Science1 publisher3 min readPublished
A Carnegie Mellon lab is coring a 178-acre Pittsburgh steel site for pollutant-eating bacteria
Hazelwood Green's soil carried BTEX for decades before its cleanup. A microbiologist two miles away is sequencing cores from differently contaminated parts of the site to test whether the resident bacteria kept the genes to break those compounds down.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- A Carnegie Mellon microbiologist is drilling soil cores at Hazelwood Green, a former steel site on Pittsburgh's Monongahela riverfront, taking soil from areas with different historical levels of contamination.
- The site's contaminants include the petroleum-derived group BTEX, made up of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene, which can be toxic to humans and other organisms and includes known carcinogens.
- DNA extracted from the cores is read by metagenomic sequencing, with one stated goal being to find bacterial genes associated with degrading BTEX and other hydrocarbons.
- The published account describes the sampling and the analysis as under way, and stops short of saying whether past contamination left a detectable signature in the communities.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Every comparison in the study is drawn inside one 178-acre footprint, so even a strong positive cannot be pulled apart from that site's own soil and its remediation history until a second brownfield with a different industrial past is sampled the same way.
- capability If hydrocarbon-degradation genes track the old contamination map, the bacteria already living under a brownfield become something a characterisation report can quantify instead of an unknown that gets excavated along with the soil.
- decision The cores drilled for contaminant chemistry are the same cores that would answer the biological question, so paying for DNA work is a choice made at the drilling stage or not at all.
- precedent Former industrial land across Appalachia and the Rust Belt is already being converted into housing and research space, and a demonstrated selection signature at one Pittsburgh site would make resident-microbe sampling a reasonable thing to ask for at the others.
The selection argument is old and simple. A gram of soil can hold billions of bacterial cells drawn from thousands of species [7]. A compound like benzene is toxic to most of them, while a few already carry metabolic pathways that let them tolerate it or consume it as food, which gives those few an advantage over neighbours at the same site [8]. The survivors grow more common, and in bacteria that advantage can move sideways, because the genes pass directly to other bacteria and not only to offspring [9]. More than a century of steelmaking on that stretch of the Monongahela, including the Jones & Laughlin Steel Co., ran a long unplanned version of that experiment [3].
To read that experiment, the sampling never leaves the site. Soil comes from areas of Hazelwood Green with different historical levels of contamination [10], in cores that preserve the layers at each depth [11]. Decades of contamination records have been mapped onto the modern site, so microbial abundance can be compared across locations and depths [14]. Comparing a polluted site against a clean one elsewhere would change the soil, the setting and the management history at the same time. Staying inside one footprint holds those roughly constant.
It also inherits a confound. The contaminated soil at Hazelwood Green was remediated, and the site is now a centre for research, technology and community engagement [6]. The communities in those cores have lived through the pollution and through the cleanup, and a contrast drawn inside one site cannot say which of the two shaped them.
Then there is the distance between a gene and a cleanup. Metagenomic sequencing identifies the microorganisms in an environmental sample directly from its DNA rather than growing and studying one organism at a time [12], so what comes back is a catalogue of what is present. The author writes that DNA sequencing helps establish what microbes might be capable of, and that the lab isolates bacteria to test those predictions directly [15]. The second step is where a rate would come from: how fast an isolate degrades BTEX at the concentrations actually in the ground.
All of this rests on one site. 178 acres [1] works out to about 0.28 square miles [18], one industry on one river, studied by a lab two miles away [2]. Across Appalachia and the Rust Belt, former industrial sites are being turned into neighbourhoods, research centres and technology hubs [20], and a characterisation protocol that asks about resident biology would need more than a single Pittsburgh footprint behind it.
The prediction is worth testing. Hazelwood Green's soil held petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals and other pollutants [4], among them BTEX, some of it carcinogenic [5], which is the kind of sustained pressure that should leave a mark on a microbial community. I would expect a clearer signal in the genes than in the degradation rates, since a gene can persist in a community after the compound that favoured it is gone. For now the account covers the collecting and the comparing [16].
What to watch
- Whether the lab publishes abundance of BTEX-degradation genes against the mapped contamination history, broken out by depth.
- Whether isolates from the site degrade BTEX at the concentrations measured in the ground, and at what rate.
- Whether the same comparison is run at a second brownfield with a different industrial history, which is what would separate selection from local soil.