Build1 publisher2 min readPublished
The $0.00799 fine-tuning rate in your Bedrock budget belongs to Llama 2
Bedrock bills for Llama 3.3 70B customisation while publishing no price for it, and the number circulating in third-party guides is a Llama 2 70B rate. A 33-region API sweep found one region that can run the job.
The Engineer · Build desk

What happened
- Amazon's Bedrock customization pricing page, read on 8 September 2026, lists Llama 2 as the only Meta model with a published training price, and the Llama 3.3 70B teams fine-tune today is absent.
- Third-party guides quoting $0.00799 per 1,000 tokens as the Llama 3.3 70B training rate are restating the Llama 2 70B figure and applying it to a different model, according to that author.
- A boto3 probe of all 33 regions the SDK lists, filtered to fine-tunable models only, found exactly one region able to customise Llama 3.3 70B: us-west-2.
- In us-east-1 every one of the six fine-tunable models is an Amazon model, five Nova variants plus a Titan image embedder, with no Meta or Anthropic option.
Compiled by The EngineerSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- cost The only defensible rate for a Llama 3.3 70B customisation job comes off an invoice, so whoever needs the number pays for it by running the job first and reading the bill after.
- constraint A UK or EU residency requirement and a Llama 3.3 70B fine-tune do not currently coexist on Bedrock, because the training step has to happen in us-west-2 regardless of where the data is supposed to sit.
- decision Teams that default to us-east-1 now pick between staying on Amazon's own model family and moving the training workload to a second region with its own IAM, data-copy and inference plumbing.
- exposure Any forecast, contract or internal chargeback built on the circulated per-token figure carries an error of unknown size, and there is no published number against which to size it.
The filter is the whole experiment. `list_foundation_models(byCustomizationType="FINE_TUNING")` returns only the models an account can train in that region; drop the filter and you get the invoke catalogue, which is much longer and answers a different question [12]. That is also why the console agrees with the sweep. The us-east-1 fine-tuning picker on 8 September 2026 offered one provider, Amazon, and the same six models the API returned [11][9]. The gap is in the pricing page, not in the catalogue.
Thirteen of the 33 regions never gave an answer at all. They returned `UnrecognizedClientException`, which is what an opt-in region returns to an account that has never enabled it, so their zero is not evidence of absence [13]. That leaves 20 real answers [7]. Two of those 20 came back non-zero [15] and the write-up counts seventeen zeros [16], which leaves one region unaccounted for in the tally [14]. It does not move the conclusion: one of the 20 answering regions can train Llama 3.3 70B, or 5% of them [19].
Now the number people are budgeting from. For $0.00799 per 1,000 tokens to be the Llama 3.3 70B training rate, AWS would have to charge for a Llama 3.3 job exactly what it charges for a Llama 2 70B job, and the customization page does not say that; it lists Llama 2 and stops [4][1]. The table is not even consistent in units, since two models on it are priced by the hour [2]. Meanwhile the capability exists and produces a line item: the author reports a fine-tuned Llama 3.3 70B in production on Bedrock and a training charge on the bill, with no published price to check it against [3].
What the evidence does not establish is the actual rate, or how far $0.00799 sits from it. It could be identical, and nothing published settles that either way, which leaves the invoice from your own first job as the only number you can defend [5].
On durability, two runs five weeks apart returned the same table [17]. That is a narrow window to generalise from, and the author says so, though the probe reproduces in about a minute [18]. The planning consequence is narrow too. A Llama 3.3 70B fine-tune is a us-west-2 job, alongside Claude 3 Haiku and the Llama 3.1 pair [8], London offers exactly one tunable model and it is not a Llama [10], and the first training job you run is the price list [5].
What to watch
- AWS adding a Llama 3.3 70B row to the Bedrock customization pricing page would settle whether $0.00799 transfers.
- A sweep from an account with the 13 opt-in regions enabled could confirm or clear them.
- Any Meta or Anthropic model appearing in the us-east-1 fine-tuning picker changes the region-planning answer.