Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

Adobe guided November revenue $16m under the consensus it had just beaten by $70m

Adobe's August quarter cleared analyst estimates by about 1 per cent on revenue and 0.8 per cent on adjusted earnings, and the stock fell more than 2 per cent after hours once the guidance was in front of investors.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Adobe guided November revenue $16m under the consensus it had just beaten by $70m
Photo: yahoo.com

What happened

  • Adobe reported August-quarter revenue of $6.76bn on Thursday, up 13 per cent from a year before and only slightly above the $6.69bn analysts tracked by FactSet had been expecting.
  • Adjusted earnings came in at $6.13 a share, a few cents above the $6.08 analysts were modelling for the quarter.
  • Adobe shares were down more than 2 per cent in after-hours trading on Thursday.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Without a dollar base for the AI-first line, a shareholder cannot test 150 per cent growth against the roughly $780m of revenue Adobe added year over year, so the AI claim stays unauditable from outside.
  • decision Chakravarthy takes over on Dec. 1 owning a November guide he did not set, with no permanent CFO beside him; his first chance to reset the numbers is on someone else's forecast.
  • exposure Because the bottom of Adobe's own range is $41m under the consensus that existed before it guided, a November print inside the range can still be written up as a miss.
  • precedent A 1 per cent revenue beat paired with a forward midpoint 0.23 per cent light drew a 2 per cent markdown, which sets the reference point for the next print at the top of the guide.

The beat is $70m of revenue on a $6.69bn consensus, or 1.05 per cent, and five cents of adjusted earnings on $6.08, or 0.82 per cent [1][2][1][2]. Both gaps are smaller, in percentage terms, than the after-hours move in the shares [4][9].

Adobe's November revenue range of $6.8bn to $6.85bn has a midpoint of $6.825bn, which is $16m below the $6.841bn analysts tracked by FactSet were already modelling, or 0.23 per cent below it [3][3]. The low end of the range sits $41m under consensus, and only the top of the range clears it, by $9m [4]. Adjusted EPS guidance does clear at the midpoint, by a cent and a half [5]. That midpoint also implies about 1 per cent sequential revenue growth from the quarter just reported [7].

Rebecca Wettemann, principal analyst at Valoir, characterised the performance as essentially meeting investors' expectations, and told MarketWatch in emailed comments that "in this environment, you can't just meet" [12][9]. Companies, she said, "have to beat and drive the narrative" [10]. On the timing: "A mediocre quarter right before the CEO handoff is the worst possible timing," Wettemann wrote. "Chakravarthy walks into the job Dec. 1 carrying investor doubt instead of a running start, with the CFO seat still unfilled" [11]. Shantanu Narayen steps down at the start of December, with Anil Chakravarthy, who runs the Customer Experience Orchestration business, named as successor, and the permanent CFO search is still open [7][8].

The AI disclosures are a growth rate and a user count. Adobe said what it calls AI-first annual recurring revenue was up 150 per cent from a year before, and that it has more than 1 billion monthly active users across its general creativity and productivity offerings [5][6]. Neither figure comes with a dollar attached in the report [8]. Total growth of 13 per cent implies a year-ago August quarter of about $5.98bn and roughly $780m of revenue added since [6]. How much of that $780m the AI-first line supplied is not derivable from what was published, and MarketWatch reports that Adobe faces rivals offering free or cheap creative tools [13].

My read is that the markdown is priced off the $16m and not off the tone of the AI commentary, so describing this as a quarter where meeting expectations was treated as a miss is loose. What it is is a small forward miss. The counter-read is available in the same numbers: a 0.23 per cent midpoint gap is the sort of conservatism a finance function sets when the CFO seat is empty, and guiding EPS above consensus is what a company does when it expects to beat its own revenue midpoint. Both are testable in December. If November revenue prints above $6.85bn, the 2 per cent was an argument about rounding; if it lands in the lower half of the range, the guide was the signal and the 150 per cent ARR growth did not carry the quarter.

What to watch

  • Whether Adobe puts a dollar figure on AI-first ARR in the November report, which would let the 150 per cent be checked against total growth.
  • Whether a permanent CFO is named before the Dec. 1 handoff to Chakravarthy.
  • Whether November revenue prints above the $6.85bn top of the guided range or in its lower half.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories