Leadership1 publisher3 min readPublished
Meta's Muse turnaround ran on tens of thousands of employee testers under Nat Friedman
Meta had tens of thousands of employees test Muse for months under outside hire Nat Friedman before the agent topped the App Store. Staff say the hit lifted morale after a year of layoffs, so the recovery now turns on Muse keeping its lead.
The Board Room · Leadership desk
What happened
- Muse, Meta's new personal AI assistant, climbed to the top of the App Store and was the focus of Meta's Connect conference this week.
- Former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, who runs the superintelligence unit's Products and Applied Research team, has worked on Muse since September 2025, when it was codenamed Hatch.
- Tens of thousands of Meta employees tested Muse for months, and the use cases they came up with became key to the effort.
- Meta also bought agent talent through acqui-hires, including the leaders of the AI agent startup Dreamer.
- Employees said Muse's success, along with a Meta share gain of more than 20% since launch, has lifted morale after a year of layoffs and surveillance.
Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- exposure Staff sentiment after a year of layoffs is now tied to an App Store ranking and a share price, so an OpenAI rival would test employee morale along with the product.
- cost Meta now depends on a product leader whose pace comes from bypassing internal tools and teams, and those teams still have to work with him once the launch is over.
- capability Months of employee testing gave Meta a working method for improving an agent on real tasks, and it can apply that method to the next agent product.
- exposure Because Muse needs broad access to users' accounts, any security lapse would reach those accounts directly, putting more weight on how Meta handles security criticism.
The board-deck version of Muse credits an outside leader and a company-wide test program, and it leaves out how late the product came good. Two weeks before launch, the chatbot still struggled to speak good English, according to a person directly familiar with the matter, and passing coherence tests came as a huge relief [11]. Earlier this year, some of Meta's top AI employees tried it and found it working poorly, one employee told Business Insider. To that person, it felt like another chatbot with a worse underlying model and extra steps [12].
The recovery came from Meta's own staff. Their testing produced the data Friedman's team used to improve tasks such as booking meetings and cancelling plane tickets, the incremental work Silicon Valley calls hill-climbing [14]. "Our researchers did a ton of work teaching agents how to choose the right tool for a job," Wang said at Connect [15]. Business Insider does not say whether the thousands of employees pulled onto the effort were reassigned or tested alongside their own work, or what Meta paid for the Dreamer team [3][4].
The trade-off in putting Muse under one outside leader is speed against friction with the rest of Meta. Zuckerberg brought Friedman in last year as part of a deal to buy a stake in his venture fund, NFDG, and Friedman and Wang cowrote a memo describing a "superintelligent personal sidekick" [16][17]. His website says "slow is fake," and he has pushed Meta's AI staff off slow internal tools toward external ones such as Vercel [20]. When OpenClaw took off this winter, he wrote a two-page memo titled "The Claw Is The Law" and bought hundreds of Mac Minis [21]. He also chafes with other teams across the company, one employee said [18]. Meta's communications chief, Andy Stone, recently called him "Nat the Truthteller" after Friedman said a report about Muse's security was written by "dummies" [19].
The morale gain is the part of this quarter's result most exposed next quarter. The lift employees describe follows a year of mass layoffs and employee surveillance, and it is attached to a chart position and a share price [7][8]. Both are under pressure. Instinct is thriving, OpenAI is widely expected to launch a rival, and privacy concerns have followed Muse's need for broad access to users' accounts [5][6].
Business Insider puts the skeptic's case plainly: whether Meta can sustain Muse's momentum is another question [22]. I think the answer depends on which part of the turnaround a leader counts on. The testing program and the task improvements it produced are process Meta now has in-house [13][14]. The morale gain is tied more closely to the ranking [8]. "Muse is busy working for millions of people because of the hard work of a bunch of people at Meta," a Meta spokesperson said, adding, "we're still cooking" [9].
What to watch
- Whether OpenAI launches its expected rival agent, and where Muse ranks on the App Store afterward.
- Further reporting on Muse's security and account access, the subject of the report Friedman dismissed.
- Any reorganisation or departures traced to the friction between Friedman's team and other Meta groups.