Invest1 distinct publisher3 min readPublished
Michael Nicolls moves over from Starlink to run the AI data centers, where mobile turbines and portable chillers bought speed at the cost of redundancy, and where Anthropic's $1.25bn-a-month lease can be cancelled.
The Investor · Invest desk

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Two prices sit inside the same build. The company's own boast puts the first two computing clusters of its second data center at roughly a quarter of what the industry typically pays, without saying which expenses that estimate covers [3]; The Information's account of how the speed was achieved puts mobile gas turbines, Tesla Megapack batteries and more than 100 portable chillers on the Macrohard site [4], and describes Tennessee and Mississippi facilities running for months with no backup cooling or power at all [6]. Redundancy is a large share of what a conventional data center dollar buys, so the plainest reading of the discount is that it was financed by the plant that only earns its keep on the bad day, and the internal target quantifies the bad day precisely: 99.9 percent allows 8.76 hours of downtime a year, about 44 minutes a month [3], and the site consistently sat under it [5].
Now the money the uptime is protecting. Google's reported deal runs about $920m a month for roughly 110,000 Nvidia GPUs [13] and Anthropic's Colossus lease as much as $1.25bn a month, cancellable [14], which is $2.17bn a month or $6.51bn a quarter [1] against the $2.6bn of AI revenue actually reported for the second quarter of 2026 [12]. That is 2.5 times the last reported quarter [2], so either the contracts bill later than they were signed or the capacity behind those headline numbers is not yet delivered. Annualised, the two named contracts are $26.04bn, leaving under $2bn of the roughly $28bn book for Reflection AI [4]; Anthropic alone is about 54 percent of it [5], and Anthropic is the one holding the exit.
What this reshuffle is not doing is also visible in the staffing. A Falcon and Dragon senior production manager and a Starbase product-support director have moved onto the data center team [10], a Neuralink engineer has been brought in, and the open roles are civil engineering [11] - commissioning and construction skills, drawn from programmes that presumably wanted to keep them. Sites beyond the Memphis hub, including proposed Texas locations, have been pushed back [7], while June's disclosed 1.4 gigawatts leaves 0.6 gigawatts to add, 43 percent above the current base, to reach more than two gigawatts by the end of 2026 [8][7].
This is probably wrong, but the cheap build may still pencil: training runs that checkpoint lose hours to an outage rather than a contract, and $2.6bn in a quarter against $737m a year earlier, up 3.5 times [6], is revenue a fully redundant schedule would not have booked at all. I would drop the read entirely if the outages turn out to be commissioning teething, because temporary chillers and turbines can be swapped for permanent plant without repricing the build - the Bastrop foundry for turbine blades and vanes, which Musk says could pull deployment forward by up to 18 months [18], is an argument that the fix is procurement rather than architecture, though the NAACP's complaint about unpermitted turbines at Memphis [19] is an argument that permanent plant has its own queue. One caution on the record: this account describes Nicolls as running SpaceX's AI data centers in one sentence and overseeing xAI's infrastructure in another [1][2], and the equity has already marked something, at $143.36 on September 1, some 36 percent under June's $225.64 peak and 37 percent above August's $104.83 low [17][8].
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
SpaceX handed control of its AI infrastructure to Michael Nicolls, a senior Starlink executive, following a series of leadership departures, with the company under pressure to maintain stable operations for compute customers including Google and Anthropic.
The same report states that Michael Nicolls has been appointed to oversee xAI's infrastructure after several senior data center executives left the company over recent weeks.
Elon Musk confirmed that SpaceX is building a foundry in Bastrop, Texas, to make its own gas-turbine blades and vanes, and said the move could speed natural-gas turbine deployment by as much as 18 months.
The Information reported that SpaceX compromised other factors to build its data centers quickly, and that xAI's Macrohard site used temporary equipment including mobile gas turbines, Tesla Megapack batteries and more than 100 portable chillers.
SpaceX has pushed back plans for data centers beyond its Memphis hub, including proposed sites in Texas.
The delays cast doubt on plans to generate more than two gigawatts of computing capacity by the end of 2026; SpaceX reported in June that it had about 1.4 gigawatts online.
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · September 1, 2026
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
product
Musk puts AI's power bottleneck inside a vacuum casting furnace in Bastrop1 distinct publisher
product
SpaceX paid $60B for Cursor to fix Grok, and Cursor's customers inherited the plan1 distinct publisher
build
Grok 4.6 lands in Copilot two days after launch, and the model picker becomes a procurement problem1 distinct publisher
invest
Musk prices the 2027 grid shortfall at 15 gigawatts of dark compute1 distinct publisher
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Thin, and rarely first-hand
One outlet carries this, and it is seldom the witness. The turbines, Megapacks and portable chillers come from The Information; the outages and the missed uptime bar come from one unnamed project worker; the $28 billion annual Colossus figure comes from Cryptopolitan quoting Cryptopolitan. What is checkable — the September 1 close against June's peak, the gap between 1.4 gigawatts and a two-gigawatt target — holds up fine. It is the operationally decisive material that has no second witness.
Real customers, wobbly delivery
Whatever the sourcing, compute is moving: roughly 1.4 gigawatts online as of June, AI revenue up from $737 million to $2.6 billion year over year, two named buyers in Google and Anthropic. The reason this does not score higher is that demand looks firmer than delivery — the Anthropic lease can be cancelled, sites past Memphis are deferred, and the end-2026 target still needs 43 percent more capacity than June's disclosed base.
The cost boast outruns its accounting
Clusters online for a quarter of the going rate is the headline, and SpaceX will not say which costs are in the number — while the same report itemises what the discount bought: months of operation with no backup cooling or power in Tennessee and Mississippi. The contract figures lean the same way. Rates of $920 million and $1.25 billion a month would bill about 2.5 times the AI revenue actually booked last quarter, and no one in the story reconciles them.
Nobody disinterested speaks
SpaceX supplies the cheap-build claim and Musk supplies the 18-month turbine acceleration. The outage account comes from someone who worked on the project and is not named. The $28 billion book comes from this outlet's own back catalogue. And the piece is pegged to a ticker, a 36 percent drawdown and a rebound off the August low, which is the frame a retail-trading readership pays attention to. None of that makes the reporting wrong; it does mean every number in it was placed by someone with a position.
Confident about the sourcing, not the substance
We can say with some confidence what was published and how it was gathered; much less about whether it is accurate. With one publisher, no word from Google, Anthropic or SpaceX on the contract terms, and the most consequential facts arriving second-hand, a single on-the-record confirmation or denial would move this read substantially in either direction.