Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

Trump reaches for the Space Force template to answer the data-center backlash

Trump said on Truth Social that he would stand up an AI Force modeled on the Space Force and name an AI czar soon, while still calling the backlash against data centers a hoax created by the left. Industry figures told Politico they had no advance word.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Trump reaches for the Space Force template to answer the data-center backlash
Photo: independent.co.uk

What happened

  • Trump wrote on Truth Social on the 19th that he would create an AI Force modeled on the Space Force, which he called an enormous success during his first term.
  • He called the backlash against AI and the spread of data centers a hoax created by the left, listing it alongside impeachment, climate change and transgender athletes in women's sports.
  • Politico reported that the post contained no specifics about the unit, leaving officials uncertain how it would operate or be staffed while they worked up a response.
  • A day earlier, California Governor Gavin Newsom instructed a group of experts to draft legislation that would allow consideration of a kill switch letting AI developers shut down specific programs.
  • In a recent Associated Press poll, 63% of Americans said they were concerned about the effect of data centers on electricity bills.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint A federal promise not to obstruct the industry does not lift a state mandate, so the kill-switch text being drafted in California is the live legal risk a model developer has to price this year.
  • exposure The softest point in the pro-build coalition is now Republican incumbents whose own voters have turned against data centers, and they are the ones who have to vote on any federal support package.
  • contradiction The administration rejected Amodei's case for slowing down as a hoax and is now promising an organization to respond to the unease that case fed, which leaves no stable federal line for a developer to cite.

An AI czar has to be a person, and the job has been empty since David Sacks left earlier this year [12]. Adam Kovacevich, chief executive of Chamber of Progress, a center-left coalition of technology companies, said the White House has been making AI policy on the fly since Sacks departed, and that it genuinely misses having an organizing leader like him [12]. Trump said he would announce a czar before long, and that he hoped only people with high IQs would apply [2].

The template he chose is seven years old [19]. The Space Force was created in 2019, during his first term, and he called it an enormous success [1][3].

The rest of the post was a scale argument. Trump predicted AI would become the next industrial revolution, comparable to the internet but far larger and more influential, and said it could account for as much as 25% of US gross domestic product [4]. He said the United States is ahead of China and the rest of the world [5]. He said the trouble began with attacks on data centers, and that once people realized data centers become wealthy and prestigious facilities in their communities, the attacks moved to AI itself [7]. His administration, he said, would not obstruct or suppress the industry in any way, and would cherish it, support it and watch it grow [8].

Several industry figures told Politico that the industry had little real knowledge of the decision before the post appeared [10].

For anyone underwriting a site, the part of this record with a constituency behind it is electoral. AI has become a central issue in the midterm campaign, and Republican politicians are moving away from their support for AI and data centers as voters in their districts turn against them [17][15].

So the subsidy-and-speed reading of Washington holds on rhetoric and is untested on instruments. I'd expect the terms that price a 2027 project to be set in a state legislature and by candidates running in districts that host the hardware. The counter-thesis is that the czar arrives with real authority over federal permitting and power, and the state drafting exercise gets preempted. Kovacevich named the bind: the president clearly feels pressure to say something, he said, but he is caught in a dilemma, because until a few days ago he had been calling all of this a hoax [11].

What to watch

  • Who is named AI czar, and whether the role comes with authority over federal permitting or power procurement.
  • Whether the AI Force ever appears in a budget request, an executive order or a staffing table.
  • Whether Newsom's experts produce a bill with a shutdown mandate in it, and which other states copy the text.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories