Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

Coupang will take K-beauty counterfeit reports on weekends, holidays and at night

Coupang is piloting an off-hours counterfeit line for cosmetics brands and wants brand-held product data inside its detection system. Blocked listings of fake Korean cosmetics overseas hit 36,116 last year.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Coupang will take K-beauty counterfeit reports on weekends, holidays and at night
Photo: en.sedaily.com

What happened

  • Coupang is piloting a dedicated hotline for cosmetics brands and says it will accept counterfeit reports on weekends, holidays and late at night so that it can act more quickly.
  • The company said on the 13th that it had held a Brand Protection Seminar with the Korea Cosmetic Association three days earlier on counterfeit handling and intellectual property cooperation.
  • Coupang described a three-stage process: screening malicious sellers at signup, detecting with artificial intelligence and monitoring, and halting sales once a report is confirmed.
  • Sellers confirmed to have sold counterfeit goods are removed from the platform under a one-strike-out policy.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost Coupang pays for the intake window, and the cosmetics brands pay for the staff who have to be awake to use it, because a report filed at midnight needs a brand employee working at midnight.
  • capability One-strike removal combined with off-hours intake means a confirmed counterfeit seller can be cut on a public holiday instead of the enforcement clock starting on the next business day.
  • decision A brand deciding whether to feed Coupang its product identification codes and distribution characteristics is deciding whether to give a marketplace a picture of its authorized distributor network.

The Korean Intellectual Property Office put last year's count of blocked listings of counterfeit Korean-brand cosmetics on overseas platforms at 36,116 [3]. Spread across the year that is about 99 a day, one every fifteen minutes [12]. Postings do not arrive on a schedule, and a fake listed on a Saturday sells for two days before a Monday morning report reaches anybody. Coupang's pilot accepts reports on weekends, holidays and late at night [1].

The two-year path is 16,774 to 36,116, an increase of 19,342 listings and a compound rate near 47 percent a year [3][10][11]. The series counts blocks, and blocks go up when rights holders and platforms look harder as well as when sellers post more. KIPO's figure covers overseas online platforms, and the article does not say what share of those listings sat on Coupang. It also does not say how many reports Coupang received or how quickly it acted [13].

Coupang said it plans to expand cooperation so that product identification data and distribution characteristics held by brands can be factored into its detection process [6]. Detection fed a brand's own packaging codes and authorized distributor patterns can reach listings nobody has reported, while a phone line only covers the listings a brand has already found. Coupang also said it would fold the seminar feedback into its operating procedures and hold such seminars regularly [7].

"Protecting intellectual property is an area that requires continuous communication and cooperation with brands," said Nina Ramesh, who heads Coupang's IP legal division [8]. She said the company would "steadily improve our response system in ways that brands can actually feel" [9].

I'd expect the data sharing to matter more than the opening hours, and the counter-thesis is straightforward: this is relationship work with the Korea Cosmetic Association's members [2], because the brands that already run overseas monitoring were filing reports anyway and the ones that do not will not start because someone answers on a holiday. The first view fails if the blocked-listing series is mostly measuring more monitoring effort, in which case the doubling says little about how much counterfeit K-beauty is on sale [3]. It fails too if no brand hands over its identification data, leaving the pilot as an intake window with the same detection sitting behind it [6].

What to watch

  • Whether Coupang publishes report volumes or response times from the pilot.
  • Whether any named K-beauty brand agrees to supply product identification data and distribution details, and on what terms.
  • Whether the off-hours intake extends past cosmetics into other Coupang categories or to its overseas storefronts.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories