Skip to content

Security1 publisher3 min readPublished

A New Jersey judge orders radaris.com and a dozen sibling domains handed to the plaintiffs

Atlas Data Privacy Corp sued the people-search broker Radaris under Daniel's Law, filed twice, and now holds an order transferring radaris.com and more than a dozen related domains to it.

The Watch · Security desk

Illustration accompanying A New Jersey judge orders radaris.com and a dozen sibling domains handed to the plaintiffs

What happened

  • A New Jersey judge ordered radaris.com and more than a dozen other data broker domains transferred to the plaintiffs in a Daniel's Law suit against the people-search operator.
  • Atlas Data Privacy Corp first sued Radaris in February 2024, alleging the broker published personal information on New Jersey law enforcement officials in violation of the state statute.
  • Atlas refiled in June 2025 with a much larger set of Radaris-family data brokers named as defendants.
  • Radaris attorney Val Gurvits of the Boston Law Group admitted his clients had invented the CEO pseudonym "Gary Norden".
  • Radaris had long ignored requests to remove personal information from its network of people-search sites, according to KrebsOnSecurity.

Compiled by The WatchSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • capability Handing over the domains gives the plaintiffs the asset that produces the traffic, so enforcement stops depending on finding a Radaris entity or bank account that can be made to pay.
  • decision Lawyers bringing these suits now have to decide whether to name every registrant of record at the outset, because the unnamed Cyprus owner is what defeated this same remedy in 2017.
  • precedent A statute that fines $1,000 per ignored removal request has produced a loss of infrastructure, so a broker weighing delay against compliance now risks losing its domains.

Collecting money from Radaris is the part that has never worked. Matt Adkisson, president and CEO of Atlas Data Privacy Corp, told KrebsOnSecurity that the entity carrying the liability kept changing. "We refer to this period as their island-hopping phase. Privacy policies changed constantly, and new entities kept appearing from places like the Marshall Islands, the British Virgin Islands, and Seychelles," Adkisson said [13]. "Behind the scenes, it felt like a shell game. Defense lawyers told the court that certain entities merely operated the domains and were the proper parties to sue. But by the time a judgment neared, those entities would be discarded and new entities would appear," he said [14].

When the Radaris terms of service were updated to say the company was managed from the Marshall Islands, Atlas hired an investigator there [21]. Adkisson said the brand new entity named as the manager did not exist yet [15].

A domain sits in a registry, and a court can order the registry to move it. Radaris has been through that once already. Plaintiffs in a 2017 class action the company never contested could not collect a $7.5 million default judgment, and the court ordered Verisign to transfer radaris.com to them [16]. Val Gurvits appealed, arguing the suit had not named the domain's actual owner, a Cyprus company called Bitseller Expert Limited, and that taking the name would violate its due process rights [17]. The judge ruled for Radaris and halted the transfer [18].

The new order faces the same argument. Radaris's attorneys waited until the last minute to appear and contest what was headed for a default judgment, then told the court that Atlas had failed to serve the real owners and operators [11]. Sixteen months separate Atlas's original February 2024 complaint from its June 2025 refiling [19]. KrebsOnSecurity did not report the date of the transfer order or the size of the judgment behind it [22].

Radaris's lawyers also threatened to sue KrebsOnSecurity for defamation over its reporting on the co-founders unless the story was removed and an apology issued, asserting the reporting was wildly inaccurate and that the true owners were Ukrainians living in Ukraine [8]. The reporting identified Igor and Dmitry Lubarsky, Russian-born brothers living in Massachusetts who run an array of people-search companies along with Russian-language dating services and affiliate programs [7]. Radaris issued multiple press releases over the years quoting its invented CEO while seeking money from potential investors [10].

The statute is narrow. Daniel's Law lets New Jersey law enforcement officials, government personnel, judges and their families have their information removed from commercial data brokers and people-search services, and sets fines of $1,000 per violation against companies that ignore removal requests [5].

What to watch

  • Whether an unnamed registrant of record, as Bitseller Expert Limited was in 2017, files a due process challenge to the new transfer order.
  • Whether Verisign and the other registries actually execute the transfers, and how quickly the same records reappear on new domains.
  • Whether the court publishes a per-violation total for the Daniel's Law claims against the expanded list of Radaris-family brokers.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories