Skip to content

Leadership1 publisher2 min readPublished

S&P 500 pay plans opposed by both ISS and Glass Lewis failed only 19% of the time in 2026

Pay Governance found just 19% of S&P 500 pay plans opposed by both ISS and Glass Lewis failed in 2026, down from 50% in 2022. The weight now sits with the five largest asset managers, whose own voting frameworks backed pay 95.6% of the time.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

Illustration accompanying S&P 500 pay plans opposed by both ISS and Glass Lewis failed only 19% of the time in 2026

What happened

  • Average say-on-pay support at S&P 500 companies reached 90.3% in 2026, up from 87.1% in 2022 and the only reading above 90% in five years, Pay Governance found.
  • When ISS and Glass Lewis both recommended against a pay plan, 19% of those plans failed to win majority support in 2026, compared with 50% in 2022.
  • Opposition from a single advisor also lost force: 13% of ISS-opposed and 9% of Glass Lewis-opposed plans failed, down from 37% and 25% in 2022.
  • The five largest asset managers backed say-on-pay 95.6% of the time and broke from advisor opposition in an overwhelming majority of cases.
  • Only 5% of S&P 500 companies received less than 70% support this season, compared with 11% in 2022.

Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision Compensation committees preparing for 2027 votes gain more from studying the proprietary pay frameworks of the five largest managers than from engaging ISS or Glass Lewis alone.
  • constraint The number of against recommendations a company collects is now a weak guide to whether its plan fails, so advisor reports give less early warning than they did in 2022.
  • precedent With more than 80% of plans passing despite opposition from both advisors, passing over advisor objections is now the expected outcome, and a committee can hold a contested design with less risk of a failed vote.

Between 2022 and 2026, the failure rate for pay plans opposed by both advisors fell 31 percentage points. That is a relative drop of 62% [1]. Emily Chase, Perla Cuevas and Linda Pappas of Pay Governance put the decline down to large institutional investors that apply proprietary voting policies and run their own compensation analyses [13][12]. "These results suggest that proxy advisor recommendations have become less determinative of SOP outcomes," they wrote [14].

The board-deck version says the advisors matter less and the big five matter more. Pay Governance counts those five as BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity Management & Research, State Street Investment Management and J.P. Morgan Asset Management [9]. That version is incomplete, because the advisors have not stepped back. Glass Lewis opposed 13% of S&P 500 pay proposals this season, slightly more than a year earlier, while ISS opposition fell to 9% [6].

A skeptic would say the market explains much of this. Failures have held at 1% of S&P 500 pay proposals since 2024 [5]. In those same years, one-, three- and five-year total shareholder returns were strongly positive, and the authors present the two trends as coinciding [5]. The data cannot tell investors who judge pay independently apart from investors who are content with their returns. We do not know yet how the big five's frameworks treat a large award in a year the share price falls. The 2026 figures are also year-to-date, drawn from the roughly 90% of S&P 500 companies that had held annual meetings by July 31 [2].

For compensation committees, the working threshold is 70%. When support falls below that level, investors expect more from the next proxy statement, which must disclose shareholder engagement and responsiveness [11]. The failure rates above only record whether a plan passed or failed. They do not show how far support fell at companies that passed over an advisor's objection. Awards a committee approves this year will be judged in the 2027 season by investors applying their own frameworks [12]. The authors' advice is that "understanding investor expectations and effectively communicating rationale for compensation decisions is critical to strengthening SOP support" [16].

What to watch

  • The first say-on-pay season after a year of negative S&P 500 returns, and whether failure rates under dual advisor opposition climb back toward 2022's 50%.
  • Full-season 2026 figures once the remaining roughly 10% of S&P 500 companies have held their annual meetings.
  • Revisions to the big five managers' proprietary pay voting frameworks ahead of the 2027 proxy season.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories