Skip to content

Product1 publisher3 min readPublished

Anti-woke posters are building a GTA VI backlash out of marketing clips

Grand Theft Auto VI arrives on November 19. The objections circulating now are assembled from leaks and preview footage, so launch teams are deciding what to answer before anyone has played the thing.

The Product Desk · Product desk

Photograph accompanying Anti-woke posters are building a GTA VI backlash out of marketing clips
Photo: wired.com

What happened

  • Rockstar's Grand Theft Auto VI is out on November 19, ending a 13-year wait since GTA V.
  • Lucia Caminos is the series' first mandatory female protagonist, and her relationship with the other lead, Jason Duval, evolves according to the player's choices.
  • What the public knows about the game so far comes from multiple leaks and a 27-minute "extended look" preview released on Netflix.
  • Complaints about the series' politics predate this game: in 2022 Rockstar cut gags and non-playable characters that critics called transphobic from its GTA V remaster, and some fans objected.
  • Last month former video game executive Mark Kern said Lucia was attractive, and Wired reports that his own followers disagreed in openly racist terms.

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint The shared evidence is preview clips, so any pre-release answer from the company argues about clips too. Moderation of a company's own channels is the one lever that works whatever the finished build contains.
  • decision Silence or a statement is now a call taken months before reviews, and Rockstar has so far taken the first option. Whoever writes that policy is writing it against footage their own marketing released.
  • exposure Artwork and named individuals are reachable long before the product is. Harassment response therefore sits in the marketing calendar.
  • precedent Each remaining marketing beat before release becomes a scheduled occasion for another round, so community staffing tracks the asset schedule.

Lucia asks Jason to pick an outfit for her, and she is mildly annoyed when he seems more or less indifferent to the options she presents [5]. Wired described the scene as an exchange that "could have been lifted from any sitcom of the past 50 years" [6]. On Tuesday an X account with the handle @Wokenessisevil shared the clip and wrote, "GTA 6 is a humiliation ritual for all male gamers" [4].

The rest runs on the same footage. "The script is definitely written by a woman who has no clue what a man thinks or how he talks," another X user wrote [7]. A gaming YouTuber, objecting to a shot of Jason shirtless, wrote: "Gone are the days of edgy based masculine GTA games" [8]. One YouTuber has decided the game will subliminally brainwash players with "bisexual lighting" [16]. Wired reports that the people driving this know very little about the game itself [22].

The loud accounts are arguing with a marketing clip. A nervous launch team hears a constituency forming against its product. Wired's own assessment is that would-be detractors "are still straining a bit for reasons to pronounce it dead on arrival" [18], and it likens the effort to the failed furor over supposedly woke elements of Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey [21]. The report includes no preorder, wishlist or refund figures and no measure of effect on demand [20]. Count the posts and you learn nothing about demand, up or down. Launch-week refund rates and day-30 retention would settle it, and neither exists yet for a game that ships on November 19 [1].

Wired dates four flare-ups around this title, and two of them landed within about the past month [19]. The most recent round is built on Rockstar's own footage [4].

Wired traces the wider pattern to the height of Gamergate in 2014, when a subset of male gamers began keeping watch for the influence of women and LGBTQ developers in games [15]. The report documents individual accounts and one named former games executive. It does not describe a coordinated campaign.

Rockstar did not immediately return Wired's request for comment [11]. Its creatives have said they intended to portray the diversity of the Miami-inspired setting realistically and to bring a fleshed-out female character into the spotlight [10]. Staying quiet leaves the clip to be explained by whoever posts about it. It also denies the next round a fresh company statement to quote.

For anyone sorting this on Monday, two questions settle most cases. Is the complaint about something actually in the build? Would answering it change what a buyer does? Both yes, and you correct the record with specifics. In the build but irrelevant to the purchase decision, and you leave it. Not in the build but aimed at a person or an asset, like the cover art an AI enthusiast doctored to replace a woman of color in a crop top with a white blonde in a bikini [17], and it is a moderation matter run through the rule you already wrote. Neither, and there is nothing to answer.

A moderation rule written two months out is policy. Write the same rule in launch week, with the clip already in circulation, and it looks like picking a side.

What to watch

  • Whether Rockstar comments on the record about the clip, or holds its no-comment posture through November 19.
  • Launch-week refund rates and player review scores, the first data that would show whether any of this reached buyers.
  • Whether X and YouTube apply their own rules to the doctored cover artwork and the racist replies documented by Wired.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories