Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

US freeze on Tether-linked payments firm Capstone locks up 80% of EQIBank's money

US prosecutors froze $84.2 million held by Capstone, a payments group that people familiar with the case say paid out for Tether and Bitfinex. EQIBank, the Dominica bank between them, says the freeze locked up most of its money, and a judge has turned down its first bid to get it back.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying US freeze on Tether-linked payments firm Capstone locks up 80% of EQIBank's money

What happened

  • A civil forfeiture complaint filed July 15 in the Eastern District of California accuses payments group Capstone of moving money without a license.
  • People familiar with the matter told the Financial Times that Tether and its sister exchange Bitfinex are the two crypto firms the complaint leaves unnamed.
  • Capstone was incorporated in Montana, the only US state that does not license money transmitters, and told banks it was an IT services company, prosecutors allege.
  • District Judge Dale A. Drozd on July 16 turned down EQIBank, the Dominica bank linking Tether to Capstone, in its attempt to recover the frozen money.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • cost So far the loss falls on EQIBank, now under enhanced supervision in Dominica, while Tether and Bitfinex say they keep only limited assets at the bank.
  • exposure Payouts made for two crypto firms ran through US bank accounts that a single forfeiture complaint could freeze, with about 96% of the seized money at Wells Fargo entities.
  • constraint With its own recovery bid rejected, EQIBank's clearest route back to the money is Capstone's planned motion to dismiss.

A Tether spokesperson put the company's exposure to EQIBank at "less than 0.034% of the assets of the group" [12]. EQIBank said in a court motion filed June 29 that it learned on April 2 that about 80% of its monetary assets, held through Capstone, had been frozen [13]. Both numbers describe the same freeze. Dominica's financial regulator has since put EQIBank under enhanced supervision and warned of further action, including potential liquidation [14]. According to the motion, the bank's officials spent about three hours on an April 16 call with Justice Department lawyers, with no US counsel present [18].

Tether and Bitfinex both said they are EQIBank clients, had no knowledge of the conduct alleged against Capstone and keep limited assets at the bank [17]. On the complaint's numbers, Capstone's Wells Fargo business account moved about $34 million a month from March to December 2025 [1]. The share that appears to have gone out on the two crypto firms' behalf, mostly to recipients outside the US, comes to a little under $225 million [2].

The $84.2 million prosecutors froze [1] is about a quarter of what that one account paid out [4]. It sits in five pieces: $79.11 million in a Wells Fargo Securities account, $2.06 million at JPMorgan Chase, $1.86 million at Wells Fargo Bank and about 1.18 million USDT split between two wallets [7]. The three bank balances add to $83.03 million, and the tokens counted at a dollar each make up the rest [6]. About $81 million of the total, or 96%, is at Wells Fargo entities [3].

The complaint also ties Capstone to a scam in which fraudsters posing as FBI agents pressed elderly victims for payments that were converted to USDT within a day or so [9]. That strand involves one account holding just over $2 million [9], about 2.4% of the frozen total [5]. Cryptopolitan, which reported the Financial Times identification, said there is nothing to suggest Tether, Bitfinex or EQIBank knew about it [10].

Capstone denies wrongdoing and plans to file a motion to dismiss, its lawyer said [11]. If that works, EQIBank gets back money it has been unable to use since at least April 2 [13]. If the forfeiture stands, the bank is back in front of a court that has already refused it once [15], with a regulator that has warned of possible liquidation [14]. Neither crypto firm is accused of wrongdoing, and the complaint as filed names neither [3].

I think the risk this case exposes sits with the small firms that Tether's payouts pass through on the way into US banks, and their balance sheets set how large it is. A bank holding four-fifths of its monetary assets through one Montana company [13] was placed under enhanced supervision and warned of liquidation after a single freeze [14], while Tether states its exposure in hundredths of a percent [12]. That view is wrong if the dollars Tether and Bitfinex had in transit through Capstone prove far larger than their balances at EQIBank; the reporting does not include a dollar figure for either. US pressure on USDT also comes from the other end. Two Thai businessmen are suing Tether over 42.4 million USDT it froze, allegedly at the verbal request of a Homeland Security agent, Cryptopolitan reported [16].

What to watch

  • Capstone's planned motion to dismiss and how the Eastern District of California rules on it.
  • Any further action by Dominica's financial regulator against EQIBank, including the liquidation it has warned of.
  • Whether Tether or Bitfinex disclose how much money they had moving through Capstone when the accounts were frozen.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories