Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished
Median pay for technology titles reached $2.6mn, up 45.4% since 2021, though one year supplied a 28.9% move on its own, and the largest single award in the data had lost 41% of its value before any of it vested.
The Investor · Invest desk

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Back out the base and the ratio does more work than the dollars. A median of $2.6mn after a 45.4% rise puts the 2021 technology median near $1.79mn [1][1], and a CEO median that gained $698,399 on a 17.2% move puts the 2021 CEO median near $4.06mn and the current one near $4.76mn [2][3][2], which reproduces the $2.27mn CEO-over-CTO gap Fortune reports for that year [13], so the file is at least internally consistent. The gap in dollars barely budged, from $2.27mn to about $2.16mn [13], while as a multiple of CTO pay it fell from roughly 2.3 times to roughly 1.8 times [3], and the multiple is the version a compensation committee negotiates against.
The 28.9% single-year jump that Fortune places in the cycle running from ChatGPT's launch to Microsoft selling Copilot to enterprise buyers [14][15] is most of the four years on its own: compound 1.289 up to 1.454 and the other three years supply about 13% between them [4]. One year of hiring did the work.
Proxy figures are grant-date values, not take-home pay [11], and grant-date values absorb signing awards at full face, which is how one hire moves a median. Hims & Hers reported $60.9mn for Mohamed Elshenawy in 2025 [10] against a $57.2mn new-hire award [6]; strip the award out and about $3.7mn is left for salary, bonus and everything else [5]. (The two May awards were priced on different days: his 1,036,339 units work out to about $55 each, Nader Kabbani's 216,333 to about $62, some 13% higher [7].)
By the last trading day of 2025 that unvested grant was worth $33.6mn, on the company's own figure [11], a markdown of $23.6mn or 41% on an award nobody had touched [6]. The $57.2mn was a price a board set in May, and the value is whatever the shares do before vesting, which is the distinction the median cannot carry.
Dan Laddin of Compensation Advisory Partners reads the trend as boards paying for output, telling Fortune that strategic CTOs are a real value-add [5], and the operating comparison supports him directionally, since the median CTO went from $176,000 behind the median COO in 2021 to $275,000 ahead [12] while CIO medians rose 9.2% [2], about a fifth of the technology move [9]. What the dataset does not contain is any measure of what the money bought. No revenue line, no margin line, only the cost of the people hired to run the programme, which makes this a measurement of price rather than of return.
The test arrives with the 2026 proxies. If technology medians hold near $2.6mn on annual grants rather than on signing awards, the role has been repriced; if they slide back toward that $1.79mn base once the hiring wave clears [1], then the $84,003 by which the CTO median gain exceeded the COO, CFO and CIO gains combined [3][4][8] was an auction premium for a few hundred people, and it will read that way in hindsight.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Median reported compensation for executives with "technology" in the title reached $2.6 million in the most recent fiscal year, up 45.4% from 2021, according to data compiled for Fortune by executive pay analytics firm C-suite Comp.
Over the same period median compensation increased 18.3% for COOs, 17.2% for CEOs, 15% for CFOs and 9.2% for chief information officers.
Median pay for chief technology officers rose $809,587 from 2021 to 2025 while median pay for CEOs rose $698,399, from a starting point twice as high as CTOs.
Operating, finance and information chiefs gained $725,584 among all three roles combined at the median from 2021 to 2025.
Dan Laddin, founding partner at Compensation Advisory Partners, who advises boards on pay programmes, said: "Strategic CTOs are a real value-add for these companies. So people who can do that, and lead that side of the business, you are seeing a dramatic increase."
In May 2025 the Hims & Hers board approved two new-hire awards: 216,333 restricted stock units valued at $13.5 million to incoming COO Nader Kabbani, and 1,036,339 RSUs valued at $57.2 million to incoming CTO Mohamed Elshenawy, more than four times as much.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
One dataset, one outlet, checkable filings
The medians that carry the story come from a private dataset compiled for Fortune by C-suite Comp, and nothing in the piece lets a reader reproduce them: the company universe, the sample size, the pay elements counted and even the year that supplied the 28.9% jump go undescribed. The company-level material is much firmer, because unit counts, grant values and a year-end mark are the kind of thing a proxy statement puts in a table. One definitional detail matters for how far the medians travel: the dataset picks executives with "technology" in the title, which puts a president of product and technology in the same bucket as a traditional CTO.
Four named boards, unmeasured spread
Boards are visibly paying up, but the visible part is four companies: Hims & Hers, Symbotic, Workday and Walmart, each with a named executive and a dollar figure. Above that sits a median crossover with COO pay, which is the only population-level evidence that the behaviour is widespread, and it comes without a distribution, a company count or any sense of whether a handful of large grants pulls it. The AI product timeline offered as the cause is well established but arrives secondhand and connects no company's AI spend to its own pay decision.
Careful on value, stretched on framing
Fortune undercuts its own biggest number rather than protecting it, noting that proxy figures are grant-date values, that none of Elshenawy's units had vested and that the $57.2 million was worth $33.6 million by the last trading day of the year. Two framings still run ahead of the arithmetic. Setting one role's $809,587 median gain against the summed gains of three other roles is not a like-for-like comparison, and a $275,000 median edge over COOs is called a new world order in the C-suite while the same data has the median CEO still $2.16 million ahead of the median technology chief.
Numbers supplied by pay advisers
Both outside voices sell into the market they are describing. C-suite Comp is an executive pay analytics firm and its dataset is the story; Compensation Advisory Partners advises boards on the very programmes whose escalation Laddin calls dramatic. Hims & Hers has its own interest in the language Fortune quotes, since "unique competitive circumstances for AI talent" is the sentence that justifies giving a new CTO more than four times the incoming COO's award, and no comparable justification was written for the COO who was gone within six months.
Direction firm, magnitude unverifiable
That technology pay has moved faster than the rest of the C-suite is consistent across every named example and both the percentage and dollar cuts of the data. How much faster depends on numbers only one firm can see, published by one outlet, with the pivotal single year unidentified and the role defined by a title keyword. Anyone quoting 45.4% or the 2.3-to-1.8 compression should carry the caveat with it.
invest
Only 34% of the C-suite knows who owns AI decisions. 57% of their subordinates do.1 publisher
product
Rillet's $100M reads as proof mid-market ERP is rip-and-replace, mostly at the cheap end1 publisher
product
ChatGPT Work's real ask is your Slack, and somebody has to say yes on everyone's behalf1 publisher
invest
Cigna's $200M AI savings projection runs to about 2.4 basis points of a year's revenue1 publisher
Publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · September 7, 2026