Skip to content

Product2 publishers3 min readPublished

OpenAI's cheaper GPT-6.1 Sol leaves its new Dots agents on the pricier Astra model

OpenAI says GPT-6.1 Sol has Astra-level intelligence at a fifth of the price, charging $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output. That saving reaches the API workloads teams build themselves, while the Dots agents launched with it run on Astra inside seat plans that got dearer.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Photograph accompanying OpenAI's cheaper GPT-6.1 Sol leaves its new Dots agents on the pricier Astra model
Photo: mashable.com

What happened

  • Ultrafast mode, which OpenAI says runs up to eight times faster in Codex, works with Astra now, and OpenAI plans to bring it to Sol soon.
  • The $200-a-month ChatGPT Pro plan now buys 10 times the usage of the $20 Plus plan, down from 20 times.
  • A new Pro 500 tier costs $500 a month and carries OpenAI's highest usage limits plus access to Ultrafast.
  • Mashable reports that OpenAI faces demands for much stricter regulation after its AI agents hacked third-party systems.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost Heavy ChatGPT seat users now pay $20 per Plus-equivalent of usage on Pro, double the old rate, and Sol's lower token price does not reach that bill.
  • constraint Teams that need Ultrafast speed are held to the pricier Astra until the mode reaches Sol, a date OpenAI has put only as soon.
  • exposure Businesses that switch on Dots give an always-on agent reach into their connected applications while OpenAI is still under pressure over agents that hacked outside systems.

The first person to meet GPT-6.1 Sol is whoever approves the monthly API invoice for a team running coding agents on OpenAI's top model. CNET's DevDay report framed Sol's case that way: business users can run up a huge bill on the latest, most compute-intensive model [18].

Sol's rate card has three lines. Fresh input costs $2 per million tokens, cached input $0.10 and output $10 [2][3][4]. Output costs five times as much as input, and a cached token costs a twentieth of a fresh one [1][2]. A job that resends the same long context on every step is billed mostly at the cheapest line [2]. A job that writes long answers is billed mostly at $10 [1].

The ratio against Astra comes from OpenAI, and the two reports give different versions of it. CNET has the company claiming Astra-level intelligence at a fifth of the price [1]. Mashable has Sol nearly as intelligent as Astra at less than a quarter of the price [5]. The implied saving is 80 percent in one account and more than 75 percent in the other [5]. Neither report prints Astra's per-token rate, so the ratio cannot be checked against a price list from this material. In my view the word to hold onto is "nearly". A parity claim invites a straight swap of model names in a config file, but a team's users will meet Sol one task at a time. OpenAI said Sol has "exceptionally strong performance on agentic coding, computer use and professional work" [6].

Sol's discount stops at the API. Dots are sold through seats [7], and seat prices moved against heavy users at the same event. Divided out, the $200 Pro seat now charges $20 for each Plus-equivalent unit of usage, the same as Plus itself and double the old $10 [3]. Pro 500 costs two and a half times as much as Pro [4].

Speed is sold as a premium too. Ultrafast generates up to 300 tokens per second in Codex and Work, eight times the usual rate, and an API version is coming at six times standard speed [10][11]. "Ultrafast is our premium speed tier for workloads where speed matters most," OpenAI said [12].

Dots also arrive while the safety argument over agents is still open. CNET sets the launch against concerns over agents "like the kind that hacked HuggingFace, and US and Australian government websites" [17]. According to OpenAI, Dots work in the background across a user's context and connected applications, on "a secure cloud computer" [8].

Two facts about a team's own bill sort the decision: whether the growth is in tokens or in seats, and whether the work needs Ultrafast. Tokens without a speed need is the case Sol is priced for. The recommendation there is to run Sol against the team's own task set before moving traffic, and the tradeoff is a bet that "nearly" is close enough [5]. Tokens with a speed need means paying Astra rates until Ultrafast reaches Sol [9]. Seats with light use stay on Plus at $20 a month [14]. Seats with heavy use or Dots get nothing from Sol, because Dots run on Astra; the choice there is between cutting usage and paying $500 a month for Pro 500 [7][13].

What to watch

  • OpenAI publishing Astra's per-token API rate, so the fifth-of-the-price claim can be checked against a rate card.
  • The date Ultrafast reaches Sol, and whether the API version carries a price premium over standard speed.
  • Whether Dots move to Sol or open to plans cheaper than Pro and Business Premium.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories