Skip to content

Invest1 publisher3 min readPublished

Snowflake's $9.77 billion backlog covers nearly two years of its current run-rate

Product revenue grew 30% to $1.23 billion in the quarter to January 31 while remaining performance obligations grew 42%, and the 12-point gap is the closest thing budget owners have to a forward reading on committed data spend.

The Investor · Invest desk

Illustration accompanying Snowflake's $9.77 billion backlog covers nearly two years of its current run-rate

What happened

  • Snowflake's product revenue in the quarter ended January 31, 2026 was $1.23 billion, 30% higher than a year earlier.
  • Remaining performance obligations, the contracted work Snowflake has not yet recognised as revenue, stood at $9.77 billion, up 42% year over year.
  • The company added 740 net new customers, up 40%, and called it its strongest ever quarter for net new customer acquisition.
  • It counted 733 customers spending more than $1 million on a trailing 12-month basis, a 27% increase, alongside a record number above $10 million.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint A finance team cannot turn 42% backlog growth into a forecast of what enterprises will actually spend on data platforms next year.
  • decision A vendor carrying close to two years of contracted coverage has little reason to discount at renewal, and buyers negotiating fiscal 2027 terms are dealing with a counterparty whose near-term revenue is already signed.
  • exposure With expansion supplying 25 of the 30 points of growth, a pause in consumption among the 733 million-dollar accounts reaches the revenue line long before it shows up in backlog.
  • capability Snowflake can now bid for IT operations budget, a market it sizes above $50 billion, having bought Observe and TensorStax.

Product revenue of $1.23 billion in the quarter annualises to $4.92 billion [1], and the $9.77 billion of remaining performance obligations sitting against it is 1.99 years of contracted coverage [2]. A year earlier the same division gave 1.82 years, $6.88 billion against $3.78 billion [3][4][5]. Coverage extended by roughly two months [6].

That extension is the part of the 42% to handle carefully. RPO rises when customers commit more per year and when they commit for more years, and the release reports the $9.77 billion as a single figure; Snowflake did not disclose how much of it falls due within twelve months [15]. Twelve percentage points separate RPO growth from product revenue growth [10]. Some of that gap is duration.

The dollar comparison is harder to explain away. RPO grew by $2.89 billion year over year while the annualised product revenue run-rate grew by $1.14 billion [7][8]. That is about $2.50 of new commitment for every dollar of new annual revenue [9].

Where the revenue came from is a different question. Net revenue retention of 125% [4] means the existing base supplied 25 of the 30 points of product growth, leaving about five points for new customers [11]. Snowflake also reported its largest quarter of net new customer additions [6]. The count of customers spending more than $1 million on a trailing twelve-month basis rose from about 577 to 733, an addition of 156 [5][12]. Its Forbes Global 2000 customer count went from about 752 to 790, 38 added across the year [8][13].

"This quarter reflects the strength of our strategy focused on two fundamentals for durable growth: landing new customers and expanding them into strategic, long-term relationships," said Brian Robins, Snowflake's chief financial officer [12].

Sridhar Ramaswamy, the chief executive, said "This past year has been transformative for every business, as the promise of AI became real, and Snowflake sits at the center of the enterprise AI revolution" [11]. The release measures that in accounts: more than 9,100 using Snowflake AI features, and almost 2,500 using Snowflake Intelligence within three months [9][10]. Those are adoption counts, and the 30% is reported at the company level across all product revenue [2].

I take the 2.5-to-1 ratio of new backlog to new run-rate as the strongest number in the release, and as evidence that enterprise buyers are still signing multi-year data commitments at scale [9]. The counter-thesis is duration: if average contract length rose, the same 42% is consistent with annual committed spend growing closer to 30% [10], and the sign would be a coverage ratio that climbs past 1.99 years while revenue growth stays at 30% [2]. The third reading is concentration. Expansion at 125% retention accounts for 25 of the 30 points [4], and 790 Global 2000 customers growing at 5% a year will not replace it [8][13].

What to watch

  • The fiscal 2027 first-quarter report, and whether net new customer additions hold anywhere near the 740 just posted.
  • A current versus non-current split of the $9.77 billion in the annual filing would settle how much of the 42% is contract duration.
  • Movement in net revenue retention off 125%, the first place a consumption slowdown in the largest accounts would show up.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories