Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

Nitrogen fixation in the tropical Atlantic weakened during the warm late Pliocene, fossil shells show

A Max Planck-led group read nitrogen isotopes in foraminifera from tropical North Atlantic drill cores and found less fixation in a warmer ocean, with the Pacific's nitrogen sink shrinking alongside it.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying Nitrogen fixation in the tropical Atlantic weakened during the warm late Pliocene, fossil shells show

What happened

  • A Max Planck Institute for Chemistry-led group reports in Nature Communications that nitrogen fixation in the tropical Atlantic was significantly reduced during the warm late Pliocene and rose into the cooler Pleistocene.
  • The evidence comes from nitrogen isotopes measured in fossil foraminifera shells recovered from sediment drill cores in the tropical North Atlantic, spanning the Pliocene and early Pleistocene.
  • Because source and sink shrank together, the authors read the total amount of nitrogen in the ocean as staying relatively stable through that warm interval.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Warm, nutrient-poor surface water is where cyanobacteria fix nitrogen, so more of it looks like more fixation. One basin's Pliocene record points the other way.
  • capability Foraminiferal nitrogen isotopes give researchers a handle on the fixation side of the cycle, which the institute's earlier denitrification reconstructions had left unresolved.
  • exposure Even with the total nitrogen inventory stable, regions fed by phosphorus carried in from elsewhere are the ones whose nutrient supply moves when the sink at the other end of the current slows.

The proxy is a trace of nitrogen locked into shells. Foraminifera take up small amounts of it as they grow their calcareous skeletons, and those skeletons survive in seafloor sediment, so a nitrogen signal can be read off animals that died millions of years ago [3]. Earlier work from the same institute had reconstructed the other half of the cycle, showing that water-column denitrification weakened globally in past warm climates and leaving the fixation side open [7].

That gap is where the phosphorus link matters. Denitrifying bacteria strip nitrate out of oxygen-poor water and leave the residue comparatively rich in phosphorus. Currents redistribute that surplus, and nitrogen fixers in nutrient-poor surface water draw on it, so a slower Pacific sink means less phosphorus arriving in the Atlantic [9]. The support offered for that chain is that the Atlantic fixation record and a recently published Pacific denitrification record both fall in the late Pliocene [8]. Two reconstructions declining across the same interval fit the phosphorus explanation, but on their own they do not separate it from other things that changed in the late Pliocene ocean.

Nitrogen fixers work mainly in warm, nutrient-poor surface water [4]. A warmer ocean has more of that water, and the expectation of more fixation follows easily. The tropical Atlantic record for the late Pliocene, an epoch globally warmer than today, goes the other way [1][13]. The phys.org account does not give the size of the decline, only its direction and timing [20].

This record does not resolve how quickly fixation responds, or what a nutrient-poor gyre does over a few decades. After large Northern Hemisphere ice sheets began to grow about 2.8 million years ago, Caribbean fixation rose and fell in step with the roughly 41,000-year cycle in Earth's axial tilt [15]. Half that cycle is about 20,500 years [18]. The pacing shows up roughly 220,000 years before the Pliocene ends [17], inside an epoch that ran about 2.75 million years [16].

Maayan Yehudai, a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and the study's first author [12], framed the projection in conditional terms. "In a warmer future, we suspect both processes will slow down, so the ocean would fix less nitrogen but would also lose less," said Yehudai, adding that "the amount of nutrients supplied to a given region may differ from today" [11].

What to watch

  • Whether the Nature Communications paper quantifies the size of the fixation change and its uncertainty, which the phys.org summary does not.
  • A fixation record from a second basin would test the phosphorus-transport explanation; the reported work covers the tropical Atlantic and Caribbean.
  • Whether the timing in the Pacific denitrification record and this Atlantic record hold up when both are placed on a common age model.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories