Build2 publishers3 min readPublished
More people expect AI to cut jobs than create them in 34 of 37 countries
Pew asked more than 42,000 people what AI will do to employment, and the median answer was fewer jobs. TechSpot's reading of the tables puts the most AI-aware respondents among the most worried, and a Mercer survey puts executives at 99%.
The Engineer · Build desk
What happened
- A new Pew Research Center poll found that in 34 of the 37 countries surveyed, more people believe AI will lead to fewer jobs than believe it will lead to more.
- South Korea and Australia were the most pessimistic at 76% expecting fewer jobs, with the United States third at 71% over the next 20 years.
- The United States is the only country where Pew had asked the question before, and the share there expecting job losses from AI has risen seven percentage points in two years.
- Nigeria was the only country surveyed where more respondents expected AI to create jobs than to cut them, and the margin was a single point.
- Bloomberg's analysis, published Thursday, counted layoff notices for more than 14,500 Bay Area tech employees filed between June 2025 and June 2026.
Compiled by The EngineerSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint TechSpot's reading of the tables puts the most AI-aware respondents among the most concerned about jobs, so the staff who pilot a new internal tool first are the group least likely to take a reassurance memo at face value.
- decision With Mercer's executives at 99% expecting AI-driven cuts within two years, any rollout note promising no headcount effect contradicts what the executive population itself told a survey, and someone has to choose which version to publish.
- precedent Meta's abandoned second round of cuts shows staff resistance combining with weak results to stop a plan. That kind of pushback belongs on the delivery risk list as well as the communications one.
- contradiction The two accounts of the same Pew report count 36 and 37 countries, so a per-country denominator quoted in an internal deck depends on which write-up the author read.
Pew's four answer shares add up to 93 [22]. TechSpot describes them as a 37-country median: 46% expecting fewer jobs, 13% expecting little difference, 9% expecting more jobs, 25% unsure [3]. Each share is the middle country's answer for that one option, and the middle country is not the same country across options, so the four are not slices of one sample. Quoting the 46 against the 9 as a five-to-one margin [23] treats two separately computed medians as one population. The US figure sits 25 points above the median on the fewer-jobs option [24].
For anyone planning an internal rollout, the within-country breakdowns carry more than the headline does. In many of the middle-income countries surveyed, wealthier and more educated respondents were the ones more likely to expect AI to reduce job numbers over the next two decades, and TechSpot attributes much of that gap to greater uncertainty among people with lower incomes and less education [12]. TechSpot also reports that people with high awareness of AI are more concerned about its impact on jobs [13]. In a number of countries the most concerned age group is 18 to 34, and concern in the US has grown most in that group [10].
The concerned-against-excited split is narrower than the jobs question. Across the 37 countries, a 37% median were more concerned than excited, a 41% median were equally concerned and excited, and Israel is the only country where more respondents were primarily excited [14].
Executives are on the same side of the jobs question as the public. A Mercer survey cited by TechSpot found that 99% of the executives questioned expected AI to lead to job cuts within two years [15]. That 99% is what executives told Mercer. Meta cut 10% of its workforce and then abandoned plans for a second wave amid disappointing AI results and employee resistance [16]. Some employers have rehired workers they replaced with AI after the automation failed to deliver [17].
The measured job losses in the same newsletter are smaller than the expectation. The Bay Area tech workforce is about 375,000 people and is down roughly 7% since 2024, according to the analysis The Deep View cites [19]. The one-year notice count Bloomberg published works out to about 3.9% of that standing workforce [25].
These surveys do not test how an internal announcement moves an employee's expectation. They map the starting position an announcement lands on, and it was already there in March, when Quinnipiac University found 70% of Americans believed AI will reduce job opportunities and 55% believed it would do more harm than good [20]. Jason Hiner wrote in The Deep View that Pew data "shows people overwhelmingly expect AI to reduce jobs, leaving Silicon Valley with a credibility gap it still hasn't closed" [21].
What to watch
- Whether Pew repeats the jobs question outside the US, which so far is the only country it has trended.
- Whether Meta revives the second round of cuts it abandoned, and on what stated grounds.
- Whether the Bay Area's 375,000 tech headcount keeps falling in the next count.