Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

Rice's electrical pulses recover nine tenths of PFAS fluorine as silver fluoride

James Tour's lab at Rice pulses electricity through PFAS-loaded carbon and catches the freed fluorine on silver, producing the same fluorinating reagent chemists already buy. The tests were lab scale.

The Scientist · Science desk

Photograph accompanying Rice's electrical pulses recover nine tenths of PFAS fluorine as silver fluoride
Photo: rice.edu

What happened

  • James Tour's lab at Rice University has published a process in Nature Chemical Engineering that captures fluoride from fluorinated waste, including the kind in firefighting foam, and converts it into silver fluoride.
  • The method mixes silver nitrate with activated carbon that has adsorbed PFAS, then applies short electrical pulses that heat the material to several hundred degrees Celsius so nearby silver can catch the freed fluorine.
  • Rice reports that the process removes more than 99.9 percent of the fluoride available in the PFAS and collects 90 percent of that removed fluoride as silver fluoride.
  • The silver fluoride made in the lab was equivalent to the commercial reagent used to make compounds including pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • capability The group's earlier route locked the fluoride into calcium fluoride that had no downstream use, so this is the first version of the chemistry whose product a chemical buyer would want.
  • constraint Any larger reactor has to keep hot carbon and silver physically apart while fluorine moves between them as a gas. Gas transport across a separator is the engineering limit on scale.
  • cost Each batch ties up a silver inventory, so the running cost of the process turns on how many times the recovered silver can go back through it.
  • decision An operator choosing a PFAS treatment route cannot yet compare this against incineration or landfill on price. A pilot would produce those numbers, and there has not been one.

The two reported percentages multiply out to about 90 percent: 0.999 times 0.90 is 0.899, so roughly nine parts in ten of the fluorine in the treated waste comes off as a usable reagent [8]. About one part in ten of what is removed goes somewhere other than the product [20].

The pulsed step starts with activated carbon that has already taken up the PFAS, mixed with silver nitrate [4]. In the group's earlier work that carbon came from adsorbing PFAS out of water, and flashing it made graphene while the fluoride ended up as calcium fluoride, the nontoxic mineral form, which nobody could then use [11]. Getting PFAS out of dilute water happens before any of this. A site still has to push the same volume through carbon.

The design problem was the heat source itself. "The biggest challenge was that the hot carbon needed to release fluorine also creates a reducing environment that can convert newly formed silver fluoride back to metallic silver," said Bowen Li, a co-first author and former Tour lab postdoctoral fellow, now a professor at Soochow University [5][14]. "We solved this by physically separating the carbon and silver with a porous quartz-fiber barrier. Fluorine-containing gaseous species can pass through the barrier, while the solid carbon and silver remain separated," Li said [6].

A bigger reactor has to reproduce that arrangement: hot solids held apart, fluorine crossing between them as a gas.

The silver is the part an operator has to buy. Rice reports that once the silver fluoride has handed its fluoride to an organic substrate, the silver can be collected and run through the process again [10]. Rice does not report cost, energy use, throughput, or where the uncollected fluoride ends up [17]. How many cycles the silver survives would decide whether the inventory is a one-time capital charge or a recurring loss. A pilot would have to measure that.

So the claim the evidence supports is a chemical one, made on lab-scale material [19]. "We saw this as an opportunity to turn this from a waste-destruction problem into a resource-utilization problem," said Yi Chen, a former Rice Academy Fellow and co-first author who is now an assistant professor at Fudan University [12]. Tour, the corresponding author, described the output in similar terms: "This takes PFAS waste treatment from a process focused on neutralizing and removing waste into circular materials chemistry" [13][16].

What to watch

  • Whether the Nature Chemical Engineering paper reports how many times recovered silver can be cycled before it degrades.
  • A test on real firefighting foam concentrate rather than lab-loaded activated carbon.
  • Any pilot with a water utility or waste contractor. That would be the first source of throughput and cost figures.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories