Skip to content

Science1 publisher2 min readPublished

Case report attributes a man's fainting and refractory shock to a hair dye applied two days earlier

A 61-year-old in India fainted twice and stayed hypotensive through IV fluids while his brain imaging and cardiac tests came back negative. His doctors got their answer by asking what he had done two days before.

The Scientist · Science desk

Illustration accompanying Case report attributes a man's fainting and refractory shock to a hair dye applied two days earlier

What happened

  • A 61-year-old man in India reached an emergency department after two fainting episodes, one of about three minutes and a second of about two, with nausea beforehand and swelling around one eye.
  • Because he had fainted twice and had heart disease, doctors looked first at brain and heart: the MRI and EEG showed no cause, and intensive care tests for infection and heart attack were negative too.
  • The swelling spread from one eye to both and then across his face while his blood pressure kept falling despite intravenous fluids.
  • Deeper history-taking turned up an artificial hair dye applied two days before he fell ill, followed by itching on his scalp, neck and face that he treated himself with cetirizine for two days.
  • Diagnosed with anaphylaxis and given antihistamines, steroids and fluids, he still needed an intravenous epinephrine drip for about 16 hours before his blood pressure held.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision In a hypotensive patient with spreading facial swelling and a clean neuro and cardiac workup, the next move the authors recommend is a question about products used in the past few days. That question costs a minute of history-taking.
  • cost A cosmetic exposure consumed intensive care and at least eight days of inpatient time; the case report does not include costs.
  • constraint The authors state that whole-body reactions to hair dye are uncommon, and one patient does not supply a rate to weigh against an imaging-first reflex.
  • exposure He leaves the hospital sensitized and warned that a similar reaction can happen again. Whether there is a next episode now depends on his identifying and avoiding the product, with a dermatologist to sort out which one.

The report's own title hedges. Kuraning and colleagues published it as "Cosmetic catastrophe: A case report of delayed anaphylactic shock likely following hair dye exposure" [24]. The doctors did not identify which ingredient triggered the reaction [22]. Para-phenylenediamine enters the account through earlier research the authors cite, in which ultraviolet light enhances that compound's allergy-triggering effects; they raise it because the man spent two to three hours outdoors in the sun each day after dyeing his hair [21][12].

The diagnosis rested on a sequence: recent dye use, the itching that followed, rapidly worsening facial swelling, and blood pressure that would not come up [13]. His doctors read the early scalp itching as a mild reaction that later progressed, and offer a biphasic pattern, seen in about 5% of anaphylaxis patients, as one possible explanation; they say it remains only a possibility [20]. That 5% is drawn from anaphylaxis in general.

What the episode cost in time is easier to pin down. The epinephrine drip ran about 16 hours before his pressure held [15]. Three days of treatment brought the blood pressure up and the facial swelling down [16]. Five further days followed in a general ward before discharge [17]. That puts the stay after diagnosis at least eight days as an inpatient, beginning in intensive care [25][7].

The conclusion the team drew is procedural: ask about recent use of products such as hair dye when fainting, facial swelling or shock has no other explanation [23]. The base rate argues against expecting it. Most allergic reactions to hair dye stay where the dye touched the skin, as itching, redness and swelling, and reactions involving the whole body are uncommon, the man's doctors wrote [19].

What to watch

  • Whether the full Kuraning et al. report or the dermatology follow-up includes patch or specific IgE testing that names the sensitizer.
  • Whether any case series or registry puts a rate on systemic reactions to hair dye. One patient cannot supply that number.
  • Whether the ultraviolet-plus-para-phenylenediamine interaction the authors cite is tested prospectively.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories