Product1 publisher3 min readPublished
ElevenLabs' CEO will squeeze margins for share in a voice market he expects to even out
ElevenLabs CEO Mati Staniszewski will let gross margins shrink to win share, at a $600 million annual revenue pace and a reported $22 billion valuation. Decagon trained on its voices and now competes with it, so teams buying voice AI should plan to swap the voice itself.
The Product Desk · Product desk

What happened
- Klarna runs first-line phone support for 35 million US customers on ElevenLabs' voice models, according to TechCrunch.
- Decagon, a conversational AI platform, trained its voice product on ElevenLabs and now competes with it, running queries through its own models.
- ElevenLabs says it is pacing at $600 million in annual recurring revenue, and its backers reportedly value the four-year-old company at $22 billion.
- CEO Mati Staniszewski would not detail gross margins but said he does not mind them being squeezed further if it expands market share.
Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- decision Teams buying voice for informational calls can put price and contract length ahead of voice quality, since ElevenLabs' own CEO expects model gaps to narrow within three to five years.
- cost ElevenLabs is paying for market share out of gross margin, and a buyer at renewal can treat that stated priority as room to push on price.
- constraint Refunds and authenticated calls still need frontier reasoning models by Staniszewski's account, so the expensive line in transactional support stays with the model a buyer picks.
- precedent Decagon's route, building on ElevenLabs and then moving queries to its own models, is now a path other platforms reselling ElevenLabs voices can follow.
A patient booked into Poland's public health system gets a phone call reminding them of the appointment. The caller is an ElevenLabs agent. Staniszewski told TechCrunch it is integrated with models the Polish side had already tuned on its own knowledge, and the data stays in the country [16]. The calls go out because 18% of booked patients never show up [16].
The pitch is grander. Staniszewski wants ElevenLabs to be the first to pass the Turing test for conversational AI, and he said that takes emotional intelligence: "You need to understand the emotions of the other side, to be able to slow down or speak up" [11]. That pitch assumes callers reward the most human-sounding voice. What callers actually do, by TechCrunch's account, is often fail to notice they are talking to an AI at all [1].
Once the voice clears that bar, Staniszewski himself puts call quality somewhere else. For informational calls, "you can use a lot of the open-source models because your knowledge base defines what a good experience is," he said [14]. ElevenLabs lets customers pick that reasoning layer from a menu of frontier and open-weight models [13]. The exception he named is financial services, where a caller needs authentication, transaction details or a refund: "There's no room for error. Here, frontier models will still lead" [15].
So a voice agent is at least two purchases, and the voice is the one its own seller expects to converge. At TechCrunch Disrupt last year, Staniszewski predicted audio models would be commoditized within a couple of years [8]. His timeline is now longer [3]. "There is still a lot of work to be done, and the quality delta you can achieve just on the model level is still significant," he said [9]. "If we think longer term, probably three, five years from now, those differences will be smaller" [10]. Asked about Decagon, he said: "The lines become more blurry" [17].
Investors are paying for the lead as it stands. The reported valuation is about 37 times the company's stated revenue pace [2]. At least 55% of revenue is classic enterprise [12], or roughly $330 million a year [1]. Klarna shares the customer list with Deutsche Telekom, Cisco, Adobe and a growing list of governments [3]. The interview does not include resolution rates or a price per call for any of these deployments.
For a buyer, two axes sort each call type. One is whether the call moves money or only answers questions. The other is whether your team or the vendor owns the knowledge base and the call flow.
Informational calls running on your own knowledge base make the voice the most replaceable part. I'd buy those on price with short terms, and treat the margin ElevenLabs says it is willing to give up as leverage [7]. The tradeoff is switching work at each renewal, through the three to five years in which Staniszewski says model differences still count [10].
Transactional calls on your own flow need the frontier reasoning model he says still leads there [15]. Lock-in on the voice is the smaller risk in that box.
When the vendor owns the flow, in either column, the buyer is renting the part that decides whether a call goes well [14]. Decagon shows a platform can build on ElevenLabs and then move its queries to its own models [4].
What to watch
- Klarna or ElevenLabs publishing resolution or escalation rates for the phone line serving 35 million US customers.
- An ElevenLabs gross margin figure, in a funding round or filing, showing how far the squeeze for market share has gone.
- Other ElevenLabs platform customers following Decagon by moving voice queries onto their own models.