Leadership1 publisher3 min readPublished
Automattic's board put Mullenweg on leave at a company that depends on servers he controls
Directors named the finance chief interim CEO on September 9 and left the open-source project's distribution servers under Mullenweg's personal control, while the WP Engine suit still names him alongside the company.
The Board Room · Leadership desk

What happened
- Automattic's board voted on September 9, 2026 to place co-founder Matt Mullenweg on paid leave and named finance chief Mark Davies interim chief executive, with Mullenweg staying on the board.
- In a Slack message visible across the company, Mullenweg said the resolution reached him 50 minutes before directors met and that his requests for time with independent counsel were denied.
- He listed Toni Schneider, Davies, Ann Dunwoody and Sue Decker as voting for the leave and said he voted against, and Schneider confirmed the decision on the internal message board.
Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Directors can reassign the chief executive's authority but cannot vote on the update servers, so Automattic's own hosting customers still depend on a distribution path held outside the company.
- exposure WP Engine sued Automattic and Mullenweg together, so stepping back from the executive role does not step him out of the case, and interim management inherits a discovery fight it did not open.
- decision The 8% licence theory and the trademark-misuse counterclaims are company positions, which makes pressing or narrowing them a management choice now rather than a founder's.
- precedent Any board sitting over a business built on a project one person controls personally now has a worked example of how little of that control a board vote reaches.
The corporate perimeter is doing the work here. A board's authority runs to the officers and assets of the company it governs, and WordPress.org sits outside that perimeter under Mullenweg's personal control, which is why directors could hand the chief executive's duties to Mark Davies without touching the site and servers through which users obtain plugins, themes and updates [1][7]. Automattic sells hosting through WordPress.com, and rival hosts including WP Engine sell hosting for the same free software [8]. The vote changed who signs for the commercial company and left the distribution dependency where it was.
The number that started the fight repays a minute of arithmetic. In September 2024 Mullenweg demanded a trademark licence priced at 8% of WP Engine's monthly gross revenue, an amount he estimated at roughly $32 million [9]. Taken as a twelve-month figure, that estimate implies a revenue base near $400 million, since 32 divided by 0.08 is 400 [18]. A price set as a share of a rival's entire top line is a claim on the business rather than a fee for a mark, which is close to what WP Engine's attorney told Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin that November: "That's not how you calculate a royalty. That's how you set a ransom" [13]. Automattic's attorney answered that the proposed licence allowed WP Engine to supply volunteer hours of equivalent value instead, and the judge said she was inclined to grant an injunction but found WP Engine's proposed terms too vague [14][15].
A skeptic would say that paid leave with a board seat retained is a holding action rather than a removal, and the record leaves room for that reading, because Mullenweg remains a director and no source states why the board acted now [2][6]. The litigation calendar is what gives the move weight. WP Engine sued Automattic and Mullenweg in October 2024 alleging defamation and abuse of power, Automattic filed counterclaims in October 2025 alleging trademark misuse, and on July 28, 2026 WP Engine moved for sanctions in a dispute over missing messages [10][11][17]. Those are corporate positions, and from September 9 they belong to Davies to press, narrow or settle [1].
The community heard the split described on the day of the vote. Mary Hubbard, the WordPress project's executive director, wrote that Mullenweg remained its leader and that its work would continue as planned; she joined the project after heading governance and experience at TikTok's US operation [16]. Toni Schneider, who ran Automattic from 2006 to 2014 before Mullenweg took over, confirmed the board's decision on the internal message board and was named by Mullenweg among the four directors who voted for the leave [5][4].
This quarter's question is procedural: who answers the sanctions motion, and whether the 8% theory survives contact with new management. The longer consequence is structural. Roughly 23 months into the litigation, Automattic's board demonstrated it can replace the person running the hosting business, and demonstrated in the same resolution that the update path its customers rely on stays with a private individual whose only formal tie to the company is now a board seat [19][7][2].
What to watch
- Whether the court rules on WP Engine's July 28, 2026 sanctions motion over missing messages, and against whom.
- Whether Davies keeps Automattic's October 2025 trademark-misuse counterclaims and the 8% licence theory, or moves toward terms.
- Whether the board states a reason for the leave, or Mullenweg's account of 50 minutes' notice and denied counsel is corroborated in a filing.