Science1 publisher2 min readPublished
Catterick's garrison schools pool SEND expertise for pupils who arrive mid-year
The largest British Army garrison has schools that share specialist training and put their SEND coordinators in touch with one another. The evaluation of that project credits communication, adaptive teaching and trust.
The Scientist · Science desk
What happened
- Children of current or former armed forces personnel move around the UK or abroad when a parent is posted, and each move means a new school and new relationships with children and adults.
- Research cited in the article suggests that the more frequently children move schools, the lower their academic attainment may be.
- Service children often join their new school part way through the school year instead of at the start of a term.
- The schools serving Catterick Garrison, the largest British Army garrison, ran the Garrison Assist Project on funding from the Armed Forces Covenant Trust Fund to make SEND support more consistent.
- The evaluation by the author and Julie Wharton named three principles behind stronger SEND support: effective communication, high-quality teaching that responds to need, and relationships built on trust.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Curriculum sequencing differs between schools, so finding a new pupil's gaps in learning falls to the receiving teacher; the incoming paperwork flags none of them.
- decision A receiving authority has to choose between working to a plan it did not write and starting its own assessment, and a family may be posted again before the second route finishes.
- contradiction Consistency at Catterick rested on winning a grant, so whether a service child keeps continuous SEND support can turn on which schools secure project funding.
- capability Schools around a garrison can build this kind of shared expertise between themselves without waiting for national SEND reform to arrive.
Two hedges sit in the sentence that links moving to marks: research "suggests" it, and attainment "may be" lower [4]. The research gives a direction and no magnitude. To pin the size down you would need an effect size, and a design that varies the number of school moves while holding constant how long a serving parent has been away from home [1]. Service life often brings both at once. The author writes that periods of family separation during deployment or training can disrupt family relationships in the long term [2].
The administrative part is more concrete. An education, health and care plan issued by one local authority may not translate neatly into the SEND offer of the next [9]. Statutory assessments of need can run slowly enough that a family relocates again before the process finishes [10]. Meanwhile the school that has just taken the child in has to make immediate decisions about support inside what the author calls a complex and under-resourced SEND system [12].
When the serving parent is away, the non-serving parent generally takes primary responsibility for getting that support in place [7]. The Covenant says service families should experience no detriment compared with civilians as a result of their service [5]. For families whose children have SEND, the author writes, that aspiration "can feel far removed from their realities" [6], and parents in the research described the process of securing support as a "battle" [8].
The Catterick schools' answer was coordination. Under the Garrison Assist Project they shared specialist training, connected their special educational needs coordinators, ran a forum for parents and caregivers, and produced resources on families' experiences [15]. Staff found that talking to colleagues at their own and other schools helped them understand the challenges and share what worked [19]. The author cautioned that training "should not be regarded as a magic bullet", and that open communication with families remains critical [20].
The evaluation covers one garrison and reports participant accounts and the principles drawn from them [2]. Attainment was among the outcomes it left out [2]. Whether coordination narrows a gap is a question for another study. It also depends on a structure few schools have: several schools serving the same garrison, with a shared caseload big enough to justify a joint forum and joint training [3]. Catterick is the largest British Army garrison [14]. The author notes that the government has recognised the need to make SEND support more responsive, that systemic change takes time, and that for children, families and schools the challenges are happening now [21].
What to watch
- A study that compares service children's attainment by number of school moves with deployment separation held constant.
- Whether the SEND coordinator collaboration and the parent forum at Catterick continue once the Covenant Trust Fund grant ends.
- Whether the government's promised changes to SEND support make an EHC plan portable between local authorities.