Science1 publisher2 min readPublished
Leipzig and Prague physicists switch a microswimmer's propulsion mode with patterned laser light
Heating a gold-coated sphere with tailored light patterns makes the same particle push like a bacterium or pull like an alga. Because the laser can only add heat, the slowest style turned out to be the most efficient.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- Physicists at Leipzig University and Charles University in Prague report a way to switch one artificial microswimmer between bacteria-like and algae-like propulsion in real time.
- The two styles are physically distinct: E. coli pushes with flagella at its rear, algae such as Chlamydomonas pull with flagella at the front, and the two produce entirely different flow fields.
- The particles are transparent spheres a few micrometers across, coated with gold particles that act as individually controllable heat sources under laser illumination.
- The temperature pattern written onto the sphere both propels it and sets the flow field around it, so changing the light pattern turns the same particle from a pusher into a puller.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- capability Collective active-matter questions that needed populations of differently built particles can now be posed with one batch of identical spheres, reassigned during the run.
- constraint If the reachable optimum depends on the actuation available, a theoretically optimal swimmer is a target that no particular mechanism is obliged to hit, and optimality has to be recalculated for each mechanism.
- decision Propulsion mode becomes a setting to vary within an experiment, so a fabrication run no longer has to commit in advance to pusher or puller.
- precedent Rohde's evolutionary explanation is a claim about real bacteria. The constraint behind it was measured on gold-coated spheres.
The laser can heat the sphere's surface but cannot cool it, and the researchers describe that limit as crucial [9]. Only patterns that add heat somewhere on the surface are available [9]. To keep such a pattern registered on a particle that is moving, the group projects tailored intensity patterns onto the surface and adjusts them in real time to the particle's motion [10].
"Our work helps us understand what an 'optimal' swimmer actually means in reality. We show that the physical constraints of the swimming mechanism can prevent a swimmer from achieving the theoretical optimum," said Lisa Rohde, the study's first author [12].
Speed and efficiency came apart. "The counterintuitive finding is that, at the same laser power, the slowest swimming style is actually the most efficient when it comes to achieving a particular speed," Rohde said [13]. The comparison holds laser power fixed [13], so it accounts for light arriving at the particle and not for the projection optics and tracking loop that keep a pattern on a moving micrometer-scale sphere [10]. The announcement does not report swimming speeds, laser powers or how many particles were run [19].
Frank Cichos, who leads Leipzig's Molecular Nanophotonics Group, said: "Until now, a microswimmer's hydrodynamic character was fixed at the point of production, much like an animal's body structure. We can now use light to change it in real time and, for example, adapt it to the environment if needed" [14]. According to the group, experiments on the collective behaviour of active matter, including bacterial turbulence and swarming, have been virtually impossible with conventional swimmers whose properties are fixed [16].
The object being steered is a heated sphere. Rohde said the same constraints exist in nature, and that this may explain why evolution has produced bacterial swimming strategies that are not optimal on paper yet are extremely successful and widespread [15]. Whether that holds for E. coli, which pushes itself along with flagella at its rear [7], would take a measurement on bacteria.
Synthetic particles of this kind are used as physical models for the interactions between biological microorganisms [6], and the researchers say the work opens an evolutionary approach to developing synthetic active matter [18]. Rohde said the group next wants to combine the programmable control with machine learning, so that a microswimmer can learn which style suits a given task, and to compare swimming in viscoelastic mucus with swimming in water [17].
What to watch
- Whether an independent lab, with different projection and tracking optics, reproduces the ordering in which the slowest style is the most efficient.
- Whether a population of these spheres under separate per-particle control reproduces the collective phenomena, such as bacterial turbulence, that fixed swimmers could not test.
- Whether an actuation that can cool as well as heat changes which propulsion mode is optimal. That would test the constraint argument directly.