Science1 publisher3 min readPublished
A Polish propolis extract strengthened amphotericin B against four yeast pathogens in vitro
A Wroclaw Medical University team reports in Scientific Reports that an ethanolic propolis extract acted synergistically with amphotericin B against four yeasts, including Candida auris, and antagonistically with three other antifungal drugs.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- A Wroclaw Medical University team tested an ethanolic extract of Polish propolis against four yeast pathogens that cause candidiasis: Candida albicans, Nakaseomyces glabratus, Pichia kudriavzevii and Candida auris.
- Chemical analysis of the extract identified 77 compounds, with the flavonoids pinocembrin, chrysin, galangin and pinobanksin among the most important.
- The researchers say theirs is the first study to show an ethanolic propolis extract eliminating Candida auris under in vitro conditions.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Propolis composition tracks the plants around the hive, so the interactions measured belong to this one ethanolic extract and do not transfer to a jar bought somewhere else.
- exposure The direction of the interaction changed with the drug, so combining a propolis preparation with an antifungal is not a neutral act in the dish; whether it does anything in a patient has not been tested.
- capability If the amphotericin B synergy holds up beyond plates, it points toward lower dosing, which the authors link to fewer adverse effects and slower resistance.
- contradiction The two method counts published for C. auris cannot both sit inside a four-method design, which leaves the result for the hardest pathogen the least pinned down of the set.
Whether two substances look synergistic depends partly on which assay you use to ask. The Wroclaw group ran four interaction methods and called amphotericin B synergistic where at least three of them agreed, for every species in the panel [4]. For Candida auris the result was less clean: two methods returned an additive effect, meaning roughly the sum of the two components acting alone [5]. Synergy, by the definition the authors use, is an effect greater than the individual effects predict [6].
Those two statements are hard to fit together. Synergy in at least three of four methods, plus additivity in two, makes five results out of four methods for the same organism [16]. A reader who wants to know how firm the C. auris call is has to go to the paper.
The account of the study does not report inhibitory concentrations or how many isolates of each species were tested [17]. That limits what the synergy finding can tell you. It gives direction, not magnitude: the combination did better than the parts predicted, not whether amphotericin B's effective concentration fell by one dilution step or several.
The other direction is the part that would matter at a bedside. Propolis did not improve every drug it was mixed with; some combinations were additive, some showed no significant interaction, and some were antagonistic, meaning the mixture may work less well than expected [7]. Three of the drugs named on the antagonism side are caspofungin, clotrimazole and ketoconazole [15].
On the upside, Piotr Kuś of the Department of Pharmacognosy and Herbal Medicines at Wroclaw Medical University, a co-author, said that "adding propolis extract may increase the effectiveness of amphotericin B, making it possible to achieve stronger inhibition or elimination of the fungus with lower exposure to the individual substances" [9]. Amphotericin B is used, among other indications, against severe fungal infections [14].
What was tested is one extract, not a product category. The researchers identified 77 compounds in it, with the flavonoids pinocembrin, chrysin, galangin and pinobanksin among the most important [3]. Propolis composition depends on the plants growing around the hive, which makes it a complex mixture rather than a single defined substance [12]. "Propolis is a highly heterogeneous substance with a variable composition and activity, containing hundreds of chemical compounds," Kuś said, and in the team's earlier work "individual compounds showed moderate activity, unlike specific combinations of these compounds" [8].
The four pathogens were Candida albicans, Nakaseomyces glabratus, Pichia kudriavzevii and C. auris [2]. C. auris is the one that drove the design: it causes health care-associated infections and can resist antifungal drugs [11], and according to the researchers this is the first study to show that an ethanolic propolis extract can eliminate it under in vitro conditions [10]. The authors write that combination therapies allowing lower doses, fewer adverse effects and slower resistance are a direction for further research, not a treatment ready for clinical use [13].
What to watch
- Inhibitory concentrations and interaction indices in the Scientific Reports paper, which would show whether the amphotericin B shift is one dilution step or several.
- Whether the antagonism with caspofungin, clotrimazole and ketoconazole repeats with propolis extracts of different botanical origin.
- Any animal or pharmacokinetic work showing that a propolis preparation taken orally reaches the concentrations used in these plates.