Product1 publisher3 min readPublished
Europe's next battery bet is a silicon anode foil that reaches production at the end of 2026
Northvolt and Morrow are bankrupt, and the two Dutch battery companies in the BBC's account sell components instead of whole cells, with the customers for both of them in Asia. The nanometre work took ten years.
The Product Desk · Product desk

What happened
- Sweden's Northvolt and Norway's Morrow have both filed for bankruptcy, and the BBC reports fears in Europe that the continent has missed another technology shift.
- Powall, in Delft, is developing commercial-scale equipment that uses atomic layer deposition to put nanometre coatings on the micrometre powders that go into today's cells.
- Neither company is trying to build an entire battery, and both already have commercial relationships with customers in Asia.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint A Dutch anode or coating inside a cell assembled in Asia leaves the sourcing decision where it was; the buyer's approved supplier list does not change because the IP is European.
- decision Anyone specifying cells for a 2027 product now has to decide whether to hold a qualification slot for a foil whose production line only starts at the end of 2026.
- cost Verification lands on the buyer, because the up-to-50% number comes from the company selling the anode and no cell maker's measurement is on the record.
- capability Coating gives materials that pass on capacity and fail on durability a route to a shipping product, so a chemistry parked in the lab can re-enter a cell maker's roadmap.
Silicon is cheap and works well in an anode, and pure silicon cracks: it expands and contracts every time a cell runs and recharges [5]. LeydenJar's method is plasma deposition, building an ultra-thin pure silicon foil one tiny layer at a time, which the company says resists the cracking and lifts battery life, charging speed and energy density by up to 50% [6]. Rood said that where a pure silicon anode would normally fall apart, this one stays stable, and he called it a wonderful invention [7]. His shorter version: "We address the bottleneck in the battery" [8].
The factory is in Eindhoven, where ASML and other chip industry players sit [9]. Rood said the crossover is what separates the company from a lab result: "once you've demonstrated the principle in the lab, industrialization requires you to work with the semiconductor technology and suppliers" [10]. He said the patenting and IP work that comes with that is "much more difficult to do in the US or in China" [11].
Commercial-scale production starts at the end of 2026, and reaching that point has taken ten years [3][4]. Subtract, and the work began around 2016 [12]. A buyer qualifying cells for a 2027 product would be designing around a line that has been running for months.
Powall, in Delft, leaves the cell architecture alone and coats the powders that are the raw material of today's batteries, using commercial-scale equipment it is still developing [13]. The granules are micrometres across and the coatings are nanometres thick, applied by atomic layer deposition, with powder and coating carried by gas into a chemical reaction [14][19]. "Your battery works less well than before after using it thousands of times - that degrading or aging can be slowed down when you're using a nanocoating," Colen said [15]. New materials, he said, "typically have one element which is very good, but they suffer on the durability side" [16].
An increasing number of investors and researchers are looking at that nanometre scale, according to the BBC [21]. Neither of these two firms is trying to build a whole battery, and both have commercial relationships with customers in Asia [17]. So the European part arrives inside somebody else's cell, and a European buyer's purchase order goes where it went last year. Rood said companies like his can fortify Europe's position in what has become a global contest [18]. On this evidence, that position is patents, equipment and process knowledge.
The up-to-50% gain is LeydenJar's own figure, and the account carries no independent measurement, no named customer and no volume [23]. Rood is not selling certainty either. He said that if this can be made to work it touches many industries, and that it is a risky business [22].
Two questions separate a component pitch from a sourcing decision. Which cell part number will carry the improvement, and when can I sample that part. Who measured the gain, the component maker or the cell maker. LeydenJar answers the first with the end of 2026 and the second with itself [3][23]. That makes a silicon foil anode a 2027 requalification item and keeps it out of this year's order.
What to watch
- Whether LeydenJar's end-2026 line ships to a named cell maker, and at what volume.
- An energy-density measurement published by a cell maker instead of by LeydenJar.
- Whether Powall's commercial-scale coating equipment finds a European customer, given both firms' current relationships are in Asia.