Published Leadership3 min read
Your Build Pipeline Is the Most Over-Privileged User You Have
A Forbes Technology Council roundup on CI/CD permissions points at the same weak spot from eight directions: the identity that fetches open-source code is usually the identity that can publish to production.
Context for builders, not their beat.See today for builders

What happened
- Forbes.com published a Forbes Technology Council roundup titled "CI/CD Security Risks Leaders Should Review Before Attackers Do" on August 13, 2026, in which council members highlight CI/CD permission and workflow decisions technology leaders should regularly reassess. Forbes Technology Council is described as an invitation-only community for CIOs, CTOs and technology executives.
- Because pipelines can interact with source code, credentials, cloud infrastructure and production environments, they may hold far more authority than any single development task requires; if an attacker compromises a dependency, build process or other supply chain link, overly broad pipeline privileges can turn that foothold into a much wider breach.
- Eshaan Jain of Mphasis Silverline says the nightmare scenario is not a malicious pull request but a hijacked build agent quietly injecting poisoned code into a signed, trusted container.
- Jain recommends locking down the pipeline's write path to the artifact registry and segmenting permissions so the tool that fetches open-source libraries is never the same identity that pushes to production; he says the proxy's scope should be reviewed, because if it can publish, an attacker who slips into a build log already owns the next deployment.
- Ganesh Ariyur of Transform Smarter says a build pipeline is basically a user and usually the most powerful one an organisation has, able to reach production and holding every secret, an amount of authority no human would be handed; he advises reviewing the build system as if it were a privileged person.
Compiled by The Board RoomSomething wrong?How this is made
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Forbes.com published a Forbes Technology Council roundup titled "CI/CD Security Risks Leaders Should Review Before Attackers Do" on August 13, 2026, in which council members highlight CI/CD permission and workflow decisions technology leaders should regularly reassess. Forbes Technology Council is described as an invitation-only community for CIOs, CTOs and technology executives.
- [2]
Because pipelines can interact with source code, credentials, cloud infrastructure and production environments, they may hold far more authority than any single development task requires; if an attacker compromises a dependency, build process or other supply chain link, overly broad pipeline privileges can turn that foothold into a much wider breach.
- [3]
Eshaan Jain of Mphasis Silverline says the nightmare scenario is not a malicious pull request but a hijacked build agent quietly injecting poisoned code into a signed, trusted container.
- [4]
Jain recommends locking down the pipeline's write path to the artifact registry and segmenting permissions so the tool that fetches open-source libraries is never the same identity that pushes to production; he says the proxy's scope should be reviewed, because if it can publish, an attacker who slips into a build log already owns the next deployment.
- [5]
Ganesh Ariyur of Transform Smarter says a build pipeline is basically a user and usually the most powerful one an organisation has, able to reach production and holding every secret, an amount of authority no human would be handed; he advises reviewing the build system as if it were a privileged person.
- [6]
Ariyur says a single bad dependency does not need to break in; it just asks the pipeline to do the damage for it.
Sources & coverage · 1 publisher
The reporting this story was synthesized from, earliest first. Every link goes to the original.
- forbes.comExpert Panel®, Forbes Councils MemberAug 13CI/CD Security Risks Leaders Should Review Before Attackers Do
Cited in this coverage: Forbes Technology Council, forbes.com
Additional citations
- Forbes Technology Council article introduction
- Eshaan Jain, Mphasis Silverline
- Ganesh Ariyur, Transform Smarter
- Manas Chaudhari, Meta
- Ankit Kumar Honey, GitHub Inc. (Microsoft)
- Mahendran Chinnaiah
- Gaurav Singal, ConstructConnect
- Jagadish Gokavarapu, Wissen Infotech
- Forbes Technology Council roundup (contributor attribution truncated in source text)


