what a recovering seabed can look like," said Rebecca Turley, a PhD researcher and the paper's first author [12]. Turley also said that "where shifting baselines affect habitat classifications, they will need updating to ensure that marine habitats are appropriately protected in the future" [13].

What that supports is a mismatch between one recovering archipelago and the classes written for UK sediments [5][6]. It does not measure how far off those classes are anywhere else. The comparison here sets recovering ground against a classification scheme, not against trawled ground filmed with the same cameras. Whether the gap holds on seabed still worked by bottom-towed gear is untested.

The team's three recommendations are a review of classifications and sensitivity assessments, with MPA integrity and effectiveness at risk if it is not done [9]; monitoring to determine ecological baselines and recovery [10]; and management of each MPA on the habitats and species found throughout the site instead of on individual habitat features [11]. "The new understanding of sediment habitats confirms that current marine management policies, such as EUNIS classifications, reflect shifted baselines," said Emma Sheehan, professor of marine ecology [14]. The work is published in the Journal of Applied Ecology [8].

What to watch

  • Whether UK conservation agencies open a review of the EUNIS sediment classes or of the sensitivity assessments attached to them.
  • Whether anyone repeats the towed and baited video protocol on ground still worked by bottom-towed gear. A repeat there would turn the shifted-baseline inference into a measured contrast.
  • Whether any of the ten surveyed locations, all currently outside MPA boundaries, are proposed for spatial protection.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories