Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

Moorings left through a canceled field season caught Canada's last epishelf lake draining

Instruments nobody could reach in 2020 recorded the Milne Fiord lake losing its freshwater layer within months of the ice shelf breakup, and the annual visits since have found nothing of it coming back.

The Scientist · Science desk

Photograph accompanying Moorings left through a canceled field season caught Canada's last epishelf lake draining
Photo: rmg.co.uk

What happened

  • The Milne Ice Shelf on northern Ellesmere Island broke apart in July 2020, losing 45% of its area and removing the barrier that had held a layer of fresh water above seawater in Milne Fiord.
  • Drawing on a decade of ocean measurements, satellite imagery and field observations, the Scientific Reports study finds the freshwater layer began escaping immediately and had mostly vanished by autumn 2020.
  • Instruments anchored in the fiord through the 2020 field season, which COVID canceled, recorded the rapid salinization, but the data could not be retrieved for two years.
  • The first field measurements taken after the breakup, in July 2022, found brackish water had fully replaced the distinct freshwater layer, and annual monitoring since has found no sign of recovery.
  • The shelf sits inside the Last Ice Area and within the Tuvaijuittuq Marine Protected Area, whose name means the place where the ice never melts in Inuktitut.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Bringing the lake back would mean regrowing the shelf that dammed it, which the authors say the current climate trajectory rules out, so the loss represents a permanent subtraction of an ecosystem type rather than a low point in a cycle.
  • exposure The region set aside as the northern hemisphere's most durable ice refuge has already lost one of its ecosystems, so refuge status reflects expected sea ice persistence, a separate measure from the stability of the shelves inside it.
  • capability The only continuous record of the event came from sensors left in a place no one could reach that year, which is an argument for instrumenting sites where the transition worth measuring may happen while nobody is present.

Fresh water floats, which is why the dam in this system never needed to be a wall. The shelf only had to block the buoyant layer's route out to sea while the denser water beneath it stayed connected to the ocean [2]. When the shelf broke, that block went with it, and the study reports that fresh water entering Milne Fiord now flushes directly into the ocean because what remains of the shelf cannot contain it [15].

The observation gap is worth doing the arithmetic on. The breakup and the first hand-collected profile after it fell in the same month of different years, two years apart [19], so what is known about the drainage itself comes from unattended sensors [14]. Jeremie Bonneau of Universite Laval, who did part of the work during his PhD at UBC, says decades of thinning preceded the event and the lake then drained within months [7]; the logged timeline puts the transition inside a window of roughly two to four months [20].

One lake and one breakup give no replicate, so the causal reading rests on before-and-after at a single site: a decade of ocean measurements, satellite imagery and field observations spanning both sides of the event [5], with the annual returns since acting as the persistence test [8]. Those returns have included Silas Pijamini and Joseph Shoapik of Ausuittuq (Grise Fiord), co-authors who have been on the fieldwork since 2022 [12]. For the drainage, that is about as clean as single-site High Arctic work gets. The permanence is a different sort of statement. Re-establishing the lake would require the ice shelf to recover, which the authors say is not possible under the current climate trajectory [15], and Bonneau's framing is that a system built over thousands of years will not return on any human timescale [18]. The drainage is measured; the irreversibility follows from what the shelf can do, and it carries whatever uncertainty that projection carries.

The reported findings describe the ecosystem's structure but stop short of a census. The lake held freshwater microorganisms near the surface and marine species below [3], and the loss as Andrew Hamilton of the University of Alberta describes it is structural, a freshwater ecosystem sitting directly on a marine one with only a thin boundary between them [10]. Bernard Laval of UBC makes the related point that an epishelf lake is a readout on the shelf holding it, and this one was reporting that the shelf was failing [9]. Derek Mueller of Carleton University, who established the monitoring program, says it was designed to follow the fiord's transition from a system with an ice shelf and an epishelf lake to one that is seasonally ice-free [11]. The program is now measuring the second condition.

What to watch

  • Whether any annual profile at Milne Fiord detects a transient freshwater layer, which would bound how completely the stratification is gone.
  • Whether the remaining Milne Ice Shelf loses further area, since the study ties any return of the lake to the shelf recovering.
  • Whether the fiord becomes seasonally ice-free on the timeline Mueller's monitoring program was built to capture.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories